Note: your email reminded me to commit to what I had been preparing to
do for a while, but was not the reason I withdrew my TU application.
On 2019-03-04 , Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote:
> I wanted to poke you how things are going? Would love to see my review
> being incorporated, it took q
A week of discussion and time to reflect later, and I'd like to withdraw
my application for trusted user.
I had hesitated to apply to become a TU for some time due to various
personal concerns, some of which were reaffirmed during the ensuing
discussion, and those which weren't directly reaffirmed
The AUR is not community. The expectations are higher for trusted users
- hence the trust. Naturally responding to emails, keeping up with new
releases, etc, is part of the role. That's why it's a *role* - it serves
to define the responsibilities. There is no role for AUR package
maintainer outside
On 2019-02-27 10:42 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> I guess the difference between PyPI and Github sources could be
> clarified, but really I'd much rather upstreams would get in the habit
> of using a MANIFEST.in which ensured the license and testsuite was
> correctly included in the sou
On 2019-02-28 2:22 AM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote:
> > For the AUR I don't keep up with upstream releases, I just wait for
> > someone to mark the package as outdated. For Alpine Linux I use a
> > combination of subscribing to the upstream -announce mailing list and
> > subscribing to Gi
On 2019-02-26 11:37 PM, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
> I would also chip in with the following from early 2017:
>
> https://github.com/swaywm/sway/issues/1227
>
> (I am also not in any sort of witch hunt, just thought this would be
> relevant.)
It should go without saying that I regret
On 2019-02-27 2:09 AM, alad via aur-general wrote:
> [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18156980
I said my piece in the thread and I encourage anyone concerned to read
through the comments here. For what it's worth, the concerns are over
incidents which occured 4-5 years ago.
> [3]
> http
Hey Christian!
On 2019-02-25 6:21 PM, Christian Rebischke via aur-general wrote:
> 1. Can you describe in a few sentences how you build your packages for
> the AUR and for your own repository?
For the AUR: I just run makepkg -i and makepkg --printsrcinfo >
.SRCINFO. I keep it pretty casual for t
Thanks for all the feedback! I went through and cleaned up all of my AUR
packages - something a wiser man would have done before submitting the
TU application.
Note that in some cases I disowned packages I was no longer interested
in maintaining, and in the case of vgo both disowned and filed a
de
On 2019-02-24 7:09 PM, Drew DeVault wrote:
> P.S. You pointed out on IRC that my first email wasn't signed, so I
> signed this one to be sure.
Man. I have this habit of writing the whole email, then reading through
and making edits and forgetting about any important promsises I made
like signatur
On 2019-02-24 7:01 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> Your application sounds interesting and I generally admire your
> open-source work.
Thank you!
> What is samurai, exactly? It claims to be "a ninja-compatible build
> tool" but I'm not sure what the comparative advantages are supposed
Hiya! Jerome convinced me to finally apply for TU, and Sven-Hendrik
agreed to co-sponsor my application (both Cc'd).
I'm a generalist that works on free software full time. I maintain the
following AUR packages:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?SeB=m&K=sircmpwn
I also maintain a third-party A
Following up from IRC. Hello!
I run a public build service which has Arch Linux support and uses yay
to install AUR packages when requested. I recently had some users
running up against the AUR rate limit.
The current rate limit window (1 day) seems a bit strict. Would it be
possible to apply the
13 matches
Mail list logo
