I'll give this a go, a few dependency chains to work through, so will
take a few days/weeks depending on my availability.
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 02:40, Tomas Krizek via aur-general
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to ask if you'd consider adopting knot-resolver from AUR [1]
> into the community repo.
On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 at 16:56, JustKidding via aur-general
wrote:
>
> Just to add, could one become a TU in a pseudo-anonymous way? As in,
> just be known in nickname only. Or does one have to give their real name
> in order to become one? Looks like everyone has their real name in the
> wiki.
removed.
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 at 14:33, Amin Vakil wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 00:01, asm0dey via aur-general
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm looking for any description on how arch linux repository should be
> organized.
> I've found way to publish built packages to github pages, but it's
> absolutely not enough to just put them somewhere. It looks
Cleaned up.
Thanks.
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 09:44, Luca Weiss via aur-general
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I found those spam accounts:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Aryan_007
> https://aur.archlinux.org/account/salmaotto
> https://aur.archlinux.org/account/janetjackson
>
Comments deleted and user suspended.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 09:18, Michael Laß wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> today the user vedantydv123 added nonsense comments to a few packages:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/account/vedantydv123/comments
>
> The user doesn’t have any packages or meaningful comments.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 23:33, Florian Dejonckheere via aur-general
wrote:
> The account anke99 [1] is leaving some spam comments on various packages
Thanks for the report!
Cleaned up.
On Wed, 6 Mar. 2019, 18:54 James Knight via aur-general, <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> From my past experience with downloading versioned tarballs from GitHub
> is that there is no guarantee that the fetched package will always be
> the same hash (useless this is something that has
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 21:03, Morten Linderud via aur-general
wrote:
>
> Yo!
>
> The vote is over and the results are inn!
>
> Yes: 22
> No: 15
> Abstain: 12
> Participation:89.09%
>
> Congratulations! I have updated the AUR account.
>
> Please follow the
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 at 16:40, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> If you take a closer look at the manual page for pkg-config, it actually
> says the exact opposite, defining "--libs" as "linker flags". In fact,
> there are even three dedicated *subvariants* to get, depending on your
> highly customized needs,
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 at 17:23, Eli Schwartz wrote:>
> I'm finding it very hard to imagine why c89, game developers,
> microcontroller users, or people who care about performance would be at
> all opposed to distributing an inert text file. I guess Windows users
> might feel like it is a waste, but
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 18:50, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 12/11/18 6:19 PM, Daurnimator wrote:
> >> If lua does not officially compile a C++ version, it is the job of
> >> Debian to both provide their own pkg-config files, and modify lua to
> >> build using C++.
> &g
LUA should be
> > dismissed. [3]
>
> This is relevant, I believe, given that daurnimator appears to be a
> member of both the lua and luarocks organizations on github, and
> presumably has some degree of influence.
Note that I am only a reviewer/maintainer for both orgs, I do no
. On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 14:44, Eli Schwartz via aur-general
wrote:
> Do you mean they removed a pc rather than an echo target?
Yes, sorry for confusion.
> If lua does not officially compile a C++ version, it is the job of
> Debian to both provide their own pkg-config files, and modify lua to
>
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 13:28, Eli Schwartz via aur-general
wrote:
> Can you point me to a bug report or pull request or mailing list
> discussion or other form of discussion in the lua community where the
> topic of pkg-config has been previously discussed and rejected as too
> political? Because
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 13:18, Eli Schwartz via aur-general
wrote:
> Lua *does* provide a "make pc" target.
Only lua 5.1 does, it was removed in the lua 5.2 release. Due to
disagreements between debian and fedora lua package maintainers about
what it should contain.
> Admittedly, this target is
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 12:47, Ivy Foster via aur-general
wrote:
> Yikes!
>
> One ugly but workable solution could be to conditionally set variables
> in a Makefile. For instance:
>
> ifeq ($(OS),Windows_NT) # for Windows versions >= NT
> LUA :=
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 12:25, Ivy Foster via aur-general
wrote:
> Looking at arcan, why do you break it up into so many different
> sub-packages? I understand that they provide different tools, but
> typically Arch just packages toolsuites together unless there's a
> compelling reason to separate
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 12:04, Robin Broda via aur-general
wrote:
>
> On 12/11/18 9:00 PM, Daurnimator wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 11:45, Alad Wenter via aur-general
> > wrote:
> >> 2. You have some AUR packages for LUA modules of your own making, yet
> >
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 11:45, Alad Wenter via aur-general
wrote:
> 1. When I look at LUA modules, I see that most are available on
> "luarocks", which is apparently a package manager for LUA. Can you
> leverage this to make more LUA modules available on Arch?
Note that it's "Lua" not LUA.
I'd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 02:20, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote:
> I confirm my sponsorship of Daurnimator!
Thank you for sponsoring!
Also, I was just informed that a TU application should contain links :D
Me:
AUR profile: ht
ap
- tig
Regards,
Daurnimator
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEHiYzy/cw8s5ux6twRbQpqPnZ0ioFAlv+qPYACgkQRbQpqPnZ
0ireMBAAg61vyyRBh0vbib22kCvfucbqFjzYV/E1gkgDpFo27tgZmBLvysA4AfhU
wJQoyCDYJsGMzDC9sLmydmv9GG/QDtySYNia5HHglA8SE/EaNotS8lp1YEjRK0Pu
GYpwksjQXRxexDvESsAdNatEh97/6SLbjy3zwGD+EJ7lMQ4L
22 matches
Mail list logo
