Re: [aur-general] forgot password

On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 09:40:27PM +0800, Yi Qingliang wrote: > sorry, I input the wrong email address, it should be > niqingliang2...@tom.com, not gmail.com. I cannot find an AUR account for this address either. I suggest that you try registering a new account with either of the two

Re: [aur-general] forgot password

On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 01:46:34PM +0800, Yi Qingliang via aur-general wrote: > Hello, I have forgot the password, can't login on aur.archlinux.org, > after fill email, it said: It appears that there is no account with the email address you used to post here. Have you tried registering a new

Re: [aur-general] unsubscription issues (was: TU resignation - Lukas Jirkovsky (stativ))

On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 03:46:48PM +0200, Adam Maram via aur-general wrote: > I can't leave this mailing list, I'm putting my address on the website, and > I don't receive confirmation of resignation emails :( Please contact the respective -owner address of the list with such issues. In this

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Retiring as a Trusted User

Not sure why this wasn't signed, but this mail should be. On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:10:59AM +0200, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote: > Hi, > > I no longer have the time necessary to properly handle actual TU duties > so I am retiring my TU hat. I will still continue maintaining some >

[aur-general] Retiring as a Trusted User

Hi, I no longer have the time necessary to properly handle actual TU duties so I am retiring my TU hat. I will still continue maintaining some packages I have in [community] via my developer hat. That said, I'd like to orphan some of them too. If anyone is interested in taking over one of these

Re: [aur-general] AUR rate limiting

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 04:41:28PM +0800, hagar wrote: > Is there anything wrong with creating a pertner file to the packages file > that has the pkgname, provides, description and git address in it. Not sure what 'pertner' is supposed to mean, but I'd say sure, we could offer a database dump.

Re: [aur-general] AUR rate limiting

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:02:31PM +0200, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > That should probably be fixed as well, but I agree with making the rate > limit window 1 hour, at most. A 24 hour API restriction on the AUR API is > really nasty imo. So is running cower -u in conky every 5 seconds and not

Re: [aur-general] AUR package metadata dump

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:35:28PM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > - Much less load on the server. > > I've looked through API code and it does an extra SQL query per a > package to get extended data such as dependencies and licenses, which > consists of multiple unions and joins

Re: [aur-general] AUR package metadata dump

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 09:25:02PM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > The way Repology currently fetches AUR package data is as follows: > - fetch https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.gz > - split packages into 100 item packs > - fetch JSON data for packages in each pack from >

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

On Sun 22.07.18 - 15:35, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote: > - Orphaned packages (I'm a regular user of these): > - netctl (?! currently on core, so I suspect I can't maintain this > one) netctl is maintained by Jouke who maintains the netctl code. We only build and push

Re: [aur-general] Build packages without Arch on pkgbuild.com

On 08.04.2018 05:01, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > If you're really afraid of someone running as either your user, or some > user with the power to hijack your SSH session, while you're trying to > sign something, then they could just switch out your built files anyway. > There's literally

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 07.03.2018 23:29, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: >> Please tell them to email complai...@archlinux.org > > You are mistaken. The mail has been deprecated in favor of > /dev/n...@archlinux.org That has been moved to devn...@archlinux.org because that's easier to write on a phone.

Re: [aur-general] Qutebrowser update

On 02.03.2018 12:26, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > How are soyuz and pkgbuild.com related? My login (ambrevar) is not > listed on the latter, but I can connect to the former. They are the same. You are probably looking at the website, but that only lists people that have a ~/public_html directory,

Re: [aur-general] Qutebrowser update

On 02.03.2018 12:19, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > Florian can probably set you up if you don't already have access to it > (pkgbuild.com). soyuz is configured just like orion so you should be able to log in with the same user/key. If it doesn't work drop me a private mail. > But yes, that wiki page

Re: [aur-general] Special Removal of an Inactive TU: faidoc

On 09.01.2018 14:07, Balló György via aur-general wrote: > 1. His last commit in the [community] repository: 2017-01-08 > 2. He doesn't maintain any packages in AUR. > 3. His last message to aur-general mailing list: 2016-03-05 > 4. Most of his packages were adopted by eschwartz. The last time he

Re: [aur-general] Special Removal of an Inactive TU: speps

On 09.01.2018 14:06, Balló György via aur-general wrote: > 1. His last commit in the [community] repository: 2017-01-03 > 2. He doesn't maintain any packages in AUR. > 3. His last message to aur-general mailing list: 2014-03-02 > 4. Most of his packages were adopted by dvzrv. The last time he

Re: [aur-general] Change of Password

On 06.12.2017 02:41, Brett M. Gilio wrote: > My aur account, bmgxc9, had a change of password probably three weeks > ago that I seemed to have misplaced. The email box that it was > registered under, cont...@brettgilio.com is defunct and inaccessible at > the moment. Replied off-list. Florian

Re: [aur-general] TU's invalid key on repos.archlinux.org

On 31.10.2017 07:51, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general wrote: > Err... Who is anybody? TUs cannot update Orion, or can they? No, they can't, only some devs can. Here's a list of people with root access[1]. I've refreshed the keys. If you still have problems feel free to ping me. [1]

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Morten Linderud

On 05.09.2017 14:07, Morten Linderud wrote: > signoff[2] is a tool I have written that helps testers with signing off on > packages they have installed from testing. It comes with neat auto-completions > and enough commands that it should replace the signoff page. Several testers > are > using

Re: [aur-general] Couldn't reset AUR password

On 08.07.2017 11:23, Vitaliy Berdinskikh via aur-general wrote: > Login: ur6lad > E-mail: @gmail.com (or maybe @archlinux.org.ua but > archlinux.org.ua now is down) I see multiple emails being successfully delivered to gmail. Please check your spam folder. Florian signature.asc Description:

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Thore Bödecker

On 15.05.2017 14:04, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote: > The discussion period is now over. You can vote here: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=92 Yes: 30 No: 3 Abstain: 9 Voted: 91.30% Result: Accepted Congrats and welcome to the team! Florian signature.asc Description

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Thore Bödecker

On 10.05.2017 13:51, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote: > On 10.05.2017 13:49, Thore Boedecker via aur-general wrote: >> My name is Thore Bödecker (a.k.a. foxxx0, or just foxxx depending on >> nick availability) and finally I have taken the time increase my >> involvement wi

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Thore Bödecker

On 10.05.2017 13:49, Thore Boedecker via aur-general wrote: > My name is Thore Bödecker (a.k.a. foxxx0, or just foxxx depending on > nick availability) and finally I have taken the time increase my > involvement with Arch Linux. I'm 26 years old now and living in small > town called Falkensee,

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Christian Rebischke

On 22.02.2017 15:53, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote: > You can cast your vote here: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=91 Yes: 37 No: 1 Abstain: 0 Voted: 84.44% Result: Accepted Congratulations Christian and welcome to the TU team :) Florian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digi

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Christian Rebischke

On 17.02.2017 15:26, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote: > On 17.02.2017 15:25, Christian Rebischke wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> I am Christian Rebischke (in the internet mostly known as 'shibumi') and >> I would like to increase my work in the Arch Linux Community and be

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Christian Rebischke

On 17.02.2017 15:25, Christian Rebischke wrote: > Hello everyone, > I am Christian Rebischke (in the internet mostly known as 'shibumi') and > I would like to increase my work in the Arch Linux Community and become > Arch Linux TU. Thanks to Florian Pritz (bluewind) for being my sponsor. I

Re: [aur-general] Stepping down as a TU

On 27.01.2017 12:48, Михаил Страшун wrote: > For a while I have been maintaining packages related to D programming > language, motivated by being involved with the upstream. As the latter > has come to its end I feel it be would appropriate to revoke my TU > access too - I don't think I will have

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User Application: Giancarlo Razzolini

On 21.10.2016 14:19, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote: > Em outubro 21, 2016 10:10 Levente Polyak escreveu: >> >> Well I don't see why it shouldn't be but as long as it's the AUR most likely >> that won't be enforce anyway as there isn't even proper UID GID registry. >> > I don't plan

Re: [aur-general] Typo in email

On Thursday, August 11, 2016 5:45:18 PM CEST Kwang Moo Yi via aur-general wrote: > I hope this is the correct place to ask for help. I made a typo in my > account's e-mail I've corrected this since this request looks legit. The account has only been registered today and the typo was in the

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

On 23.07.2016 20:58, keenerd via aur-general wrote: > On 7/23/16, Nicola Squartini via aur-general > wrote: >> in fact, back in May I posted a patch for namcap >> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2016-May/004346.html > > Sorry I missed that one.

Re: [aur-general] Perl-Moose dependency failure.

On 10.06.2016 21:59, John D Jones III via aur-general wrote: > On 06/10/16 13:45, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote: >> On 10.06.2016 21:08, John D Jones III via aur-general wrote: >> Any reason you don't just call it perl-list-utils? That way it could be >> used to alway

Re: [aur-general] Perl-Moose dependency failure.

On 10.06.2016 21:08, John D Jones III via aur-general wrote: > I propose a temporary buttwag by > just creating a perl-list-utils145 PKGBUILD, Any reason you don't just call it perl-list-utils? That way it could be used to always get the most recent version of that distribution and not just