fontforge-double
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55633
Originaly fix to a LilyPond bug. This is not needed anymore since they
fix the problem in extra/fontconfig and probably they rebuild lilypond.
I forgot to request it before.
Thanks
--
Bernardo Barros
em.
When I see a package from speps I know it's a good one. I'm sure he will
improve the situation for Pro Audio and [community] ``official'' repo users.
--
Bernardo Barros
k it again recently. During the transition I
was using `darcs-beta` from cabal.
--
Bernardo Barros
ble with
the new ghc yet. `darcs-beta` have (or had, not sure) problems with UFT8
characters in filenames.
--
Bernardo Barros
9 months is not that much time.. mplayer2-git works fine here.
I think the idea is exactly that, just keep the "binary" [haskell] packages.
And let other people maintain the other packages.
Good one!
In the end it's still haskell, since perl 6 is better implemented in
haskell http://pugscode.org/
Please remove audacity-cvs, project moved to svn.
Already made a svn one [2].
Thanks
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4532
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53099
core/net-tools 1.60.20110819cvs-1 breaks my internet connection
I had to downgrade it to connect with wicd.
i.e. they don't work with an arch system updated in the last years...
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Bernardo Barros
wrote:
> They work with KDE 3.5 and 4.1 *only*, will not work with 4.6/4.7:
>
> => "LilyKDE is a full package for LilyPond document editing in KDE 3.5.&
They work with KDE 3.5 and 4.1 *only*, will not work with 4.6/4.7:
=> "LilyKDE is a full package for LilyPond document editing in KDE 3.5."
=> "lilypond-kde4 (for KDE 4.1 only)"
* same as 'frescobaldi' :
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36986
* old versions (discontinued and replaced by frescobaldi)
of frescobaldi (old/different naming but very same project):
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21738
AND
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=
Hi
We have now a separated packages for SuperCollider Plugins
sc3-plugins-git
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51106
So those packages should be removed,
since they are equivalent to supercollider-git + sc3-plugins-git
(And they are duplicate BTW)
supercollider-with-extras-git
http://a
old packages (sc uses git now):
---
+ sc3-plugins-svn
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36602
+ sced-svn
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29285
+ scvim-svn
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35130
merged with sc3-plugins:
--
python3-* do not make sense on a rolling release distro.
In Fedora, for example, they do. Then in Fedora 16 or whatever, they
just switch names. No problem.
For a rolling release distro I think we might think with an eye ahead
to avoid future problems.
For example, take to python packages, A and
>> On Tuesday 07 June 2011 16:10:47 Ángel Velásquez wrote:
>> > LXDE doesn't have much updates upstream, so isn't unmaintained at all
>> > (by me I mean), there are many upstream bugs for more than a year
>> > that aren't fixed yet.
>> >
if I may: about openbox: this doesn't mean they are not wor
2011/6/8 Allan McRae :
> Seriously? If someone can not find the time to update a package in 3
> months, there will be other people who can do a better job. If we waited 6
> months for updates, we might as well be using Ubunutu.
>
Well, it's different. I think that could happen two whole differen
Also, why not setup an automatic reminder (email) every month?
2011/5/17 Cédric Girard :
> There is no such things as "DropBox" in the official repo. Please post to
> aur-general instead.
>
Sorry.
(Tell me if there is a better / better-supported alternative.)
2011/5/17 Nicolas :
> On 17/05/2011 16:25, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> Looks like you have not downloded the good architecure (i686 or x86_64)
> package for your computer.
>
> What is the output of: file /usr/bin/dropboxd
>
It's the same...
~/ /usr/bin/dropboxd
/usr/bin/
I'm glad it's there since extra still has the old version, it's more
then a week now. As soon as extra is updated, those aur packages
should be deleted, but not now.
Hi all
One of my packages became obsolete and I forgot to warn about it.
Please remove supercollider-with-sn-plugins-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44763
Reason: supernova server was merged a long time ago into supercollider
and this package is now equivalent to supercolider-with-
There are similar cases like emacs-bzr and emacs-git.
emacs is developed in bzr, the git repo is just a not-up-to-date mirror
Well, with "tags" you could put more then one tag in a package. That's
my feature request for next AUR release! :-)
2011/3/3 Ray Rashif :
> Not really. It is still under "Multimedia", generally. Only in
> technical circles does it get more cognitive and/or disciplined
> relationships, like "Electronics" and "Engineering". As far as we're
> talking about software, it's all just multimedia :)
>
I'm talking about
Yes, maybe more like "tags" not categories. We from pro audio miss a
more specific category too, like "pro audio", since multimedia is much
to much to much broad!!
2011/2/27 Ng Oon-Ee :
> Talk to a TU, no reason to spam the ML for this
>
hum..
Please remove supercute (qt gui extension for supercollider) related packages:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44570
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45735
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44598
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44476
Reason: it was merged into mai
Sorry for the noise, I got it from ArchWiki :-)
Thanks guys.
cat << EOF >> "$pkgdir/usr/bin/Eisenkraut"
#!/bin/sh
"$JAVA_HOME/bin/java" -jar '/usr/share/java/Eisenkraut/Eisenkraut.jar'
EOF
Hum,
Maybe just create a symlink in /usr/share/java/Eisenkraut/jar poiting
to /usr/share/eisenkraut/Eisenkraut.jar ?
Sorry if that too obvious, but I don't do java.
Hi Phillip,
I could just put the jar file (Eisenkraut.jar) to /usr/share/java, but
the application also need a few data folders too, not I though would
be incorrect to put everythin under /usr/share/java/eisenkraut. What I
came up was to put the entire application in /usr/share/eisenkraut and
make
Hi all,
I don't know much about Java.. but I wanted to package this one
because of SuperCollider and it seems a good sound editor anyway.
Please people with experience with Java and Java packages revise this
one:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46459
thanks!
Bernardo
Angel,
If AUR is a sucessgul project, it is not because of this kind of
language you use. Be friendly to your fellow Arch friends. I'm sure
that if the other TU would share this language, another project
similar to AUR would pop up elsewhere.
2011/2/7 Yaro Kasear :
> Sure you can change licenses if you own (Hold copyright to.) all the relevant
> code involved.
That's way OT, but I'm curious now... :-).
Then if I did a BSD code that a company used in their proprietary
code, and then I change it to GPL, what happens then? The company wi
2011/2/7 Bernardo Barros :
> 2011/2/6 Ray Rashif :
>> # Copyright 1999-2011 Gentoo Foundation
>> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
>
> But Arch is a legal entity? Can we put "Arch" as the copyright holder?
Whoever name is there, GPL seems just right, I think.
2011/2/6 Ray Rashif :
> # Copyright 1999-2011 Gentoo Foundation
> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
But Arch is a legal entity? Can we put "Arch" as the copyright holder?
2011/2/6 Xyne :
> I agree that the simpler, the better, Most PKGBUILDs are not worth
> copyrighting
> anyway. The key point is to make sure that all PKGBuILDs can be used freely by
> Arch.
BSD is also copyright, isn't it?
Copyright . All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and b
Yes, but since you can't change a licence (from BSD to GPL), then
Apple can just download the entire Arch repository code to adapt and
use in their AppStore code, for example. Very unlikely, but possible
since you can use PKGBUILD on OSX.
2011/2/6 Gaetan Bisson :
> "By uploading content to the Arch User Repository, you irrevocably agree
> to release it in the public domain, to the extent permitted by law."
GPL would do no harm to Arch either. And pieces of code with less then
10 lines can't have any copyright. The difference in pra
Very good idea, I will check it out.
AUR was under some kind of version control before or it never was?
2011/2/6 Xyne :
> What is the legal status of files submitted to the AUR? I have always assumed
> that anything uploaded to the AUR is automatically licensed under the GPL or
> something similar, in the same way that content contributed to the wiki is.
Ownership and authorship aren't the same. In
I mean, if they provide the same thing, there should be just one. Right?
2011/2/3 Bernardo Barros :
> Lyx beta3 has two packages in AUR:
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37964
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45798
>
> no idea which did it better. :-)
>
Lyx beta3 has two packages in AUR:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37964
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45798
no idea which did it better. :-)
Also this one:
acoustica-font-ttf 1-1
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44855
Please delete the following packages.
Reason: I changed their pkgnames to more appropriate.
I wasn't aware of fonts convention at the time.
For the supercollider plugin I omitted "ugen", since all 'plugins'
in supercollider parlance are 'UGens'.
supercollider-dfm1ugen
http://aur.archlinux.o
2011/1/25 Xyne :
> If you want a better system, add deletion and orphan request buttons to the
> AUR
> interface that send an email to this list automatically or, even better,
> create
> a TU dashboard for the AUR where TUs can view submitted requests, along with
> reasons, how long packages have
Ray,
I applied this rule, see if you agree and/or have comments about this commit:
https://bitbucket.org/smoge/archaudio/changesets
commit 207
bdcca46a0a12
I find it looks clearer and more organized.
Best!
Bernardo
Hi all!
I'm packaging some audio plug-ins and I wanted to know if there is any
naming convention to this, as with fonts.
Since there are different formats (LADSPA, LV2, DSSI and VST), if we
follow the convention used with fonts (like ttf-x), we will get:
lv2-x
dssi-x
ladspa-xx
Hello everyone!
I set up a repository based on a modified version of ArchAudio, with
some of my stuff and lots of PKGBUILDs from AUR's contributors. Hope
this helps to update and maintain ArchAudio alive and updated. Just
source for now, no binaries.
It is a hg repo, so it can also be hosted inBi
aur/hunspell-pt-br also seems updated with the new orthography rules
for Brazil and Portugual.
If the users' comment is correct, should I change my font package
names from xxx-font-ttf to ttf-xxx?
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44857
It seems to be the same thing for me:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37964
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44306
the only difference is --enable-build-type=pre, that I thinks does not
change much.
Cheers!!
Strange, it has even a release date, but the link is empty. The
developer forgot to upload in sourceforge? I will try to contact him.
I flagged qutecsound outdated a while ago, still waiting.
The user has almost 200 pacs... that must be hard for him/her.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23502
there are two packages for faust development.
the team switched to git
faust-cvs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37082
faust-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44767
This package is several versions outdated and the owner does do not respond:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19271
2010/12/21 Cédric Girard :
> Why do you need to put this in post_update as well ?
>
> Could you also try to reduce this to meaningful info ? Like "Please be
> advised that ardour3 is not ready for use yet".
I did like this because Paul Davis (the developer that aked to change
it) said me he was c
Dear TUs,
If you decide to leave the package in AUR, I've already added this to
post_install and post_update:
echo ">>>
WARNING"
echo ">>> This is not an official ardour or arch package, as most of
AU
I wrote an comment there. You be useful to have a space to put that
kind of message on top in AUR website, don't you think? I will also
put a post_install message as you suggested.
2010/12/20 Xyne :
> Bernardo Barros wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I suggest to remove ardour3
Hi,
I suggest to remove ardour3-svn from AUR. It's not ready for use
yet. See message from the author below.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34433
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paul Davis
Date: 2010/12/20
Subject: Re: [LAU] Ardour3
To: Bernardo Barros
Cc:
2010/12/19 Evangelos Foutras :
> Done, thanks.
>
> Please including a link in the future.
ops sorry, and thanks again.
Please remove qsampler-cvs from AUR, since I'm updated it to qsampler-svn.
Thanks!
62 matches
Mail list logo
