Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR migration

2020-07-28 Thread Gaetan Bisson via aur-general
[2020-07-28 13:46:23 +0100] Filipe Laíns: > If one machine gets compromised the keys are also compromised. I never suggested to use the same keys for multiple servers. Only that if luna's main purpose is to provide a service and this service is moved to a different host, it makes sense to move

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR migration

2020-07-28 Thread Gaetan Bisson via aur-general
[2020-07-27 21:10:23 -0300] Giancarlo Razzolini: > Em julho 27, 2020 21:03 Gaetan Bisson escreveu: > > > > It's quite unsettling that we seem to be rushing to write a news post > > while this very reasonable suggestion remains completely ignored. > > > >

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR migration

2020-07-27 Thread Gaetan Bisson via aur-general
[2020-07-25 00:18:55 +0200] Baptiste Jonglez: > On 24-07-20, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-dev-public wrote: > > The migration is almost done. Since we are moving to a new machine, it will > > have new host keys. They are: > > > >Ed25519: SHA256:RFzBCUItH9LZS0cKB5UE6ceAYhBD5C8GeOBip8Z11+4 > >

Re: [aur-general] AUR and unsuported architectures

2012-07-21 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2012-07-21 10:15:55 +0200] SanskritFritz: Is there an official consensus about this question? No. I was asked to include 'arm' to the architecture array in fish-shell-git. I have no problems with that, but want to conform to the general recommendations. I would do it and think you should

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Andrzej Giniewicz (giniu)

2012-06-29 Thread Gaetan Bisson
Hi, [2012-06-29 07:53:57 +0200] Andrzej Giniewicz: I'm interested in [...] typography Is there anything specific in this area you'd like to work on in Arch if you're given the chance? Regardless, your application looks great to me; good luck with it! Cheers. -- Gaetan pgpju9QcmLr52.pgp

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - György Balló

2012-03-01 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2012-03-01 23:35:16 +0100] Heiko Baums: I guess you are kidding, aren't you? Nobody cares what you guess. Just quit posing for an expert on everything already. -- Gaetan

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - György Balló

2012-03-01 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2012-03-02 00:13:33 +0100] Heiko Baums: Are you sure that your attitude is the right one? Yes. And that comes from a dev who should know about packaging standards, policies and packaging quality. Such as quoting variables that may contain whitespace? -- Gaetan

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - György Balló

2012-03-01 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2012-03-02 01:44:02 +0100] Heiko Baums: Not me. Like I said, nobody cares. But you know what you want to say? If you have problems reading between the lines, try growing up. -- Gaetan

Re: [aur-general] GPG Key Signing

2011-12-01 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-12-01 09:08:39 -0600] Thomas Dziedzic: I don't think anyone has actually verified that any of the given names are real names. Well, actually, CAcert (which Dan relies on) is all about verifying people's actual identity, in particular their name and birth date. What's important is that

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Timothy Redaelli

2011-11-29 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-11-28 14:20:13 +0100] Andrea Scarpino: I'm sorry Massimiliano, I just read your application and...well...is pretty much a copy-paste. I know Timothy is really motivated, so I hope that he can explain the whole story. Where I come from, plagiarism is a serious offense. It seems to my

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Timothy Redaelli

2011-11-29 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-11-29 14:12:31 +0200] Hector Martinez-Seara: I'm starting to be sick about this thing of plagiarism. So you see nothing wrong with passing somebody else's sentences (hell, paragraphs even!) as your own? That's disturbing, to say the least. If something has been done fine once why to

Re: [aur-general] how do i remove a aur package

2011-11-28 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-11-28 22:49:16 -0600] Angel Dreams: hi guys how do i remove a package? Disownment requests and removal reuqests go to the aur-general mailing list for TUs and other users to decide upon. From: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_User_Guidelines#Other_requests Cheers. --

[aur-general] ML etiquette and bounces (was: TU Resignation)

2011-11-21 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-11-22 00:24:53 +0100] Karol Blazewicz: Can somebody enlighten me what happened with this ML discussion? A quick look at the headers suggests that somebody messed up their mail server and started bouncing messages back to the list. They have now been blacklisted. I'm not well-versed in

[aur-general] SLiM up for adoption

2011-10-30 Thread Gaetan Bisson
Hi devs, Hi TUs, I am orphaning SLiM (login manager): upstream is dead, patches keep piling up, and I actually stopped using that package a while ago. As far as I know, our current package has only one unfixed bug: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/26579 Anyhow, I will move that package

Re: [aur-general] [broadcom-wl] kernel panic

2011-10-23 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-10-24 01:44:50 -0200] Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti: On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:45:04AM -0200, Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti wrote: Hi, Just a heads up to all users of broadcom-wl: a lot of people (myself

Re: [aur-general] Replacing nexuiz with xonotic

2011-10-21 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-10-21 08:45:46 +0200] Dieter Plaetinck: On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:50:31 +0200 Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote: I'd like to see nexuiz replaced by xonotic in [community]. Problem is that nexuiz is still a fairly popular package despite being dead upstream. xonotic devs

Re: [aur-general] Replacing nexuiz with xonotic

2011-10-21 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-10-21 10:00:37 +0200] Massimiliano Torromeo: If the sizes of the packages are problematic that's a different issue. Okay. Suppose that issue isn't entirely theoretical. How do we solve it? -- Gaetan

Re: [aur-general] Head over Heels (hoh 1.01-5) download problems

2011-09-23 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-09-23 10:54:23 +0200] SanskritFritz: The problem is that makepkg uses wget to download the sources Just a note: curl will be the default in the next release. The previous AUR maintainer of hoh solved this issue simply by hosting the file on his site (which is allowed, settled through

Re: [aur-general] Delete Request

2011-07-26 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-07-27 08:11:52 +0800] Auguste Pop: audacious2 was there It was uploaded today. -- Gaetan

Re: [aur-general] AUR Copyright

2011-02-06 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-02-06 13:22:20 -0700] Thomas S Hatch: Realy I think that this is a simple thing, that we should just post some statement that says that anything uploaded to the AUR can be absorbed into the Arch Linux distribution. This disclaimer should not be limited to Arch, IMHO: sister projects

Re: [aur-general] AUR Copyright

2011-02-06 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-02-06 19:28:38 -0200] Bernardo Barros: 2011/2/6 Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org: By uploading content to the Arch User Repository, you irrevocably agree to release it in the public domain, to the extent permitted by law. GPL would do no harm to Arch either. And pieces of code

Re: [aur-general] deletion request

2010-11-19 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2010-11-19 13:24:09 +] Christopher Brannon: Seblu se...@seblu.net writes: package: dnstracer Reson: Is in community Deleted, thanks. Thanks, that was fast. Could you also delete (same reason): - pari http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19196 - collectd

[aur-general] Various new packages in [community]

2010-11-16 Thread Gaetan Bisson
Dear TUs, I'm Gaetan, a (discreet) junior dev, mentored by Allan. I recently got access to sigurd and thought I would use that opportunity to maintain in [community] a few packages I have been maintaining on the AUR so far, but which are just a bit too unpopular to go to [extra]: pari (fast

[aur-general] delete request ttf-hannom-usong

2010-09-27 Thread Gaetan Bisson
Dear TUs, I uploaded two new fonts with CJK glyph coverage to [extra] yesterday: ttf-baekmuk and ttf-hannom. The former appears to be gone from AUR, so many thanks to the person who took care of removing it. Could you please remove ttf-hannom-usong too?

[aur-general] new packages in [extra]

2010-09-14 Thread Gaetan Bisson
Dear TUs, The following packages have been added to [extra], so their counterparts can safely be removed from the AUR. libcue http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25766 libguesshttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39416 ttf-sazanami