Re: [aur-general] On TU application, TU participation and community/ package quality

On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:10 PM Sébastien Luttringer via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 13:29 -0500, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general > wrote: > > ## Issues > > * Existing Trusted Users are not followed closely in their actions, and > the > > quality

Re: [aur-general] [RFC] Draft of the AUR 4.0.0 migration notification

Just use git add -A to add everything. On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:05 PM, John D Jones III wrote: > On 5/26/15 11:09 AM, SpinFlo wrote: > >> >> this don't work for me >> >> i need first: >> >> git add .SRCINFO >> git add .gitignore (if use) >> >> and then 'git add * && git -am "initial commit"'

Re: [aur-general] Merge request [Jul 13]

On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Limao Luo wrote: > Can you please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/** > packages/bin32-acroread-chs/into > https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/acroread-chs/?

Re: [aur-general] firehol and me-tv disowned

On 03/06/2013 11:27 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: > I've disowned the firehol and me-tv packages in [community]. If nobody > adopts them within a week or so, they will be moved to the AUR. > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/firehol/ > https://www.archlinux.or

Re: [aur-general] Unexpected aur package removal.

On 03/14/2013 04:01 AM, Daniel Wallace wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:05:04AM +, Xyne wrote: >> Ionut Biru wrote: >> >>> mate, you did something wrong, stop trying to find out excuses >>> for your actions. >>> >>> please do not delete builds like that anymore, leave comments >>> about an

Re: [aur-general] firehol and me-tv disowned

On 03/06/2013 11:32 PM, SanskritFritz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: >> I've disowned the firehol > > This is sad news. May I know the reason? Of course when you drop it to > the AUR I will immediately pick it up then. I haven't u

[aur-general] firehol and me-tv disowned

I've disowned the firehol and me-tv packages in [community]. If nobody adopts them within a week or so, they will be moved to the AUR. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/firehol/ https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/me-tv/ https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i

Re: [aur-general] Removal and rename requests

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/30/2012 11:02 AM, Thomas Jost wrote: > > I've uploaded them. So could you please merge: - > python-feedformatter > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32382) --> > python2-feedformatter > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59625)

Re: [aur-general] Removal and rename requests

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/30/2012 10:30 AM, Thomas Jost wrote: > Hello, > > Could a TU please remove the following AUR packages: - > libopenspotify-git: abandoned upstream 2 years ago, doesn't work > anymore. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33913 - > netcfg-op

[aur-general] ranger 1.5.4-1 could require --force

Hi all, the newest ranger update contains .pyo files. These were not contained in previous packages and could have been created by running ranger as root. If pacman complains about conflicts, it is safe to --force this update: pacman -S --force ranger

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning desmume/agg

On 04/15/2012 05:34 PM, Jonathan Conder wrote: > Hi all, > > I have just orphaned desmume & agg, since I don't really have time to > maintain packages that I don't use. Unless someone adopts it I'll move > desmume to the AUR next week (it needs updating). However, I can't do > that with agg as it

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Fwd: willing to adopt avr-* packages in community

On 03/12/2012 09:20 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Kaspar Bumke > ... > Could you forward to arch-dev-public at your discretion please? [community] matters are usually discussed on aur-general. > I saw that that the avr-gcc and avr-binutils packages ar

Re: [aur-general] orphan request: dma

On 01/23/2012 09:19 PM, Giorgio Lando wrote: > Could someone orphan the following in unsupported: > > dma http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17039 > > The maintainer is not responsive to comments, updates it only randomly > and did not reply in a week to an email concerning dma. Moreover,

Re: [aur-general] Merge and removal request

On 01/17/2012 09:11 PM, Hyacinthe Cartiaux wrote: > Hello, > > oxygen-gtk package has been renamed oxygen-gtk2 (in order to avoid > confusion with oxygen-gtk3). > In the same way, I have created a new package lib32-oxygen-gtk2. > Now, I would like to merge votes and comments with the old package >

Re: [aur-general] removal request - monitorix-tmpfs

On 12/18/2011 01:19 PM, member graysky wrote: > Please delete this entry: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34134 > > I have uploaded its successor called, monitorix-sync-daemon. Having both > is just confusing. > > Thx! Done, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Developer/TU key signing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/25/2011 02:27 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: > Hi, > > my arch master key is available [1] with fingerprint 44D4 A033 AC14 > 0143 9273 97D4 7EFD 567D 4C7E A887. > > Every packager please do: > > 1) reply this email in the mailing list, include gerolde

Re: [aur-general] Request: Merge libpurple-kwallet-plugin with libpurple-kwallet

On 11/21/2011 12:11 AM, Zom Aur wrote: > Hello, > > I've recently created the libpurple-kwallet package and adopted > libpurple-kwallet-plugin. Looking at the other libpurple-plugins on AUR, I > think libpurple-kwallet should be the desired name to match the other > plugins. > > Could someone eit

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: boo

On 11/21/2011 12:18 AM, Tasos Latsas wrote: > Hello, > > boo already in extra > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25365 > Done

Re: [aur-general] Removal Requests

On 11/02/2011 10:43 AM, Luca Bennati wrote: > python-decoroute-hg (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31564): > wrong name (python2 only), right package is python2-decoroute-hg, available > at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41956 > python-munkres (https://aur.archlinux.org/package

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request

On 10/28/2011 09:21 PM, Max Roder wrote: > Hi, > > on October 9th, I mailed nofxx [1] and asked wether he still has the > time to update his packages (some of them are out-of-date/404). I would > like to adopt and update some of them. > > As I did not recieve any reaction, I'm asking you to orpha

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 10/15/2011 12:29 PM, foalsrock wrote: > Hello, I'm the maintainer of the following packages which became outdated > with Gnome 3.2 release and have not been updated since. > > gnome-shell-extension-arrow-key-window-selector-git: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50646 > gnome-shell-ex

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 09/23/2011 02:07 PM, Antonis Kouliakiotis wrote: > Please remove nnotes-git [1]. The project has been renamed to 'notably' so I > submitted a new package by that name [2] > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52091 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52534 Done!

Re: [aur-general] prune_bin - deletion request

On Fri 09 Sep 2011 08:25:01 AM CEST, Jozef Riha wrote: > please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24227 from > aur. reasons are mentioned in comments. > > thank you, > > jose (maintainer) Deleted. Since comments are deleted along with the package, it'd be nice if you could also sen

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 09/08/2011 04:58 AM, Cyker Way wrote: > Please remove mpy and mpy-git. Due to name conflicts on PyPI, they have been > renamed as ncmpy and ncmpy-git. Thanks! > mpy and mpy-git seem to already have been removed.

Re: [aur-general] marge request

On 08/31/2011 03:57 PM, A Rojas wrote: > Please merge zanshin-kde ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50984 > ) into zanshin-todo ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52024 ) > which is the upstream name. > Done, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request kernel26-selinux

On 08/16/2011 11:01 PM, Nicky726 wrote: > Hello, TUs, as the maintainer of kernel26-selinux [1] I ask for its removal, > as it has been made obsolete by linux-selinux [2]. May this also serve as a > notice to the users who do not subscribe to package comments. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/pac

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request: musca-fixed

On 08/14/2011 04:05 PM, nem wrote: > good day. > > please remove musca-fixed [1], which i added when musca [2] still was in > [community]. i merged my bugpatches into the musca PKGBUILD making > musca-fixed redundant. sorry for the hazzle. > > regards, > nem > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/package

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for kernel26-fbcondecor

On 08/08/2011 11:22 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: > Hi TUs, > > you can remove my package kernel26-fbcondecor > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15603) from AUR. > > I have renamed it to linux-fbcondecor > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50924) and upgraded it to > 3.0.1. > > Heiko Done

Re: [aur-general] Request for deletion of nvidia-fbcondecor3 package

On 08/08/2011 10:46 PM, Wu Ying Ren wrote: > Hi! > > I'm wuyingren, current maintainer of nvidia-fbcondecor aur package. Today, > I uploaded a package named nvidia-fbcondecor3 because I thought cyberpatrol > was going to maintain two packages for kernel-fbcondecor (one for 2.6 and > another for 3

Re: [aur-general] removal of soya

On 08/05/2011 02:05 PM, Martti Kühne wrote: please remove package soya [1], I moved it to the correctly named python-soya [2] mar77i [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10102 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43850 Done, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request

On 08/04/2011 12:55 AM, minimalist wrote: Please orphan perl-email-sender. It hasn't been updated and the maintainer does not respond to email. Thanks. Done, please include a link next time.

[aur-general] Inactive July 19 - 27

I will be hiking in Iceland from today until July 27th, feel free to update my packages if needed. See you guys in a bit!

Re: [aur-general] Delete: mod_bw and mod_macro

On 06/30/2011 02:15 PM, Phillip Smith wrote: Could someone please delete "mod_bw" and "mod_macro" as I have renamed them to have the "apache-" prefix. Thx, ~p Done, next time please provide links.

Re: [aur-general] [AUR] Orphan all old packages flagged as out-of-date

On 06/07/2011 12:14 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: Hi TUs, I'd like to orphan all packages in AUR flagged as out-of-date before February 2011 (for example, I think 3 months are enough). What do you think about? Maybe Loui/Lukas can provide a list? Maintainers will not get a notification about that

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request for burg packages

On 06/07/2011 06:35 PM, fsck daemon wrote: The maintainer of the burg collection of packages, cruznick, has been MIA for two months. He has not responded to comments in AUR or the BBS. I sent him an email one month ago to the email listed on AUR (same as on BBS) with no reply. The package burg-

Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change package names

On 06/01/2011 05:26 PM, D. Can Celasun wrote: Actually, it is still possible. Here's how it'd work: - TU changes package name from foo to bar. - This automatically triggers an out-of-date notification (and an explanation comment) for all packages that depend on foo. - Everyone updates their pac

Re: [aur-general] Orphans [extra] repository cleanup

On 05/13/2011 06:18 PM, Xyne wrote: Andrea Scarpino wrote: # These will be moved to [community] abcde aria2 numlockx I'll take those once their in [community] Regards, Xyne Ninja! Check the wiki: # abcde - (schuay) # aria2 - I have used this occasionally in the past for torrents, so I wou

Re: [aur-general] Renaming some python packages

On 04/28/2011 10:24 AM, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: I've renamed a few python packages I maintain: could somebody please delete the old versions? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38831 dumb-bookmarks (renamed to python2-dumb, since it is mostly a module) http://aur.archlinux.org/pac

Re: [aur-general] Please delete gtkmm3 and gtk3-engines

On 04/28/2011 08:01 AM, Rémy Oudompheng wrote: Hello, These packages were created before Gnome 3 arrived in [gnome-unstable] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41016 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41024 Rémy. Done!

Re: [aur-general] Adopting the paccheck package

On 03/27/2011 04:13 PM, Bernard Baeyens wrote: IgnorantGuru doesn't intend to continue maintaining the paccheck package, which is now broken after the pacman 3.5.1 upgrade. I wrote an updated version which can be used with the new pacman release. I agree to become the new maintainer of that p

Re: [aur-general] Package marked as outdated

On 03/19/2011 01:23 AM, JD Steffen wrote: Hello, I do not know if this is the right place to post this. I maintain the eduke32 package in the AUR, and it was recently marked as out of date. This is incorrect as the most current "stable" non-development tarball is from July of 2010. I noted as

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On 03/19/2011 12:38 AM, Dan Vratil wrote: And one more package to delete please (although not mine this time) wt-c++ [1] is a duplicate of wt [2]. Thanks [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42244 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18049 Done.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On 03/19/2011 12:28 AM, Dan Vratil wrote: Hi, please delete my package akonadi-facebook-git [1], I didn't notice that there's already kfacebook-git [2] in AUR. Thanks! [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47550 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46980 Done, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Cleanup request

On 02/14/2011 07:31 PM, Lou wrote: On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:07:07 +0200 "D. Can Celasun" wrote: I've been going through Firefox stuff on AUR and noticed there are a lot of ancient/obsolete/orphaned/etc. packages. I think the following should be deleted, just to keep AUR clean. Adding names for

Re: [aur-general] Please delete gimp-save-for-web

On 02/10/2011 04:07 PM, Marcel Korpel wrote: Hi, Can someone please delete gimp-save-for-web [1], as it is a duplicate of gimp-plugin-saveforweb [2] (though it has a nice package ID ;). Thanks! Regards, Marcel [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/pac

Re: [aur-general] poppler rebuilds will soon move - one buggy pkg in Community

On 02/05/2011 10:32 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote: On 02/05/2011 10:08 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: So far I only know of one broken pkg in community where a fix is available: epdfview - https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22734. That fix you mentioned is already applied in the current package. I tried a

Re: [aur-general] poppler rebuilds will soon move - one buggy pkg in Community

On 02/05/2011 10:08 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: So far I only know of one broken pkg in community where a fix is available: epdfview - https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22734. That fix you mentioned is already applied in the current package. I tried a couple of different patches a few days ago. The

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

On 01/19/2011 05:17 AM, H.Gökhan SARI wrote: Hello, Can you please remove my package 'light-themes-maverick' package ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41743) because there are enough light themes packages :) Done, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Anybody want apvlv?

On 01/11/2011 08:17 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: On 11 January 2011 05:10, Brad Fanella wrote: On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: On 9 January 2011 03:27, Brad Fanella wrote: So with the recent release of apvlv 0.1.0, I have decided to drop maintaining it. I believe it now suppor

Re: [aur-general] please delete pygit2-git

On 01/07/2011 10:34 AM, Hervé Cauwelier wrote: Hi, I long hesitated between naming my package "pygit2-git" (to follow the upstream name) and python-libgit2-git (to follow the Python naming scheme). I chose the latter and added "pygit2" in the description so people still find it. Please de

Re: [aur-general] deleted revengeofthetitans-hib

On 12/24/2010 09:25 AM, widomaker...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Please delete "revengeofthetitans-hib", it's of duplicite which http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37457 to remove : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44694 thanks. Done, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Moving calibre and unetbootin to [community]

On 12/13/2010 01:00 PM, Giovanni Scafora wrote: Hi guys, I'd like to move calibre [1] and unetbootin [2] to [community] repo. As you see, respectively they have 435 and 1401 votes. What do you think about? Opinions? [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20406 [2] http://aur.archlinux.or

Re: [aur-general] Remove request

On 12/04/2010 01:07 PM, jesse jaara wrote: Please remove: openoffice.org-voikko http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29139 A new pkg called voikko-openoffice was created to that the name would be similar to voikko-libreoffice suomi-malaga http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29138 A ne

Re: [aur-general] delete package

On 11/30/2010 05:50 PM, Joao Cordeiro wrote: gnome-globalmenu-svn [1] Now using git [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21152 Done.

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

On 11/27/2010 02:30 PM, 翁学天 wrote: > Yes, and please delete fcitx-config-hg too. > > I'm not sure about what to do about fcitx4vim, but actually the patch > introduced in that package has been merge to the upstream. If it doesn't > matter fcitx4vim can be deleted as well. > > And I'll contact the m

Re: [aur-general] delete request

On 11/30/2010 04:59 PM, Gonzalo Seguel wrote: please delete this package gtkhtml-editor: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42648 the content of this package now is part of gtkhtml package, and not be useful anymore thanks Done!

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

On 11/27/2010 12:36 PM, 翁学天 wrote: Please delete following package: fcitx-config: renamed to fcitx-configtool by upstream fcitx-config-git: upstream nolonger use git but hg fcitx-dbus-svn: upstream nolonger use svn but hg fcitx-sunpinyin-git: upstream nolonger use git but hg fcitx-svn: upstream n

Re: [aur-general] Disown b43-tools-git.

On 11/21/2010 12:00 PM, Konstantinos Karantias wrote: b43-tools-git has various problems right now, and it hasn't been updated for almost a year, can someone disown it? Done.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request (thunar-volman-git-udev)

On 11/19/2010 12:03 PM, Skyalmian Alcyone wrote: "...anyway this package is not necessary anymore since the code is merged into thunar volman standard git repository..." - Berseker, August 06, 2010 The maintainer, killermoehre, dropped it on July 31, 2010 and this package is superseded by thuna

Re: [aur-general] Who wants a cloak on IRC?

On 11/12/10 02:45, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Jan Steffens wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Alper KANAT wrote: Is there a cloak for community members? (I'm co-founder of Turkish community) I'm sorry, we only give cloaks to Arch Linux developers and TUs.

Re: [aur-general] Cleaning up aqpm / shaman packages

On 10/26/2010 10:02 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40830 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40831 [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15422 [4] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29028 [5] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID

[aur-general] Cleaning up aqpm / shaman packages

I'd like to remove a few old and broken aqpm / shaman packages. AFAIK, the only working packages in the AUR are aqpm-git[1] and shaman-svn[2] Candidates for removal (depend on an old version of libalpm and don't build anymore): shaman [3] shaman1-git [4] aqpm [5] libaqpm-git [6] Additional

Re: [aur-general] deletion request: nickle

On 10/26/2010 09:51 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: Please delete the package 'nickle'. It was pushed to extra less than 24 hours after I posted my package. In related news, beware of JGC: he's magical. d Done thanks

Re: [aur-general] New Trusted User: Lukas Fleischer

On 10/24/2010 05:53 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: On Sunday 24 October 2010 at 15:04 Loui Chang wrote: With 21 yes, 0 no, and 4 abstains out of 27 active members, we have a 92.5% quorum and a new Trusted User! Wooo! Congratulations Lukas! My condolences Lukas :D

Re: [aur-general] Please Remove: geography-countries, ip-country

On 10/24/2010 05:31 PM, Justin Davis wrote: These package do not follow the perl module naming guidelines for the AUR. They are also duplicates of existing packages perl-geography-countries and perl-ip-country. The maintainer has agreed they should be removed. * ip-country (http://aur.archlinux.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: ruby-ocra

On 10/19/2010 06:55 PM, Emiliano Vavassori wrote: Hi all, please delete ruby-ocra: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41934 Was uploaded by me by mistake since it is not working on Unix systems. Thanks, regards, Done, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: pygraphviz (renamed)

On 10/19/2010 11:50 AM, Clément Démoulins wrote: Hi, Could you please delete my package pygraphviz(1). I rename the package to python-pygraphviz(2) to follow python guidelines. Thanks, Clément Démoulins (1) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16068 (2) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: bibletime-kde4 bibletime-i18n

On 10/18/2010 08:54 PM, Christoph wrote: Please remove the following packages: bibletime-kde4 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21617 bibletime-i18n http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15503 bibletime-kde4 is not necessary any longer because the maintainer has adopted and updated bi

Re: [aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup (Discussion Period)

On 10/18/2010 04:10 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: Am 10.10.2010 13:46, schrieb Jakob Gruber: On 10/04/2010 11:18 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote: In response to Louis objections about skipping the discussion period, I'm posting the full text of the proposal below. It has been altered fro

Re: [aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup (Discussion Period)

On 10/04/2010 11:18 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote: In response to Louis objections about skipping the discussion period, I'm posting the full text of the proposal below. It has been altered from the original text to incorporate Xynes idea of adding the 'last maintainer activity rule.

Re: [aur-general] Please orphan haskell-convertible-text

On 10/08/2010 03:15 AM, Loui Chang wrote: On Thu 07 Oct 2010 20:40 +0200, Xyne wrote: Peter Simons wrote: the package has been out-of-date for a while, and the maintainers respond neither to e-mail nor to messages left on AUR. Could you please o

Re: [aur-general] Fixing stuff in [community] repos

On 10/04/2010 03:27 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: On 4 October 2010 19:52, Allan McRae wrote: - gammu Funny, if the problem was a skipped db-update, I should've noticed this. The logs looked like they were made using devtools, so I didn't bother validating them after I came back from inactivity. Th

Re: [aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup (Discussion Period)

On 10/04/2010 03:07 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: Can I just clarify - "package action" only includes submission or resubmission / modification, right? I.e. adding comments, flagging out-of-date etc are not considered "package actions"? Thanks, Pete. That's correct, both package and maintainer acti

[aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup (Discussion Period)

In response to Louis objections about skipping the discussion period, I'm posting the full text of the proposal below. It has been altered from the original text to incorporate Xynes idea of adding the 'last maintainer activity rule. Sorry for making you guys vote twice. This marks the beginn

Re: [aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup

On 10/03/2010 08:57 PM, Xyne wrote: I've cast a "yes" vote. I also move to name this "Operation Oliver Twist" and to name the orphaning script "twister". One problem that might arise though is if a stable package (i.e. one that almost never gets updated upstream) has been recently flagged out-o

[aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup

Hi TUs, I've just created a new proposal concerning the orphaning of all packages marked 'out of date' which have not been updated (or submitted) since before January 1st, 2009. For details, see the actual proposal text. The voting period ends on October 10th, please cast your votes! schuay

Re: [aur-general] move openlh-{client,core,server} to AUR

On 09/28/2010 08:54 AM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: Can I move these orphans packages with less then 1% of votes (pkgstats) from [community] to AUR? openlh-client openlh-core openlh-server Dead sources, +1

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

On 09/27/2010 09:40 PM, Luca Bennati wrote: Hi all angband-svn http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33018 epiar-cvs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20735 switched since some time to git opensnc http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40910 is a duplicate of opensonic http://aur.a

Re: [aur-general] AUR - 'kernel26' search results

On 09/22/2010 09:31 PM, PyroPeter wrote: On 09/22/2010 07:13 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: Orphaned all except the following, thanks. kpdf2: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12299 (though, maybe not?) network-manager-applet-notify-osd: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34282

Re: [aur-general] AUR - 'kernel26' search results

On 09/22/2010 07:13 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: Orphaned all except the following, thanks. kpdf2: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12299 (though, maybe not?) network-manager-applet-notify-osd: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34282 nvidia-173xx-ice: http://aur.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] AUR - 'kernel26' search results

Orphaned all except the following, thanks. kpdf2: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12299 (though, maybe not?) network-manager-applet-notify-osd: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34282 nvidia-173xx-ice: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21059 otrtool-git: http://aur.arch

Re: [aur-general] AUR cleanup (was: Removal request (aurdupes output 2010-09-15))

Here are some initial results from a recent dump of the DB: -- 1) packages which are marked 'out of date' but the last action date [1] is < 2009 http://pastebin.com/GVPYcvLC 2) maintainers with last action date across all owned packages < 2009 http://pastebin.com/9ja2f

Re: [aur-general] everyone welcome our newest TU: Peter Lewis!

On 09/22/2010 12:58 AM, Jan Steffens wrote: On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: Woo hoo! Thanks everyone! Welcome! :-) Welcome Peter!

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] The "Great Python Rebuild of 2010" begins

Of the 235 packages in [community-staging], > > 195 were rebuilt by Jakob Gruber. > > > > -- Chris > > Yes I just pm'ed him giving a thankful note. > > Now I am fighting with scipy, any hint is always good :D. Thanks Jakob! we > owe you "n" b

Re: [aur-general] Package removal from [community]

On Sunday 19 September 2010 15:17:12 Rémy Oudompheng wrote: > Jakob Gruber wrote: > > Maybe somebody could take a look at fixing > > canorus/libdesktop-agnostic/python- scipy builds. > > The problem with scipy is with C/C++ headers, see > http://projects.scipy.org/s

[aur-general] Package removal from [community]

Hi, while going through the python rebuild, I came across a few packages which could be removal candidates: Dead sources: driconf openlh-client openlh-core openlh-server python-geotypes (could be temporary, see http://initd.org/) python-psycopg1 (could be temporary, see http://initd.org/) subdl

Re: [aur-general] Removal request (aurdupes output 2010-09-15)

On Sunday 19 September 2010 04:31:53 Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:22:52PM -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote: > > It's definitely got some margin for error. What does the dupes script > > check? pkgname? > > Yep, it checks for duplicate package names in the official repos and the >

Re: [aur-general] pastebinit: packager MIA

On Sunday 12 September 2010 19:23:58 jwbirdsong wrote: > On 09/12/2010 11:06 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote: > > On Sunday 12 September 2010 18:31:00 François Boulogne wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> The following package > >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.

Re: [aur-general] pastebinit: packager MIA

On Sunday 12 September 2010 18:31:00 François Boulogne wrote: > Hello, > > The following package > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14710 > for pastebinit is no longer maintained. I sent an email to the PKGBUILD > author, he didn't reply me; so I guess he is MIA. > > I can maintain this

Re: [aur-general] pastebinit: packager MIA

On Sunday 12 September 2010 18:31:00 François Boulogne wrote: > Hello, > > The following package > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14710 > for pastebinit is no longer maintained. I sent an email to the PKGBUILD > author, he didn't reply me; so I guess he is MIA. > > I can maintain this

Re: [aur-general] mail-notification

On Thursday 09 September 2010 07:53:08 Nathan O wrote: > gnome-mail-notification http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32363 > seems to be the same as mail-notification > http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/mail-notification/trunk/ the only > difference I noticed is that it doesn't have pat

Re: [aur-general] Welcome our newest TU, Jakob Gruber (schuay)

On Monday 06 September 2010 19:01:04 Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: > On 6 September 2010 18:57, Laurent Carlier wrote: > > Le lundi 06 septembre 2010 18:55:06, vous avez écrit : > >> Here are the results: > >> > >> Yes: 11 (+1 from stefan) > >> No: 1 > >> Abstain: 9 (-1 from stefan) > >> > >> -> 21 vot

Re: [aur-general] TU Application / Looking for sponsor

On Wednesday 25 August 2010 17:26:18 Philipp Überbacher wrote: > How about boost-build? It has 93 votes. But luabind is the first thing I > encountered that needs it. I've only adopted boost-build and luabind very recently as they're dependencies of allacrost and were both orphaned. I'm not famil

Re: [aur-general] TU Application / Looking for sponsor

On Wednesday 25 August 2010 15:09:09 Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:30:35 +0200 > > schrieb Jakob Gruber : > > me-tv > > Are you really sure that you want to bring THIS package to [community]? > > I was a former AUR maintainer of this package and o

[aur-general] TU Application / Looking for sponsor

Hi, I'd like to apply for the TU position, and as I don't have a sponsor yet it'd be great if somebody would be kind enough to take me on :) A little bit about myself: I'm 26 and I live close to Vienna, Austria. The past couple of years I've worked as a database developer / consultant, then as

[aur-general] Deletion and disown requests

Hi, please delete stone-soup-nettiles [1]. The project looks dead and was never actually 100% usable as far as I know. I'm not sure about the second one. stone-soup [2] has a maintainer and was last updated on July 27th. However, it's been perpetually out of date, with AUR updates coming 2 mon

[aur-general] Deletion Request

Hi, please delete qt4wvdialer-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29540 (replaced by qt4wvdialer) and tuxpicross http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35212 (replaced by picmi) Thanks, schuay

Re: [aur-general] Rename my AUR package

On Wednesday 12 May 2010 22:04:10 Ionut Biru wrote: > On 05/12/2010 11:01 PM, julroy67 wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I maintain lugaru-hd-opensource ( > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37145 ) and I first used the > > initial source package provided by Wolfire, but now I'm using the a hg > > b

Re: [aur-general] Please disown me-tv

On Friday 02 April 2010 12:43:03 Stefan Husmann wrote: > Am 02.04.2010 12:10, schrieb Jakob Gruber: > > Hi, > > > > me-tv has been outdated since forever with no response from the > > maintainer. It was last updated on July 8 2009. > > > > I wrote to thi

[aur-general] Please disown me-tv

Hi, me-tv has been outdated since forever with no response from the maintainer. It was last updated on July 8 2009. I wrote to this list a few months ago but the message seems to have bounced - in the meantime I created my own up to date package called me-tv-stable. Please disown me-tv so I ca

  1   2   >