[aur-general] deletion request ffmpeg-svn

Hi :) I would like ffmpeg-svn to be deleted because it's out-of-date and the ffmpeg svn repository won't receive any more updates by reason of the ffmpeg project switching to git. So it would be kind of misleading to have two development packages in aur and one of them frozen. thanks raubkopierer

[aur-general] packages of user ydossow

Hello. Primary I write this mail because the package lib32-xulrunner is outdated and the old source isn't there anymore. So please disown this package. I have not written a mail to ydossow about this because he seems to have time to make new packages (like qffmpeg-libs) and update some (like 389-c

Re: [aur-general] Duplicate Packages for "hudson"

Crappy android spelling. *libs (leibs) **in case (Carsten) of libs Am 04.11.2010 11:48 schrieb "Christian Scharkus" < mail.sensenm...@googlemail.com>: I didn't have a look at the packages and so I don't know wether they are apps or leibs but in Carsten of leibs the na

Re: [aur-general] Duplicate Packages for "hudson"

I didn't have a look at the packages and so I don't know wether they are apps or leibs but in Carsten of leibs the naming pattern java-* should be prefered imho (debian-like) Greetings Christian Scharkus Am 04.11.2010 09:17 schrieb "Stefan Husmann" : Am 04.11.2010 08:46, sc

Re: [aur-general] dpkg outdated - orphan request

But several users stating there is a new version in stable and an Mail about it should get the maintainer in question start to think about it. Maybe it was just the cache especially if he's checking regular for new versions. As I wrote in the forum I have no problem with giving the package back. 2

Re: [aur-general] dpkg outdated - orphan request

I guess so. That's why I wrote someone. But seriously why should anyone but the maintainer unflag an outdated package? And after all I don't stick on it if he wants it back but he was notified by comment some time ago that the package was out of date :/ 2010/2/10 Lukáš Jirkovský : >> >> Hello, >>

[aur-general] dpkg outdated - orphan request

s and Greetings Christian Scharkus

[aur-general] timer-applet orphan request

Hi. I wrote a mail to the maintainer of the timer-applet PKGBUILD in AUR back in May and didn't get an answer by now. So it would be nice to orphan the package so I can correct the mistake myself. Thank You Christian Scharkus

[aur-general] amarok2 beta packages doubles

Hi I just looked for some package containing the latest beta of the amarok music player but there are two packages containing beta3 (amarok2 and amarok-beta3). May the question is childish but: why two packages with the very same content? It just puzzles beginners. Ofcause for archivement are pack

Re: [aur-general] Mozilla Firefox doesn't update because of xulrunner

May try to run pacman -Sy to update your local package database because as far as I see xulrunner have version 1.9.0.4 in the repos. You can combine the update of the system with a databaseupdate with pacman -Syu 2008/11/23 Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hello all. > > If I try to upgrade Mozilla F

Re: [aur-general] missing "arch" in core, community, extra

May fill a Bugreport about this packages ... and because of your Errormessages: There is an option called --ignore-arch (short: -A) for makepkg to ignore missing, incomplete and/or corrupted arch-arrays 2008/10/31 Yura Siamashka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi > > The official PKGBUILDs in core, extra,

Re: [aur-general] Reffering to a Package Version in PKGBUILD

Thank you ... I will fix it in the PKGBUILD :) 2008/10/31 Evangelos Foutras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Christian Scharkus wrote: >> >> I've got a problem with xine-lib crying for ffmpeg>=20080715. I have >> ffmpeg-svn installed and this fullfilled the requiremen

[aur-general] Reffering to a Package Version in PKGBUILD

I've got a problem with xine-lib crying for ffmpeg>=20080715. I have ffmpeg-svn installed and this fullfilled the requirement. But even if I write something like presents=('ffmpeg' 'ffmpeg>=20081031') into my PKGBUILD the error occure again and again. A dynamic Date as mentioned in the comments of

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Stolen material

Theres nothing wrong about the license in my eyes because it is like Ondřej Kučera said: The User is allowed to download the source and compile it. No problem with the PKGBUILD as guide to install. So in this way only the install-script is important: Are you allowed to alter the code but nt to redi

Re: [aur-general] xautomation package

I will do so. Thanks to you two :) 2008/10/30 Ángel Velásquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Daenyth Blank ha scritto: >> >> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 22:40, Christian Scharkus >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hello everybody. >>>

[aur-general] xautomation package

Hello everybody. The current version of the package xautomation at the AUR is outdated the maintainer xcsd seems to be careless about it. The package was submitted about October 2006 and the reffered source is from April 2004. I would like to replace it with this one: # Contributor: raubkopierer