>
> I had it configured correctly to use the new key. However, since it wasn't
> the primary key for the box, it wasn't transmitted for authentication. I
> just changed my aur profile key to the primary key and it worked without
> having to mess with the agent nonsense.
Might not be a good idea
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Bruno Pagani bruno.pag...@ens-lyon.org
wrote:
Well, the first email states Kyrias did this…
Le 11 août 2015 10:15:42 GMT+02:00, David Phillips dbphillip...@gmail.com
a écrit :
A certain TU went around deleting orphaned stuff… won't name them
though ;-)
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Lukas Fleischer lfleisc...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be quite some confusion about the package migration
process and about package deletion. I would like to clarify my point of
view. Hopefully it serves as a basis for discussion (i.e. technical
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:23 PM, David Phillips dbphillip...@gmail.com
wrote:
I suppose some may subscribe to the view that if someone wants it
badly enough, they'll submit, maintain and stick with it.
Exactly.
Several notification emails were sent directly rather than via aur-general.
Yes, but that isn't the same thing. Being subscribed to the list would
(should?) have made people aware of most of the issues surrounding the
migration, including the motivations behind it and the expectations of
lastly I just tried your version of .ssh/config and the exact error
message I got was:
git clone ssh://a...@aur.archlinux.org/foobar.git
Cloning into 'foobar'...
The authenticity of host 'aur.archlinux.org (5.9.250.164)' can't be
established.
ECDSA key fingerprint is
Wow, with a name ending in Morozov, you sure doth protest to much.
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Daniel Micay danielmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/07/15 04:01 PM, Igor Morozov wrote:
That's right, I messed up. Instead of typing fastmail.com, I typed
fastmai.com. And now there is no way I
And I just top posted, like a fool.
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 5:41 PM, David Kaylor dpkay...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow, with a name ending in Morozov, you sure doth protest to much.
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Daniel Micay danielmi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 26/07/15 04:01 PM, Igor Morozov wrote
Since he's doing it as part of his job, supposedly, then I really can't
see any reason at all that they wouldn't open up port 22 to just to luna
for him.
Yea, who knows. Like I said earlier, I do feel for the guy.
I'm rather sure that he never actually said that maintaining the AUR
package was part of his job, just avoided the question by saying that he
worked on the software. (Though I'm too lazy to check now.)
I just double checked, and this is what he wrote:
2. I currently maintain the
Do you have permission from your employer to user their infrastructure (eg:
computers, network) to work on contributions to ArchLinux?
If not, they *may* own the IP related to the PKGBUILDs, or any extra
scripts
you include (in most jurisdictions, if you write a 15 line script, it's
Asking for a response from the OP: Do you not have other network access
available to maintain your AUR packages? More to the point, are you
maintaining packages on AUR as part of your official responsibilities? Or
just in spare time? Leaving aside, for the moment, all other arguments
regarding
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Lukas Fleischer lfleisc...@archlinux.org
wrote:
No. It also does not register a new AUR account or setup your Internet
connection. It submits packages to the AUR. As I said before, generating
and adding the key is a tiny one-time process and automating it
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Eli Schwartz eschwart...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well, sure, git is fun. :)
But tarball uploads means maintainers wouldn't have to go through any more
hoops than they do already. Primarily, I am wondering what people who
refuse to learn git *just* to contribute to
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Eli Schwartz eschwart...@gmail.com
wrote:
Use the `./aurpublish` script. It controls everything. Today I added a
speedup option to save the subtree (it duplicates all those commits
though).
My goal is that *everything* should be abstracted and just leave
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com
wrote:
Em 11-06-2015 17:56, Remi Gacogne escreveu:
(FDE and strong passphrases only buy you some time to do it).
In the case of stolen/lost, it buy you a lot of time. Or you are aware of
some cryptanalisys development
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Eli Schwartz eschwart...@gmail.com wrote:
That still requires packagers to go through several new hoops.
And I can see the benefit of allowing tarball uploads for the same reason
that the AUR3 included a web interface for adding new packages (rather than
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Phillip Smith li...@fukawi2.nl wrote:
Has anyone written an ELI5 document for us simpletons who only know how to
push, pull and commit, but would still like to be able to have a single
repository of PKGBUILD's we are responsible for?
How about a simpleton
A user is requesting that the md5deep package name be changed to hashdeep,
which I agree seems consistent with the project maintainer's wishes, since
all development of md5deep has been moved to github under the hashdeep
name. Do any Trusted Users have strong feelings about this or advice for
me?
).
Steven.
[1]
https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-May/028617.html
On 6 June 2014 15:29, David Kaylor dpkay...@gmail.com wrote:
A user is requesting that the md5deep package name be changed to
hashdeep,
which I agree seems consistent with the project maintainer's
Maybe I should try as well, see what he prefers, if anything.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Johannes Löthberg johan...@kyriasis.com
wrote:
On 06/06, Steven Honeyman wrote:
OK, I'm not a TU (yet?)... but as the person that contacted you
probably did so because of a post to this ML of mine
21 matches
Mail list logo
