Re: [aur-general] Package proprietary softwares with hard-coded paths within /usr/local?

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:13 AM, KY Chou <forendef2...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's a great solution! > But it doesn't have to be the same length actually. > A shorter path with padded 0x00s should also work fine. > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Chi-Hsuan Yen via aur-g

Re: [aur-general] Package proprietary softwares with hard-coded paths within /usr/local?

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Eli Schwartz <eschwa...@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 08/06/2017 08:21 AM, Chi-Hsuan Yen via aur-general wrote: >> Hello Arch enthusiasts, >> >> I'd like to create a package for Pulse Connect Secure, a popular VPN >> software. Cu

[aur-general] Package proprietary softwares with hard-coded paths within /usr/local?

Hello Arch enthusiasts, I'd like to create a package for Pulse Connect Secure, a popular VPN software. Current PKGBUILD can be found at [1]. That package works fine, but it conflicts with Arch's packaging guideline. [2] "Packages should never be installed to /usr/local" The reason I put files

[aur-general] Co-maintainers not receiving flag-out-of-date notification mails?

Hi AUR enthuasiasts, I'm the co-maintainer of depot-tools-git. [1] Two weeks ago that package is flagged as out-of-date, but I didn't receive any notification mail - not in Spam either. For other packages that I'm the only maintainer, out-of-date notifications are well sent. Is it an aurweb bug

Re: [aur-general] Can some TU remove iep package which has been renamed upstream to pyzo

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Hector Martinez-Seara via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > Hi, > the package I maintain in AUR iep [1] has been renamed upstream to pyzo. > I have created a new pyzo package [2] and it is time to remove the old iep. > Can please some TU do it? > >

Re: [aur-general] Split packages

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 08/23/2016 11:27 AM, Chi Hsuan Yen via aur-general wrote: > > All Python build commands can be put into package(), while GTK > applications > > not. It doesn't make a

Re: [aur-general] Split packages

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 08/23/2016 10:24 AM, Chi Hsuan Yen wrote: > > Python packages are not good examples for this thread. > > Whyever not? It seems an excellent example to me... > > Al

Re: [aur-general] Split packages

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Levente Polyak <anthr...@archlinux.org> wrote: > On August 23, 2016 3:11:55 PM GMT+02:00, Chi Hsuan Yen via aur-general < > aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > >At first I used split packages for python-* packages in my AUR repo. > &g

Re: [aur-general] Split packages

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 08/23/2016 09:11 AM, Chi Hsuan Yen via aur-general wrote: > > At first I used split packages for python-* packages in my AUR repo. > > However

Re: [aur-general] Split packages

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Levente Polyak <anthr...@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 08/22/2016 04:02 PM, Chi Hsuan Yen via aur-general wrote: > > FWIW, I have a Python script [1] that generates multiple PKGBUILDs from a > > template file PKGBUILD.template and a parameter fi

Re: [aur-general] Split packages

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Vanush Misha Paturyan via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 01:14:14PM +0200, Bruno Pagani wrote: > > > > > > Le 22 août 2016 12:53:04 GMT+02:00, Lukas Mosimann a > écrit : > > >Hi all, > > > > > >Christoph

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

Hi all, Glad to see there are a series of new packages in Arch Linux. Just found a minor issue: on https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/atom/, the package signer is unknown: Signed By: Unknown (0xB0544167 ) Seems

Re: [aur-general] [PATCH] core/links:Bump to version 2.13

1:45:18AM +0800, Chi Hsuan Yen via aur-general > wrote: > > Maybe the only way is waiting. I have once submitted patches of PKGBUILDs > > to bugs.archlinux.org, but I don't think a trivial version bump will be > > accepted as a valid bug, as the bug tracker says: "Do NOT re

Re: [aur-general] [PATCH] core/links:Bump to version 2.13

Maybe the only way is waiting. I have once submitted patches of PKGBUILDs to bugs.archlinux.org, but I don't think a trivial version bump will be accepted as a valid bug, as the bug tracker says: "Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!" On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Alive 4ever

Re: [aur-general] Access old AUR3 database

On 7 September 2015 at 18:24, Félix Piédallu wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi there, > Can't we access the old AUR3 database anymore ? > I mean there are a lot of PKGBUILD not "transferred", for example > Hollywood and some of its dependencies.

Re: [aur-general] AUR Package deleted: pypy-setuptools

On 12 August 2015 at 05:21, David Phillips dbphillip...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The thread on this list titled Deletion of orphaned packages on AUR4 may be of use to you: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2015-August/031357.html Thanks A bunch of thanks for this! I'll

[aur-general] Archive of AUR3 packages

Dear Arch lovers, Recently lots of orphaned packages on AUR are deleted by Kyrias [1]. Are AUR3 PKGBUILD tarballs kept somewhere? I'd like to re-upload packages I'm using, but it takes too long time to write all PKGBUILDs from scratch. [1]

Re: [aur-general] Archive of AUR3 packages

On 14 August 2015 at 02:37, Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com wrote: On 13/08/15 02:28 PM, Chi Hsuan Yen wrote: Dear Arch lovers, Recently lots of orphaned packages on AUR are deleted by Kyrias [1]. Are AUR3 PKGBUILD tarballs kept somewhere? I'd like to re-upload packages I'm using

Re: [aur-general] AUR Package deleted: pypy-setuptools

On 8 August 2015 at 21:32, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: Kyrias deleted pypy-setuptools. You will no longer receive notifications about this package. Sorry why is this package deleted? I didn't find any deletion request on aur-requests aur-reque...@archlinux.org. Best Regards, Yen Chi

[aur-general] Fields like 'GitRepoPath' in AUR RPC results

Dear AUR developers and users, Not sure whether it's the best place to discuss this problem. Here are my ideas: Current package info returned by rpc.php contains information about a package. For example: $ curl https://aur4.archlinux.org/rpc.php?type=infoarg=package-query; | json_reformat %

Re: [aur-general] Fields like 'GitRepoPath' in AUR RPC results

On 27 July 2015 at 08:01, Sascha Shaw sascha.s...@mail.de wrote: Am 27. Juli 2015 01:13:13 MESZ, schrieb Johannes Löthberg johan...@kyriasis.com: On 27/07, Chi Hsuan Yen wrote: Seems the RPC node does not support such a field. Does that mean hardcoded paths are the only option? For example

Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] Is there a tool for using a single git repo for several packages?

On 9 June 2015 at 07:05, Eli Schwartz eschwart...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Chi Hsuan Yen yan12...@gmail.com wrote: (Due to my poor English, the subject may not be easy to understand. I'll explain it below.) Hello AUR users, First I'm glad to see that AUR now

[aur-general] [AUR4] Is there a tool for using a single git repo for several packages?

(Due to my poor English, the subject may not be easy to understand. I'll explain it below.) Hello AUR users, First I'm glad to see that AUR now switches to a git-based package system. I'm always interested in what are changed for an AUR package. Before AUR4, such an information is generally not

[aur-general] Merge Request

Please merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flex-sdk/ into: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/apache-flex-sdk/ The original Adobe Flex SDK project is now maintained by Apache Software Foundation, and the latest version is 4.11.0, which is officially supported on Linux.