Re: [aur-general] Why keeping OpenRC related packages on AUR?

On 9/16/19, fredbezies via aur-general wrote: > Hello. > > Note: posting in the right mailing list now. Oops! > > I hope it is the right place to discuss about this issue. I noticed > there is a lot of OpenRC related packages on AUR. I don't want to > start a flamewar, I just want to know what is

Re: [aur-general] About bullying in our community (Was: TU Application)

On 2018-10-30 01:23 PM, Adam Levy via aur-general wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 1:06 PM Daniel Capella > wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 5:02 PM Adam Levy >> wrote: >>> Being curt and direct is against the code of conduct? >>> >>> It seems to me that these three rules in particular are relevan

Re: [aur-general] Can my AUR package be reinstated?

On 30/09/17 12:00 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 04:02:00AM +, Adam Fontenot via > aur-general wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:19:34PM +, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote >>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:17:45AM +, Adam Fontenot via >>> aur-general

Re: [aur-general] LaTeX compilation error in makepkg

On 09/02/17 10:21 AM, Bennett Piater wrote: > Hi, > I resurrected beamer-theme-metropolis when aurphan showed me that it's > maintainer had orphaned it because I use it quite a lot. > > The upstream was recently updated, but I cannot get it to compile from > makepkg -- the latex compiler complains

Re: [aur-general] xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin unused shared libraries

On 04/12/16 08:03 AM, NicoHood wrote: > I am currently updating the xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin and have a few > namcap warnings to resolve. Mainly I am focusing this kind of warnings: > > xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin W: Unused shared library > '/usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.2' by file > ('usr/lib/xfce4/panel/

Re: [aur-general] bringing vis to [community]

On 17/02/16 12:09 PM, Christian Hesse wrote: > Hello everybody, > > vis aims to be a modern, legacy free, simple yet efficient vim-like > editor. > > That is what the readme says... I think this is a pretty good description. > As there is good documentation I suggest taking a look at the readme [0]

Re: [aur-general] Should TUs tolarate inapropiate behavior in the AUR?

On 13/02/16 04:12 PM, P. A. López-Valencia wrote: > El 13/02/2016 a las 3:12 p. m., Connor Behan escribió: >>> WE, Dave Blair and I, BOTH SAID THE HARASSMENT WAS DONE *PRIVATELY*, yet >>> you are asking for public proof? Your sharpness is Sheesh! >> He didn't s

Re: [aur-general] Should TUs tolarate inapropiate behavior in the AUR?

On 13/02/16 02:49 PM, P. A. López-Valencia wrote: > El 13/02/2016 a las 5:09 a. m., William Di Luigi escribió: >> Hi >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Ralf Mardorf >> wrote: >>> and at least two other maintainers felt harassed >>> by this maintainer >> Again, it's important to note that th

Re: [aur-general] Archive of AUR3 packages

On 13/08/15 02:28 PM, Chi Hsuan Yen wrote: > Dear Arch lovers, > > Recently lots of orphaned packages on AUR are deleted by Kyrias [1]. Are > AUR3 PKGBUILD tarballs kept somewhere? I'd like to re-upload packages I'm > using, but it takes too long time to write all PKGBUILDs from scratch. > > [1] >

Re: [aur-general] merging of aur3 comments into aur4

On 14/06/15 09:03 AM, Joakim Hernberg wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 14:01:45 +0200 Lukas Fleischer > wrote: >> We cannot merge comments easily as there would be conflicts with >> comments added on aur4.archlinux.org in the meantime. > Why would there be conflicts merging the comments? Not that I k

Re: [aur-general] How the "Popularity" value is being calculated for a package in the AUR4?

On 12/06/15 07:45 AM, Martti Kühne wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Magnus Therning > wrote: >> No, and valuable != popular :) >> >> Any popularity contest is going to be biased in some way. This is as >> good a bias as any other. >> > And let's leave completely out of focus that the bia

Re: [aur-general] Duplicate packages

On 06/04/15 08:46 PM, Justin Dray wrote: > Hi, > > I was just wondering what the process is when someone finds duplicate > pacakges? Assuming I'm not the owner of either package, but someone has > uploaded foo and foobar and both provide the same thing, what would be the > best we to get that resol

Re: [aur-general] [aur-dev] AUR 3.5.0 released

On 23/11/14 06:54 PM, David Phillips wrote: >> Consider this is the beginning of my efforts to deprecate mkaurball. Of >> of the pacman 4.2.0, mkaurball will be obsolete and will likely be >> replaced with a script which just yells at you to use makepkg instead. > I'm confused. Would someone like t

Re: [aur-general] Regex on search page

On 04/11/14 06:38 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:25:10 +1300 David Phillips wrote: I don't understand why some people are against such helpers. Without veering too far off this thread's topic, there's a large number of discussions on the web which cover this. So assumed there

Re: [aur-general] Renaming of xfce4-session-nosystemd

On 15/06/14 01:11 PM, Aaditya Bagga wrote: > > On 06/15/2014 11:50 PM, Aaditya Bagga wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Could the package xfce4-session-nosystemd be renamed to >> xfce4-session-consolekit ? >> >> Link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-session-nosystemd/ >> >> Thx. > > Pkg request to be mer

Re: [aur-general] Delete vim-notmuch

On 22/05/14 07:33 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Hi, > > I packaged this plug-in as a standalon vim plug-in, however, nowadays > it's bundled with the official 'notmuch-vim' package already. > > In theory I could update the package for the people that want to have > the latest and greatest version w

Re: [aur-general] Merge syslinux-firmware-git into syslinux-git

On 16/05/14 01:03 PM, Keshav Amburay wrote: > Hi, > > Please merge syslinux-firmware-git > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syslinux-firmware-git/ into syslinux-git > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syslinux-git/ . Thanks in advance. > > With Best Regards, > > Keshav Merged, thanks! signatu

Re: [aur-general] Requesting orphaning of AUR syslinux-git pkg

On 15/05/14 03:22 PM, Keshav Amburay wrote: > Hi, > > I request orphaning of syslinux-git > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syslinux-git/ pkg. I contacted the > current maintainer via comment on the AUR pkg page on Feb 8th 2014 and via > mail (quoted below) on April 24, 2014 with no response fro

Re: [aur-general] [Merge Request] flamerobin

On 21/04/14 12:09 PM, Berno Strik wrote: > Can you please > > Merge [1] into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flamerobin-git/ > > The last update of [1] was in April 2009. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flamerobin Merged, thanks :). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signat

Re: [aur-general] request remove:

On 20/04/14 12:10 PM, SpinFlo wrote: > Hi > > please remove > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth-plugin-scrawl-git/ > > > is now integrated in vapoursynth core > > greetings rm'd thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Please disown pdftk-bin / libgcj

On 19/04/14 05:50 AM, Florian Bruhin wrote: > * Connor Behan [2014-04-18 16:13:43 -0700]: >> On 18/04/14 01:28 AM, Florian Bruhin wrote: >>> pdftk-bin[1] and libgcj[2] have been out of date for months, and >>> libgcj doesn't build anymore. I'd like to

Re: [aur-general] Please disown pdftk-bin / libgcj

On 18/04/14 05:14 AM, Felix Yan wrote: > On Friday, April 18, 2014 10:28:55 Florian Bruhin wrote: >> pdftk-bin[1] and libgcj[2] have been out of date for months, and >> libgcj doesn't build anymore. I'd like to take them over. > Both disowned, thanks. > > Regards, > Felix Yan I scrolled right by th

Re: [aur-general] Please disown pdftk-bin / libgcj

On 18/04/14 01:28 AM, Florian Bruhin wrote: > pdftk-bin[1] and libgcj[2] have been out of date for months, and > libgcj doesn't build anymore. I'd like to take them over. > > I mailed the maintainer over 2 weeks ago, with no answer. > > Thanks! > > Florian > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

On 15/04/14 02:31 PM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia wrote: > Please merge ee into ee-editor < > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ee-editor/>. > Done, thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: aqualung-alsa

On 12/04/14 08:26 PM, Rob McCathie wrote: > Hi TU's & list, > > I'm the original submitter of aqualung-alsa. Nowadays i'm the > maintainer of aqualung and aqualung-svn too. > > aqualung-alsa can be deleted. > > For now people should be using the SVN package anyway, within which > i've left a commen

Re: [aur-general] [Merge Request] brother-dcp7060d-{cupswrapper, lpr}

On 07/04/14 02:53 PM, Berno Strik wrote: > Please merge > > [1] and [2] into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-dcp7060d > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-dcp7060d-cupswrapper > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-dcp7060d-lpr > > With regards Merged, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 03/04/14 12:46 PM, Ivaylo Kuzev wrote: > Hi, > > The package [1] is orphan and the features are provided by [2]. > Please remove [1]. > > [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-xft/[1] > [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-git/[2] > -- > Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo Merged [1] into

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: kdeplasma-applets-redshift

On 31/03/14 03:11 PM, thecatt...@gmx.com wrote: > Hi, any news about this? Still no response from the actual maintainer. > Regards. Disowned, thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: windowmaker-git

On 27/03/14 10:41 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > Please disown windowmaker-git > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/windowmaker-git/ > > -> not updated in over a year > -> maintainer responding to neither comments nor email > -> I have updated PKGBUILD ready to go > > --brian Disowned, thank

Re: [aur-general] celestia-addon-.* merge requests

On 02/01/14 07:17 AM, SanskritFritz wrote: > I have renamed several packages of mine. > Please merge the following packages: > > celestia-addon-apollo-soyuz -> celestia-addon-apollo_soyuz > celestia-addon-atlantis-2 -> celestia-addon-atlantis_2 > celestia-addon-deep-impact -> celestia-addon-deep_im

Re: [aur-general] Merge compiz-core-dev into compiz-dev

On 27/10/13 01:18 AM, Johannes Löthberg wrote: > Hey, > > Upstream doesn't call it compiz-core anymore, the compiz-core-dev > package hasn't been updated in over a year and is orphaned. compiz-dev > on the other hand is named after the current upstream name and is up to > date, could a TU merge com

Re: [aur-general] Delete sixpair-bluez

On 26/10/13 11:01 PM, Justin Dray wrote: > Can we please get sixpair-bluez removed: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sixpair-bluez/ > > It has been out of date for many years and there is already a sixpair > package that is updated. Merged into sixpair. Thanks. signature.asc Description: Ope

Re: [aur-general] disown request: fuse-zip

On 26/10/13 08:16 PM, 徐林 wrote: > I send E-mail to 2 weeks ago but get no replay at > all. Disowned, thanks. Please include a link next time :). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Merge bugseverywhere into bugseverywhere-git

On 26/10/13 06:33 PM, Alfredo Palhares wrote: > Hello fellow archinians. > > Please merge bugseverywhere[0] into bugseverywhere-git[1] the > "stable" version of be is totally out of date, git is the only option. > > [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bugseverywhere/ > [1] https://aur.archlinux

Re: [aur-general] museek packages cleanup.

On 26/10/13 01:17 PM, Karol Woźniak wrote: > Hi all, > it's cleaning time! > > As museek+ sources were recently moved from svn to git, I thought it would > be good time to have a look at our packages for them. > > Therefore, please merge museekd-svn [1] and museeq-svn [2] into museekd-git > [3] and

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

On 23/10/13 12:20 AM, Nuno Araujo wrote: > Hi > > Can you please merge python2-virtkey [1] into python-virtkey [2]? > > python-virtkey is now a split package that builds binaries both for > python2 and python3. > > Thank you > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-virtkey/ > [2] https://

Re: [aur-general] Merge grub-bzr into grub-git.

On 22/10/13 12:05 PM, Keshav Padram Amburay wrote: > Hi, > GRUB upstream has migrated from BZR to GIT > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2013-10/msg00133.html . > Therefore please merge grub-bzr [1] into grub-git [2]. > > Please note I was the original uplader/maintainer of grub-bzr

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: tmux-git

On 09/10/13 04:09 PM, William Giokas wrote: > - Forwarded message from William Giokas - > > Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 06:23:37 -0500 > From: William Giokas > To: Dmitry Korzhevin > Subject: Updating tmux-git to current vcs format > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) > > Hello, > > Do you

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request: haroopad

On 06/10/13 09:55 PM, 蒲肖肖 wrote: > Hi, > > Would you please orphan haroopad[1]? > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haroopad/ > > The package doesn't build and is out of date for nearly 2 months. I've mailed > the maintainer > of this package 2 weeks ago, but did not receive any resopnse.

Re: [aur-general] merge request

On 06/10/13 04:43 PM, Nuno Araujo wrote: > Please merge python2-uinput [1] into python-uinput [2]. > > python-uinput is now a split package that supports both the python2 and > python3 version. > > Thank you > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-uinput/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request: zsh-syntax-highlighting-git

On 06/10/13 02:57 PM, Sam Stuewe wrote: > Hey all, > > I pinged the list a week ago about [1] noting that I had contacted the > maintainer with no response, but that it had only been a week since I > had contacted them. A second week has passed and I still have not > received any word from the main

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

On 22/09/13 02:35 PM, Haffmans, Wouter wrote: > Hello, > > The package doxgen-git[1] was uploaded with a typo in the package name > (I've replaced it with doxygen-git[2] - the "y" was missing). Please > remove the doxgen-git variant. > > Thanks. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxgen-git

Re: [aur-general] fontforge-git disown

On 22/09/13 12:48 AM, Arthur Țițeică wrote: > Please disown fontforge-git as it no longer builds and the maintainer didn't > respond to comments in a long time. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fontforge-git/ > > Thanks. > Disowned, thank-you. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital si

Re: [aur-general] Merge python-lineprofiler to python2-lineprofiler

On 06/09/13 10:20 PM, Lester B wrote: > Please python-lineprofiler[1] to python2-lineprofiler[2]. Thanks. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-lineprofiler/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-lineprofiler/ Merged, thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital sig

Re: [aur-general] Deletion and merge requests (long list)

On 26/08/13 09:58 AM, Lex Black wrote: > Huge list incoming :) > > Following packages are out of date and orphaned and couldn't be revived, > as their source is dead, or better PKGBuilds are available. > > -- > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xspice/ > Should be merged with https://aur.archl

Re: [aur-general] Disown request

On 25/08/13 09:45 AM, Iván Pulido wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to request to disown the package dislin in AUR > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dislin/ . The package has been > flagged out of date for over three months now and I already sent a > fix/update for the PKGBUILD (with the username "m

Re: [aur-general] [100% off-topic] What happened to the arch general mailing list?

On 17/08/13 03:00 AM, Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Magnus Therning > wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:26:09AM -0500, Doug Newgard wrote: >>> It's a moderated list and the normal moderator is on >>> vacation:https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-de

Re: [aur-general] MSN Messenger and Google Reader

On 16/08/13 07:17 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > Windows Live Messenger (formerly MSN Messenger) has been deprecated. > Is it OK to remove the various MSN clients from the AUR? > What about programs relying on the discontinued Google Reader? Google Reader yes, MSN no. The servers are supposed to sti

Re: [aur-general] Please rename vodafone-mccd to v-mobile-broadband

On 04/08/13 12:20 AM, Jonas Heinrich wrote: > Hey, > I would like to ask if you could rename the package vodafone-mccd [1] to > v-mobile-broadband, since the author of the project renamed it [2] > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vodafone-mccd/ > [2] > https://github.com/andrewbird/vodafone

Re: [aur-general] Please merge gtkparasite

On 25/07/13 04:37 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: > The package gtkparasite [1] is pulling a tarball of git master, making it a > duplicate of gtkparasite-git [2]. Please merge [1] into [2]. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtkparasite/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtkparasite-git/

Re: [aur-general] TU application

On 20/07/13 12:40 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Connor Behan > wrote: >> On 20/07/13 09:53 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >>> 4) Speed >>> It avoid pacman to checks version for each deps. This save a lot of >>> useless compu

Re: [aur-general] TU application

On 20/07/13 09:53 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Dicebot wrote: >> It is nothing of real importance but question is, what harm does >> explicit versioning do? > Interesting question because it underlines some benefits of being a > rolling release for their maint

Re: [aur-general] Please delete projects

On 14/07/13 02:09 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > Hi, > > Please delete my AUR project that are not needed anymore > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tarantool/ - tarantool-git should > be used (upstream priject uses weird git tagging policy) > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tup-lua-git/ lua

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On 06/07/13 04:13 PM, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: > On behalf of the maintainer patryk, > I request deletion of > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exfat/ > which is a duplicate of > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exfat-git/ > > There are no votes and no comments worth to preserve. Deleted, thanks

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 22/06/13 11:12 PM, Jakub Klinkovský wrote: > Hi, from [1]: > Support for the features in xf86-video-fbdev-for-displaylink and udlfb from > the AUR have been included upstream and are no longer needed. Use the > official > packages instead. > > xf86-video-fbdev-for-displaylink [2] has a ma

Re: [aur-general] Merge requests

On 22/06/13 02:44 AM, Sébastien Leduc wrote: > Hello, > > Could you please merge: > python2-pipeline [1] into python2-grapevine [2] > and > python-pipeline [3] into python-grapevine [4] ? > > The project changed its name upstream so 'grapevine' replaces 'pipeline'. > > Thanks. > > 1: https://aur.ar

Re: [aur-general] AUR cleanup policy

On 19/06/13 12:53 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Xyne wrote: >> On 2013-06-18 13:48 +0200 >> Karol Blazewicz wrote: >> >>> What's the policy wrt to packages that have been submitted years ago >>> and are neither developed upstream nor maintained in the AUR since >>>

Re: [aur-general] Merge libefivar-git into efivar-git

On 17/06/13 01:14 PM, Keshav Padram wrote: > Hi, > PLease merge libefivar-git [1] into efivar-git [2]. The packagewas > renamed since upstream was renamed from libefivar to efivar. Thanks in > advance. > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libefivar-git/ > [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/

Re: [aur-general] clementine-rc

On 17/06/13 12:05 PM, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clementine-rc/ > has been superseded by the final release in community > > I suggest removal from the AUR Removed, thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] rtmpdump-svn vs. rtmpdump-git

On 17/06/13 11:29 AM, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: > We have these packages > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtmpdump-git/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtmpdump-svn/ > > and both giving the same upstream url: > http://rtmpdump.mplayerhq.hu/ > > where it says: Download the source: > *git clon

Re: [aur-general] Merging of comp-scale-svn with comp-scale-git and engage-svn with engage-git

On 17/06/13 10:01 AM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: > Dear TU(s), > > the recent move of these packages' VCS from svn to git means that - as > the maintainer - I had to create two new packages for them (as per > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines). I would > like to request for t

Re: [aur-general] [DELETE] ttwm

On 11/06/13 09:57 AM, Jesse McClure wrote: > TUs, > > Accidentally removing the tarball from github is a good indicator its > time to officially remove ttwm. Any ttwm users who've missed the memo, > should switch to alopex-git. > > Please remove ttwm from the AUR: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packa

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: mesa-r300g-xorg

On 10/06/13 02:29 PM, Martin Stolpe wrote: > Support for the Xorg state tracker for at least the r300 was dropped some > time ago: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTI3NDA > > > 2013/6/10 Connor Behan > >> On 10/06/13 07:48 AM, Martin Stolpe wrote: &g

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: mesa-r300g-xorg

On 10/06/13 07:48 AM, Martin Stolpe wrote: > Hello, > > can someone please delete the mesa-r300g-xorg package. The xorg state > tracker is no longer devloped (VMware switched to XA state tracker and AMD > is using GLAMOR now). > > > Regards AMD is using glamor for radeonsi. Isn't this package stil

Re: [aur-general] remove savex

On 08/06/13 01:39 PM, Alexej Magura wrote: > Could yall please remove savex, I was so excited about it finally > working and everything that I got carried away and added it to the AUR > way ahead of schedule. I both maintain the AUR package thingy for > savex and develop savex. > > here's a link h

Re: [aur-general] ocamlnet

On 06/06/13 06:08 PM, oliver wrote: > Hello, > > I just marked it as outdated... > ...then i saw that it is orphaned and adopted it. > > It has 28 votes... pacman -Ss ocamlnet does not > tell me that it is officcially now. > > Or is this planned already? > If not, I will update the package durin

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On 06/06/13 02:14 PM, foalsrock wrote: > This hasn't gotten any attention.. I'd appreciate if a TU could take care > of it. > Thanks > On Jun 2, 2013 7:37 PM, "foalsrock" wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to request deletion of the following packages which have been >> submitted and maintained by me.

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: libgee-0.6

On 27/05/13 07:27 PM, Masato Hashimoto wrote: > Hi, > > Please remove libgee-0.6[1]. > It's idential to libgee06 on Extra. > I forgot to confirm the legacy version of libgee is existent before > submitting. > > Thx > > [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgee-0.6/ Deleted, thanks. signature

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request [5/27]

On 27/05/13 01:14 PM, Limao Luo wrote: > The following packages > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/acroread/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dosbox-svn/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/violet/ > > are all broken atm, and have been for a while. The maintainer's email > bounces, and acr

Re: [aur-general] AUR package removal request: nginx-spdy

On 27/04/13 03:25 PM, Gavin Lloyd wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nginx-spdy/ > > The only purpose was to provide the dev version of nginx with the (then > beta) SPDY module. As this has been merged into the stable releases as of > 1.4.0, which is already available in [community], this

Re: [aur-general] Disown Request: Joomla

On 25/04/13 05:17 PM, Jonas Heinrich wrote: > Hello, > I would like to adopt the package joomla [1], which is flagged > out-of-date since 22.02.13 and last updated on 22.10.2012. I tried to > contact on 17.04.13 but did not recieved any answer yet. > If possible, please orphan it for me. > Best reg

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: pcsx2-bin

On 17/04/13 08:21 PM, Rafael Ferreira wrote: > pcsx2-bin [1] is around for sometime in AUR, but IMHO it is no use > anymore since pcsx2 [2] went to community repo, thanks to Maxime > Gauduin. I presume that no user objects deleting pcsx2-bin as I > commented twice about deleting in pcsx2-bin's comm

Re: [aur-general] Orphan/merge request (Was: Merge request [Apr 14])

On 13/04/13 10:19 PM, Limao Luo wrote: > On 04/14/2013 01:10 AM, Limao Luo wrote: >> Please merge >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libticables2/ >> into >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libticables/ >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packa

Re: [aur-general] Please delete blender-collada

On 12/04/13 02:18 PM, Michael Wünsch wrote: > Hi TUs, > I am the maintainer of blender-collada. Can you please delete the > package since main blender now has collada built-in? > > Thanks! Deleted, along with the -svn version. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: jlatexmath-fop

On 30/03/13 11:53 AM, Victor Dmitriyev wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jlatexmath-fop/ > This package is a tiny plunig for jlatexmath. There are tons of single file packages in the AUR. I don't think this is a good reason by itself. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signatu

Re: [aur-general] Enlightenment merge requests

On 28/03/13 10:40 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: > **MERGE** > > Enlightenment is switching from SVN to Git. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/econnman-svn/ INTO > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/econnman-git/ > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/etrophy-svn/ INTO > https://aur.archlinux.org/pa

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: zebra

On 28/03/13 08:47 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > Please delete: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zebra > > => website no longer exists > => zebra has long been replaced by quagga > > --brian Deleted, thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: xmlrpc-c-abyss

On 27/03/13 07:24 PM, Jason St. John wrote: > xmlrpc-c-abyss[1] was created to provide an abyss-enabled version of > xmlrpc-c[2], but as of [3], the package in [community] has enabled > abyss support. xmlrpc-c-abyss is no longer needed and can be deleted. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/

Re: [aur-general] TU application from graysky - voting period

On 24/03/13 12:30 PM, Xyne wrote: > Sébastien Luttringer wrote: > >>> Objections were raised and then countered with arguments. If anyone felt >>> that >>> the objections were still valid after that then they should have replied >>> with >>> their reasons. That is the point of the discussion peri

Re: [aur-general] Request of disowning the package tuxcut

On 16/03/13 10:14 PM, BlissSam wrote: > Dear list, > > I noticed the package tuxcut has never been updated since the first > submission 3 years ago. > > The tuxcut package should have been updated to 4.1 but the PKGBUILD stayed at > 3.2. In addition, the source code linked to that PKGBUILD has be

Re: [aur-general] Using git as a backend for the AUR

On 16/03/13 05:18 PM, Tai-Lin Chu wrote: > 1. 5M is probably an overkill. I think 1-2M is usually enough. There > are simply patches and PKGBUILD > 2. https://github.com/libgit2/php-git > 3. I can help if anyone needs to code in php > > side notes: why dont we have package deletion for maintainer??

Re: [aur-general] Resigning as TU

On 16/03/13 01:16 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > Hey all, > > In the past couple of months I've been less active with Arch due to time > limitations, and I feel like it's been even longer since I've really > been active as a TU. I don't see this as something that's going to > change in the near future.

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: datovka, dslib, sudsds

On 15/03/13 02:20 AM, Martin Filip wrote: > Hi, > > I'm requesting orphanage of > > package: datovka [1] > and it's dependencies: dslib [2], sudsds [3] > > Owner's email is inaccessible (domain expired some time ago) and > software is out of date. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/datovka/

Re: [aur-general] Fighting spam on the AUR

On 13/03/13 06:57 PM, oliver wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:56:35AM +0100, oliver wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:31:47PM -0400, Allen Li wrote: >> [...] >>> Limiting repeated actions also sounds good (if someone really needs to, >>> e.g., flag a lot of packages, they can just drop a requ

Re: [aur-general] merge picard-plugins-lastfmplus into picard-plugins

On 13/03/13 05:06 AM, Johannes Dewender wrote: > Please merge > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/picard-plugins-lastfmplus/ > into > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/picard-plugins/ > > The lastfmplus plugin is now included in the base plugin > package. > > -- > JonnyJD Merged, thanks! sign

Re: [aur-general] TU application from graysky

On 11/03/13 05:52 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:24:31PM -0400, member graysky wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi All. Inspired by Allan's talk @ SINFO XX, I decided to throw my >> hat into the ring and formally apply to be a TU. My linux his

Re: [aur-general] AUR Maintenance

On 01/03/13 06:02 AM, Martti Kühne wrote: > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Connor Behan wrote: > [...] >> INSERT INTO `PackageComments` VALUES (17,46,68,'ruby bindings for >> fastcgi',1113164127,68),(28,69,65,'A countdown timer applet for the >> GNOME p

Re: [aur-general] AUR Maintenance

On 28/02/13 01:54 PM, Phillip Smith wrote: > I'd be willing to try and assist with this too. What is the format of > that backup file? > > It is a 46MB text file of SQL commands; the kind you would get by running mysqldump. It only has 462 lines, but some of them are very long. The important lines

[aur-general] AUR Maintenance

Some of you may remember the "lost comments" fiasco of 2010. When this happened, a file on sigurd was created "aur-20100205-1859.sql.fixed2.xz" with AUR comments that had been lost. I volunteered (on the "mailin list") to help manually restore them to the AUR [1]. Since I did not know SQL or how to

Re: [aur-general] TU apply counselor

On 25/02/13 08:09 AM, Rudy Matela wrote: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trusted_Users#How_to_become_TU.3F > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Jorge Barroso > wrote: >> Hi, I'm Jorge Barroso (jorge_barroso in the AUR), I've been an Arch user for >> some time and I've learned a lot of thing

Re: [aur-general] deletion request

On 23/02/13 10:04 AM, David Adler wrote: > please delete chino-preset-default, it ceased to > exist as an installable package. > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/chino-preset-default/ > > thanks. How does it cease to exist? The source link is not broken and the PKGBUILD looks file to me. sign

Re: [aur-general] [Request] merge libdvdcss-svn into libdvdcss-git

On 17/02/13 01:00 PM, SpinFlo wrote: > please. merge libdvdcss-svn into libdvdcss-git > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libdvdcss-svn > into > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libdvdcss-git > > because now un upstream migrate from SVN to GIT > > greetings Done, thanks. signature.asc Des

Re: [aur-general] remove a comment from dolfin-bzr

On 16/02/13 12:55 PM, Myles English wrote: > Hello, > > Please would a TU remove the comment by lecio at > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dolfin-bzr/ ? > > it is overly long, doesn't add anything to the package and looks untidy. > I emailed him a few weeks ago to ask him to request its remova

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

On 13/02/13 05:30 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Hello, > > Please merge sandy-hg [1] into sandy-git [2]. The maintainer and > author agreed to this > in the AUR comments of [1]. > > Best Regards > Stefan > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sandy-hg/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/san

Re: [aur-general] Delete xbmc-pulse and merge morituri-svn -> -git

On 10/02/13 02:25 PM, Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen wrote: > Ahoy, > > Deletion: > XBMC has been shipped with PulseAudio support for a little while, so > xbmc-pulse[1] is not needed anymore. > > Merge: > I took over maintainership of the morituri VCS package and moved it > from Subversion to Git, so p

Re: [aur-general] Merge perl6-junction into perl-perl6-junction

On 03/02/13 05:31 AM, Konrad Borowski wrote: > perl-perl6-junction is correct name. It isn't Perl 6 module called > Junction (not that Perl 6 has such module, considering it's builtin > language feature), but Perl 5 module called Perl6::Junction. Makes sense. Merged! signature.asc Description:

Re: [aur-general] merge freecol-svn into freecol-git

On 02/02/13 11:43 AM, Lone_Wolf wrote: > Hi, > > Freecol project has switched from svn to git. > > please merge [1] into [2] > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freecol-svn/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freecol-git/ > > Lone_Wolf > Merged, thank-you! signature.asc Description:

Re: [aur-general] Remove libsc?

On 01/02/13 09:50 AM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Karol Blazewicz > wrote: >> The project's name is libbsc and not libsc, libsc PKGBUILD hasn't been >> updated in a while, while libbsc PKGBUILD provides the latest version. >> Both were submitted by the same person an

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD removal request

On 29/01/13 04:06 PM, Federico Cinelli wrote: > analog-vu-meter-plugin > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/analog-vu-meter-plugin/) > replaced by > audacious-vumeter (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/audacious-vumeter/) > > > Merged, thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital sig

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

On 29/01/13 01:18 PM, Xavier Corredor Llano wrote: > Hi > > please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ncl-rangs/ > > because It was renamed to: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ncl-highres/ > > thanks > Done, thank-you. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

  1   2   >