[aur-general] I can't update or upload packages in AUR

2009-02-25 Thread José Valecillos
CARCH}" == "i686" ]; then flags="${flags} --disable-nasm" fi ./configure --prefix=/usr $flags make || return 1 make DESTDIR="$startdir/pkg" install cd ../dfOpenGL make clean make || return 1 install -m755 libdfOpenGL.so ${startdir}/pkg/usr/lib/games/psemu/libdfOpenGL.so } md5sums=('9315b421396a34bfd57be5d25f88dff7' '36ccf31d0b88f099bf4acd6a16b5b04c') -- José Valecillos

Re: [aur-general] I can't update or upload packages in AUR

2009-02-25 Thread José Valecillos
I drop these line and works...I don't know exactly what is the function os this line anyway... It was in the PKGBUILD of the original owner. Thanks for answer! -- José Valecillos

Re: [aur-general] Delete duplicate xampp package

2009-03-16 Thread José Valecillos
I've already fixed x86_64 support. Ok, In this case after Jeff orphan her package I'll take it, therefore please delete xampp-linux. But, what happen with the 45 votes of xampp-linux?. You must take into account that. -- José Valecillos

Re: [aur-general] Delete duplicate xampp package

2009-03-16 Thread José Valecillos
Thanks :) -- José Valecillos

[aur-general] Bad PKBUILD and out of date package

2009-03-24 Thread José Valecillos
Greetings! The joyutils package in the aur seems to be out of date and not updated for a long while. On the other hand, that PKGBUILD have a binary file, this isn't even allowed. Can you orphand it? -- José Valecillos

[aur-general] Please delete a package

2009-03-24 Thread José Valecillos
I commited a mistake uploading one of my packages, then the xammp-linux package is a error. Can you delete please -- José Valecillos

Re: [aur-general] Please delete a package

2009-03-25 Thread José Valecillos
My error was upload the same PKBUILD of an anterior name of the package. The xammp is the correct package and xammp-linux must be deleted. 2009/3/24, Dieter Plaetinck : > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:19:34 +1930 > José Valecillos wrote: > >> I commited a mistake uploading one of my pac

Re: [aur-general] Maintainer vs Contributor tag let's find a solution ; )

2009-04-05 Thread José Valecillos
I like option 1.- Should I remove the past contributor and add myself as a Contributor?. This is exactly like it is in /usr/share/pacman/PKGBUILD.proto example. -- José Valecillos

Re: [aur-general] Maintainer vs Contributor tag let's find a solution ; )

2009-04-05 Thread José Valecillos
Then you must add all the past Contributors, even if they are 10 or 100?. On the other hand, in the web interface or when you install the package it don't show anything about the contributor, this should be there I think, dont' you?. I mean, you only can know who is the contributor if you open the

Re: [aur-general] Huge packages in community

2009-05-03 Thread José Valecillos
acman#General_Options Correct me if I'm wrong -- José Valecillos

Re: [aur-general] 3 packages needing to be orphaned

2009-05-07 Thread José Valecillos
Biru Ionut wrote: >> Nate Crouch wrote: >>> >>> avast 1.0.8-1 >>> avg-free r51-2 >>> fprot fp-1 >>> >> >> done >> -- >> Ionut >> > -- José Valecillos

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning of 44 packages

2009-05-17 Thread José Valecillos
dosbox-cvs and violet adopted!

Re: [aur-general] The KDE 4.3 update for packagers

2009-08-04 Thread José Valecillos
Its great, now no more phonon related issues, i hope so... -- José Valecillos

[aur-general] Orphan Request

2010-01-05 Thread José Valecillos
Hello, can you please orphan "bashish" package?. The maintainer doesn't updated it since 19 Sep 2006, and currently is flagged out of date. -- José Valecillos

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request

2010-01-05 Thread José Valecillos
Yes, I Tried. But there is a recipient failure on the email, because the domain don't even exist currently.

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request

2010-01-05 Thread José Valecillos
Estaré pendiente para la próxima, Gracias.

[aur-general] Change of Package Name

2010-01-15 Thread José Valecillos
one. I have no problem to update the PKGBUILD, but i need to change the name of the package because it won't be CVS anymore. Can any TU help me with that? -- José Valecillos

Re: [aur-general] Change of Package Name

2010-01-16 Thread José Valecillos
Ok, I lost my time, because x-daemon submit it before than i do, just hours before. The funny thing is that I had it already, just seeking to rename the package first. -- José Valecillos

[aur-general] Request deletion

2010-01-16 Thread José Valecillos
Hi everybody, can any TU please delete dosbox-cvs package, it's has been replaced with dosbox-svn since CVS repository is deprecated and isn't mantained anymore. -- José Valecillos

[aur-general] Delete request

2010-09-01 Thread José Valecillos
Can you please delete gwibber-microft-bzr, gwibber-sqlite-backend-bzr, gwibber-sweston-bzr, gwibber-trunk-bzr and gwibber2.0 ? All that packages has been orphan by his maintainers or, in the case of gwibber-sweston-bzr, are no maintained anymore. These packages are just older and custom versi

Re: [aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup

2010-10-05 Thread José Valecillos
On 10/03/2010 01:24 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: Hi TUs, I've just created a new proposal concerning the orphaning of all packages marked 'out of date' which have not been updated (or submitted) since before January 1st, 2009. For details, see the actual proposal text. The voting period ends on

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning request

2010-10-05 Thread José Valecillos
On 10/05/2010 01:19 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: Am 05.10.2010 17:40, schrieb Adam Hani Schakaki: On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:48:10 -0500 Thomas Dziedzic wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Adam Hani Schakaki wrote: On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:28:16 -0500 Thomas Dziedzic wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: Linux Manga Downloader

2012-05-09 Thread José Valecillos
Hi Jorge, First af all, Thanks for submit linux-manga-downloader, I think it's a nice app. But, I wonder: Why about contact app's developer?. May be he would share the source code of LMD, the app has GPL licence after all. In this way, it would be easier make a package. Best Regards, 2012/5/9 Jo

Re: [aur-general] Not the way to go: teamviewer and teamviewer-stable

2012-05-28 Thread José Valecillos
Is stupid, he is just eagerness for take over the package. I use teamviewer and the current maintainer update the package very often (more than I'd like). 2012/5/28 Christian Stadegaart : > Maandag 28 Mei 2012 om 21:41 (CEST +0200) schreef Andrea Scarpino: > > >> On Monday 28 May 2012 20:57:58 Chr

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request [5/27]

2013-05-27 Thread José Valecillos
I used to maintain acroread. I had already updated it. How do you take over the package without asking for first?. Limao must have contacted me then. 2013/5/27 Connor Behan > On 27/05/13 01:14 PM, Limao Luo wrote: > > The following packages > > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/acroread/ >