Re: [aur-general] Request Removal of 'dupekill' package

2012-09-09 Thread Daniel Campbell
> On 9 September 2012 05:49, Daniel Campbell wrote: > > Hello. Please remove the "dupekill" package from the AUR. > > It seems someone already removed it. Anyway, please submit reasons & > link to the package in future requests. > > Lukas Sorry for not i

[aur-general] Request Removal of 'dupekill' package

2012-09-08 Thread Daniel Campbell
Hello. Please remove the "dupekill" package from the AUR.

Re: [aur-general] fixing dupekill

2012-04-09 Thread Daniel Campbell
Hugo: thanks for pointing that out. I had asked about it on the forum and figured there was a way to work with it that way. How would I handle the fact that the tarball would have the readme and PKGBUILD in it already? Would they simply be deleted with the src directory after a 'makepkg -c'? Se

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal

2012-04-09 Thread Daniel Campbell
rol Blazewicz Sent: 2012-04-09 17:40:55 Subject: Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > Most systems already do the paper-trailing for us. They're known as logs. Yup. Even if regular users don't have access to said log

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal

2012-04-09 Thread Daniel Campbell
12 at 8:16 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> It would also contribute less clutter to the mailing list and less hassle >> for people that make innocuous mistakes like mine. Bureaucracy cripples >> everything. > Yes, it's annoying (and inefficient and illogical) to require s

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal

2012-04-09 Thread Daniel Campbell
Yes, it's annoying (and inefficient and illogical) to require someone to sign up to another service to ask for something to be done on the service they're having issue with. Departmentalizing things is a sign of bureaucracy. Most people dislike it in government, hospitals, business, and other in

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal

2012-04-09 Thread Daniel Campbell
I would contribute if a. My dev machine had internet and b. If i thought my work had a chance of being considered. Given that I'm not a TU or a regular among the devs, my work would not likely be accepted. I guess things will stay as they are until someone important dislikes them. I'm not one f

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal

2012-04-09 Thread Daniel Campbell
It is simple, actually. When a user uploads a package, they should be given rights to remove it if need be. Simply claiming an orphan wouldn't grant the rights. That way only mods and original uploaders would get permission to remove packages and it wouldn't be prone to abuse. It would also cont

[aur-general] Request for Package Removal

2012-04-08 Thread Daniel Campbell
I uploaded a package that has the source included. The wiki mentioned binaries but nothing about languages like bash or Python that don't need to be compiled. Anyway, since I don't have a place to host it and fix the PKGBUILD, it needs to be removed so the AUR's not marred, I suppose. The packag