Re: [aur-general] acroread package compromised

On 08/07/18 11:23, justus-...@piater.name wrote: > I'd also like to understand how xeactor took over the packages. The packages were probably orphaned. Were other possibly affected users informed? I know that AUR users should follow aur-general, but maybe not everybody does. There are no

Re: [aur-general] About package description (pkgdesc) size

On 26/01/16 04:29, Jimmy Latouche wrote: > I've got a simple question about submitting a package to AUR: the > PKGBUILD I'm working on is a scanner driver for EPSON printers, but > it's list of supported models is quite long and I wouldn't want to > left out some models unmentioned since users of

Re: [aur-general] Why is the package version still the old one?

On 29/11/15 12:18, Iru Cai wrote: > I updated babl-git, gegl-git, and gimp-git to AUR. Why are the version > of these packages still the old one? The version in depends is also > not updated. You need to update the .SRCINFO. You usually do this with running "mksrcinfo" (either manually before the

Re: [aur-general] How to install dependency that is in AUR

On 05/11/15 11:15, Félix Piédallu wrote: > Le 04/11/2015 17:50, Doug Newgard a écrit : >> On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:43:31 +0100 Ole Jon Bjørkum >> wrote: > >> If they can't figure out that AUR packages may depend on other AUR >> packages, they really have no business running Arch. >

Re: [aur-general] Out-of-date notifications

On 23/10/15 12:06, Eugenio M. Vigo wrote: > I'm still a bit new to mantaining AUR packages. The other day I noticed one > of my packages (rednotebook) was flagged to be out of date due to an > upstream update, but I noticed just because I was checking my AUR account > by chance. [...] I wonder

Re: [aur-general] max blob size exceeded

On 28/08/15 22:38, Jonathan Kotta wrote: I'm trying to submit avr-binutils-atmel from AUR3. It has a +600kB patch file that exceeds the size limit. Please increase the limit or tell me how to work around this. Patches that are valid for upstream can often be uploaded at the upstream

Re: [aur-general] Archive of AUR3 packages

On 18/08/15 17:00, autumn-w...@web.de wrote: Someone went along and uploaded every package from the aur-mirror as a separate Repo on Github. https://github.com/aur-archive Not sure if this is helping, or working as a Archive. As there are also repos of packages that got migrated to AUR4

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned packages on AUR4

Am 11.08.2015 um 14:08 schrieb Simon Hanna: On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:36:53AM +, Justin Dray wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:09 Antonio Rojas aro...@archlinux.org wrote: Rob McCathie korr...@gmail.com Wrote in message: Just a query: Why were packages i added to AUR4, ensured were in good

Re: [aur-general] [solved] perl: symbol lookup error: Util.so: undefined symbol: Perl_xs_apiversion_bootcheck

Am 09.07.2015 um 19:12 schrieb Ralf Mardorf: I deleted my comment from https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/shutter-bzr/ and right after I did it, there was a reply. I'll add a new comment and confirm that it works. Don't delete comments just because the problem is solved for you. You also

Re: [aur-general] cannot push to remote repository

Am 29.06.2015 um 07:34 schrieb Jozef Riha: anyone can please help me to understand why i am unable to push linux-pae{,-docs,-headers} into aur4? the pkgbuild was orphaned in aur3 for a long time, i adopted it today, but no luck. Not sure what a long time is for you. But

Re: [aur-general] lib32-libx264 or lib32-lib264-stable-git?

Am 25.06.2015 um 13:54 schrieb Νῖκος Θεοδώρου: On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:58:30 +0200 Johannes Dewender a...@jonnyjd.net wrote: Am 24.06.2015 um 17:43 schrieb Bartłomiej Piotrowski: The [extra] package is always set to some particular commit from stable branch. Well, yes. The AUR package

[aur-general] AUR 4 keywords: categories/tags or just search hints?

In AUR 4 categories were removed and we can now attach arbitrary keywords to packages. It is not clear what the exact purpose is though. If keywords really should be better categories (or tags) then the current implementation does't do that. Keywords are just more words that are searched with a

Re: [aur-general] lib32-libx264 or lib32-lib264-stable-git?

Am 24.06.2015 um 17:43 schrieb Bartłomiej Piotrowski: On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 15:00:14 +0300 Νῖκος Θεοδώρου ntheo1...@gmail.com wrote: Then they only kept git (master and stable). The [extra] package [1] pulls from git, but it's called libx264. Initially I called the lib32 version lib32-libx264

Re: [aur-general] Package Naming Of libvterm

Am 22.06.2015 um 15:32 schrieb Mark Weiman: I was contacted by maintainer fwalch and he wants to submit a package that is named libvterm and is from this site ( http://www.leonerd.org.uk/code/libvterm/) and is concerned with how he should name it and how my package libvterm (

Re: [aur-general] Package Naming Of libvterm

Am 22.06.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Johannes Dewender: http://www.leonerd.org.uk/code/libvterm/ by Paul LeoNerd Evans is the original libvterm from 2007 [1] (Copyright 2008 in LICENSE). There is a Launchpad project [2] and also a GitHub mirror [2] as part of the NeoVim project. The last commit

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

Am 20.06.2015 um 08:11 schrieb Karol Blazewicz: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdebase-konsole-xterm/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/konsole2xterm/ Are we OK with such ... packages? On AUR 3 which will be overwritten with AUR 4? Yes. The first one is also on AUR 4 and I added a

Re: [aur-general] Unable to upload a recently adopted package to aur4

Am 16.06.2015 um 19:13 schrieb Johannes Dewender: Am 16.06.2015 um 18:40 schrieb Oozy Slug: Hi, My AUR username is *oozyslug* I am unable to upload the *nix* aur package (i recently adopted) to AUR4 . * git-receive-pack: permission denied: oozyslug* What can i do to correct the problem

Re: [aur-general] Unable to upload a recently adopted package to aur4

Am 16.06.2015 um 18:40 schrieb Oozy Slug: Hi, My AUR username is *oozyslug* I am unable to upload the *nix* aur package (i recently adopted) to AUR4 . My ssh key and config setup are proper since i dont have any trouble with my other aur package *gedit-rust-git* I am able to git clone the

[aur-general] My AUR4 migration workflow

Generate .SRCINFO for all packages: $ while read p; do git -C $p filter-branch -f --tree-filter test -f .SRCINFO || mksrcinfo; done ../pkgs Don't do it like that. This creates a .SRCINFO from the first PKGBUILD of the package and doesn't update the file for later commits

Re: [aur-general] My AUR4 migration workflow

Generate .SRCINFO for all packages: $ while read p; do git -C $p filter-branch -f --tree-filter test -f .SRCINFO || mksrcinfo; done ../pkgs Don't do it like that. This creates a .SRCINFO from the first PKGBUILD of the package and doesn't update the file for later commits anymore. So

Re: [aur-general] Removing godep-git (no)

Am 23.05.2014 06:46, schrieb Sauyon Lee: I recently uploaded a sadly very broken PKGBUILD to the AUR and named it godep-git. However, after reading the packaging guidelines, I've decided that it really should be just godep, as the project has no releases, so I'm going to be uploading a working

Re: [aur-general] Removing godep-git (no)

Am 23.05.2014 11:22, schrieb Sauyon Lee: As noted on https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Go_Package_Guidelines#Naming, most go packages would end up becoming VCS packages, and having suffixes for no reason is a bit of a pain. They *are* VCS packges. Naming doesn't change anything about it.

[aur-general] Remove picard-plugins (now part of picard)

Hello, please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/picard-plugins/ All plugins of that package are now directly included in picard and picard-git (since 3 weeks ago) I am the creator and was the last maintainer of that package. There are other plugin-related packages that include

[aur-general] remove python-keyczar (Python 2 only)

Hello, please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-keyczar/ This name always was a Python 2 package and is available since 2012 here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-keyczar I checked, keyczar does not run on Python 3 at all. -- JonnyJD

[aur-general] Please remove cov-analysis-bin (no download)

Pleare remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cov-analysis-bin/ from the AUR. I created the package and was the last maintainer. However, upstream removed any possibility to download even the binary of the tool without logging in. So there is no sense to include it in the AUR anymore.

Re: [aur-general] Please remove cov-analysis-bin (no download)

Am 12.01.2014 14:11, schrieb Evgeniy Alekseev: On Sunday 12 January 2014 12:43:47 Johannes Dewender wrote: Pleare remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cov-analysis-bin/ from the AUR. I created the package and was the last maintainer. However, upstream removed any possibility to download

Re: [aur-general] Please remove cov-analysis-bin (no download)

Am 12.01.2014 16:03, schrieb Evgeniy Alekseev: On Sunday 12 January 2014 15:55:13 Johannes Dewender wrote: Am 12.01.2014 14:11, schrieb Evgeniy Alekseev: On Sunday 12 January 2014 12:43:47 Johannes Dewender wrote: Pleare remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cov-analysis-bin/ from the AUR

[aur-general] Please orphan xrdp-git

Please orphan https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xrdp-git/ The last changes were requested in June and the package is also flagged as as out-of-date since then. Nothing happened. There are two people that might maintain, including myself, since I do have an updated PKGBUILD. There is also

[aur-general] install vs. cp/mkdir (was: Re: New package: hubflow-git)

Am Samstag 23 März 2013, 06:34:37 schrieb Xyne: Always use install instead of of combinations of mkdir, mv, cp and chmod whenever possible. I would go d'accord with Always consider using 'install' vs However I do not understand why one should Always use install. And everytime I ask about

[aur-general] merge gitpython into python2-gitpython

Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gitpython/ (orphan) into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-gitpython/ Both are the same project (having 1 repo on github and one on gitorious (which links to github again) and it is a library, not an application. No packages dependend

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

Am Donnerstag 14 März 2013, 09:39:24 schrieb Anntoin Wilkinson: I don't think there is a problem with this package existing. Some people don't want Gnome dependencies. It would be nice if someone was maintaining the package, but it's not a requirement. Also the previous maintainer has

[aur-general] merge picard-plugins-lastfmplus into picard-plugins

Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/picard-plugins-lastfmplus/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/picard-plugins/ The lastfmplus plugin is now included in the base plugin package. -- JonnyJD signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] please remove osc-source_validator-git

The package osc-source_validator-git [1] should be removed. osc-source_validator is now provided by the package obs-service-source_validator [2] directly, which previously required it externally. FYI: OBS = Open Build Service (by openSUSE) You can work on the OBS with the osc package and

[aur-general] FYI: PKGBUILDs in Ohloh

Hello, TLDNR: A collection of multiple PKGBUILD repositories (from multiple users!) is listed at this Ohloh project: https://www.ohloh.net/p/aur-pkgbuilds Feel free to add your own, but not aur-mirror.git (see below) long story: I like Ohloh for an overview of open source contributions and

[aur-general] request removal: perl-file-fctnllock

Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-file-fctnllock/ (which I created yesterday) There is a typo in the name, I realized that a couple of hours later and created the correct package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl- file-fcntllock/ -- JonnyJD signature.asc