Please delete 2 messages please, this one and:
https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2012-November/020987.html
Since was a clear mistake, sorry
Thanks
I also use a SD card with the keyfile to unlock / luks volume and works
fine, no need to udev rules.
My setup also failed at first, I needed to follow the module chain
dependency and found a needed module not present in initramfs, just
added it and started working like a charm.
On 08/14/2012 01:34 AM, Connor Behan wrote:
d) Delete hitech-picc32-bin[8].
[8] are a legacy compiler for a long time, Microchip in [8] page says:
"Microchip highly recommends the MPLAB C Compiler for PIC32 (SW006015)
for new designs."
Note that the recommended (SW006015)=microchip-mplabc32_bin[
you can have an idea.
[8]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54315
Sorry for all the requests, thanks for everything.
Best Regards,
BxS
On 07/06/2012 09:33 PM, Ike Devolder wrote:
Op vrijdag 6 juli 2012 20:44:40 schreef BxS:
On 07/06/2012 07:17 PM, Ike Devolder wrote:
Op vrijdag 6 juli 2012 16:11:03 schreef BxS:
Hi,
This is a cleanup on "C Compiler for PIC24 MCUs and dsPIC DSCs" packages
in aur.
Please delete
On 07/06/2012 07:17 PM, Ike Devolder wrote:
Op vrijdag 6 juli 2012 16:11:03 schreef BxS:
Hi,
This is a cleanup on "C Compiler for PIC24 MCUs and dsPIC DSCs" packages
in aur.
Please delete [1]hitech-dspicc-bin, it's only needed for really old code.
But it is still working
Hi,
This is a cleanup on "C Compiler for PIC24 MCUs and dsPIC DSCs" packages
in aur.
Please delete [1]hitech-dspicc-bin, it's only needed for really old code.
Please merge [2]microchip-mplabc30_bin into [3]microchip-mplabxc16-bin,
c30 was replaced by XC16, I keep it for compability and becau
On 06/06/2012 06:50 PM, Simon Gomizelj wrote:
Isn't this why there's a libusb-testing package on AUR?
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53512
No, that is to install a testing version, is to install something that
isn't stable/released or in testing, like beta, rc etc...
What I was ta
On 06/06/2012 05:19 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Evangelos Foutras
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:57 PM, BxS wrote:
aur give this: "libusb is on the package blacklist, please check if it's
available in the official repos."
Why? libusb is
aur give this: "libusb is on the package blacklist, please check if it's
available in the official repos."
Why? libusb isn't any more in the official repos.
Arch now have libusbx, but I still need libusb to at least test some
software to see if it works well with it, because libusbx may be the
Dear TUs,
please delete package [1], it as been replaced by package [2].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57910
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57960
Thanks.
Best Regards,
BxS
Merry Chritmas
On 12/24/2011 09:37 AM, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
All Arch Linuxer,
Merry Christmas,have a nice holiday!
X as name.
Thanks, and keep the good work.
Best Regards,
BxS
(1) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52704
(2) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55048
13 matches
Mail list logo
