Re: [aur-general] Disown request

2011-02-02 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
Actually I didn't. Then I'll try that as well. On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Christopher Brannon wrote: > H.Gökhan SARI writes: > > > Hello, > > > > Please disown package uget* so that i can adopt and update it. I dropped > a > > comment for maintainer to update package but (s)he doesn't seem

[aur-general] Disown request

2011-02-02 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
Hello, Please disown package uget* so that i can adopt and update it. I dropped a comment for maintainer to update package but (s)he doesn't seem to be responding. uget: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25887 Thanks, -- H.Gökhan SARI h.

[aur-general] Package removal request

2011-01-18 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
Hello, Can you please remove my package 'light-themes-maverick' package ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41743) because there are enough light themes packages :) -- H.Gökhan SARI h...@difuzyon.net

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-01-07 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
Hello, There is package named 'nautilussvn' in AUR ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26289). However, this package is obsolete because project is renamed as rabbitvcs and a newer version is published. Newer package is rabbitvcs-nautilus ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34482).

Re: [aur-general] About BURG packages

2010-11-24 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
Main burg package (which is burg-bzr, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33382) is not orphaned and not updated since July 16, although package is flagged as out-of-date and a better PKGBUILD is suggested in comments. And I think it's nonsense adopting burg-themes (https://aur.archlinux.org/

[aur-general] About BURG packages

2010-11-23 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
Hello, There is a variety of burg-* packages on AUR: burg-bzr burg-bzr-fixed burg-emu-fixed burg-themes burg-themes-extras burg-themes-fixed the packages with *-fixed postfix are the working ones (There is a thread going on https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=100130). And the other p

[aur-general] Package removal request

2010-11-21 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
Hello, Can you please remove package 'pidgin-monocrome-tray-icons'. It's the package pidgin-monochrome-tray-icons with a typo :) -- H.Gökhan SARI h...@difuzyon.net

[aur-general] Removal Request

2010-09-02 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
Hello, Could you please my old package 'ssh-proxify'? There isn't such application anymore. -- H.Gökhan SARI h...@difuzyon.net

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2010-02-07 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
OMG, I'm impressed. I've just pushed the send button! Thanks a lot! On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) < ghost1...@archlinux.us> wrote: > On 02/07/2010 11:15 PM, H.Gökhan SARI wrote: > >> Hello, >> I've been maintaining blogpost* package but developer prefers working

[aur-general] Removal Request

2010-02-07 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
Hello, I've been maintaining blogpost* package but developer prefers working on a mercurial repository rather than publishing clear version updates. And there is already a package 'blogpost-hg*' in AUR, so please delete my package blogpost. * blogpost => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18

[aur-general] zim-nightly package in AUR

2010-02-06 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
Hello, There is a package called zim in [extra]. I've been using it, but today i realised that zim is rewritten with python rather than perl. Then I removed old version and switched to pyzim in AUR (Because package in [extra] is not updated for a while). However, there is a package called zim-night

[aur-general] perl vs libperl

2010-01-17 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
Hello everyone, There is a package 'libperl' in AUR[1]. I think this package is already provided in perl from [core]. In addition to this, it looks like AUR package is not maintained anymore. Shouldn't it be removed? [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26653 -- H.Gökhan SARI h...@difuz

[aur-general] Package Removal Request

2009-12-10 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
Hi, There was a 'chrome-like-icons' on gnome and i have made a package of it, but looks like it doesn't exist anymore. So, can you please remove it? chrome-like-icons http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29475 -- H.Gökhan SARI h...@difuzyon.net

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2009-06-17 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
Hello, I have packages gtk-imajdotat[0], imaj.at[1], imaj.at terminal[2] are obsolete now because imaj.at -image uploading website- is not available anymore. Can you please delete these packages? [0]:http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19610 [1]

[aur-general] Delete package gtk-engine-glory

2009-06-16 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
Can you please delete the package gtk-engine-glory on AUR? I accidentally uploaded it as a gtk engine, however it's a theme only. -- H.Gökhan SARI h...@difuzyon.net