Re: [aur-general] Supported Architectures

I dont know what then official stance is, but I have seen and used armv7 packages in the AUR --James On 10/06/2014 02:03 PM, Jameson wrote: > I know that officially Arch only supports i686 and x86_64, but what > about AUR? I occasionally have people request that I add ARM > architectures to my PK

Re: [aur-general] NodeJS build dependencies

My 2 cents would be to continue using npm, though allot of the python library's have been included into the main repo / AUR On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:56 PM, 4javier <4javier...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm the maintainer of "brackets" package on AUR. It's a code editor written > in javascript upon Nod

Re: [aur-general] Package python2-sqlalchemy-0.7.9 rename request

Would creating the package python-sqlalchemy-0.7.9 and then merging python2-sqlalchemy-0.7.9 into it not be better? On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Willem wrote: > Please rename https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-sqlalchemy-0.7.9/ > to python-sqlalchemy-0.7.9, so I can submit a python-s

Re: [aur-general] Notify by e-mail when PKGBUILD updated by maintainer?

ike the best way of fulfilling the > original request. Though perhaps a new option to "subscribe to > update notifications" would be preferable to sending them to people > who just want to be informed when a package is removed/merged. > > Cheers, > > > WorMzy >

Re: [aur-general] Notify by e-mail when PKGBUILD updated by maintainer?

clean. >> >> Regards, >> >> Amish > > As both a maintainer and user of quite a few AUR packages: I'll > get annoyed and unsubscribe from notifications for all the packages > I use which do this, and I'll certainly not do it myself. > > There *are*

[aur-general] Delete package

Hi all, could https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-keystoneclient-deb/ be removed as I have moved all of its dependants to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-keystoneclient/ thanks James

[aur-general] Orphan

Could you please orphan https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-keystoneclient/ I have emailed the user with no reply, thanks

[aur-general] Orphan

Could you please orphan https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pbr/ as I have flagged the package as out of date, and emailed the user with no responce thanks

[aur-general] Removal of package

As requested a few days ago, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-cinderclient-deb/ needs removing as we have moved to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-cinderclient/ Thanks! -- James

[aur-general] Openstack discussion

Hi all, Openstack is a collection of projects aimed at providing a opensource solution to cloud infrastructure deployment and management, It's similar to products such as Proxmox, Virt-manager and Vmware. The projects that contribute to Openstack are tightly linked through a set of API's, and lik

[aur-general] Remove packages

Sorry, last removal request of the day Could you remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient-deb/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-glanceclient-deb/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-novaclient-deb/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-swiftclient-d

[aur-general] Removal request

Could https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient-deb/ be removed as I have moved all of the dependency's to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient/ Thanks

[aur-general] Remove package

Could https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-neutronclient-deb/ be removed as I have moved all of the dependency's to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-neutronclient/ Thanks -- James

[aur-general] Removal request

I propose that https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf-deb/ should be deleted as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf/ replaces it and that https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oslo-messaging-deb/ should be deleted as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-o

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request

Good points. with regards to the email, I didn't know it was possible to access a user accounts password. Learned something new there thanks for orphaning the package :) regards -- James On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Xyne wrote: > James Bulmer wrote: > > >Could you

[aur-general] Orphan request

Hi. Could you kindly orphan the package nanomsg, its two versions out of date, when I attempted to contact the owner, I received a dns error due to his domain no longer existing For the same reason could nanomsg-git be removed, I can't see a need for most people running a "bleeding edge" version

[aur-general] Orphan request

Could you please orphan python2-webob, the package has not been updated in 2 years and is dependency to Openstack Thanks -- James

[aur-general] Packages removal

Could you please remove the packages python2-sqlalchemy-0.8 and python2-sqlalchemy-0.8-migrate Since the move to 2014-1-b3 on the Openstack packages, we can now use the

Re: [aur-general] Disown request

Hello again, as discussed python2-routes now uses python2-repoze.lru as a dependency rather than python2-repoze-lru. this means that python2-repoze-lru can now be safely removed Thanks On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Felix Yan wrote: > On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 13:19:22 James Bulmer wr

Re: [aur-general] Disown request

just as a note, python2-repoze-lru only dependency is python2-routes so there will be no need for python2-repoze-lru after these changes On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:19 PM, James Bulmer wrote: > Awesome, > > so if you disown python2-repoze.lru, I will update the package and deploy >

Re: [aur-general] Disown request

12:54:05 James Bulmer wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Earlier today I put a request in to disown python2-routes, I now > > need python2-repoze-lru which is a dependency of python2-routes. It had > the > > same owner and is the same situation of not being updated in the la

[aur-general] Disown request

Hi. Earlier today I put a request in to disown python2-routes, I now need python2-repoze-lru which is a dependency of python2-routes. It had the same owner and is the same situation of not being updated in the last 2 years. Thanks again -- James

Re: [aur-general] Disown request

Thanks On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Martin Wimpress wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/03/14 11:46, James Bulmer wrote: > > Hi. > > > > could python2-routes be disowned, it has not been up dated in 2 years and > > is required for the port of Openstack to Arch Linu

[aur-general] Disown request

Hi. could python2-routes be disowned, it has not been up dated in 2 years and is required for the port of Openstack to Arch Linux Thanks -- James

[aur-general] Delete package from the AUR

Morning, I was a bit of a twerp and mistyped the name of a package, with this in mind could python2-oslo-rootwtap be removed. Thanks