py?
Check:
https://aur.archlinux.org/account/blippy
or:
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=neoleo
On Feb 12, 2017 06:06, "Jude DaShiell" wrote:
I have many questions about aur package neoleo operation.
--
--
I have many questions about aur package neoleo operation.
--
Has anyone figured out how to get that package to build and install yet?
It would be nice to have a spreadsheet cli users could use with more
available functions in it than sc or sc-im. I never did find out whether
oleo would fit this bill since I can't get it to build so I can find out.
--
, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 01:57:59
From: Jude DaShiell
Reply-To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
To: aur-gene...@lists.archlinux.org
Subject: [aur-general] yaourt certs access problem
When I try using yourt for searches I get:
curl error: Proble
When I try using yourt for searches I get:
curl error: Problem with the SSL CA cert (path? access rights?)
I had a network failure a week ago and ended up reinstalling
talkingarchlinux and didn't have this problem with my earlier
installation.
I thought adding a newcerts directory fixed this p
From: Doug Newgard
Reply-To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] yaourt can't access ssl certs
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:01:07 -0400 (EDT)
Jude DaShiell wrote:
I installed yaourt on an earlier system and
I installed yaourt on an earlier system and never had this problem then.
Has anyone else had this problem and if you've cleared the problem could
you explain how?
--
The oleo package now is having I think three different problems making its
documentation. The patch file error appears to have been corrected which
is good news.
--
On Thu, 5 May 2016, Eli Schwartz wrote:
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 21:27:04
From: Eli Schwartz
Reply-To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] a build failure case
On 05/05/2016 08:59 PM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
o
oleo in aur for amd athelon k8 fails to build because a dif file the
package needs is not at the specified url. I realize several other kinds
of build failures exist depending on particular packages in aur and what I
propose here will not cover those kind of cases.
For oleo though, might it be
rote:
On 05/05/2016 09:16 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
What are proper criteria for flagging a package out of date? My reason
for asking has to do with:
http://www.floodgap.com/software/ttytter/
--
Well, it is currently flagged out of date:
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/tty
What are proper criteria for flagging a package out of date? My reason
for asking has to do with:
http://www.floodgap.com/software/ttytter/
--
The source file astrolog.dat is not one to delete from the build of the
astrolog package. At a minimum it ought to go into /usr/share/astrolog
since it is a configuration file the installed astrolog package will use
if it finds it in the right place. The default for astrolog is to look
for as
13 matches
Mail list logo
