Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR

2009-02-20 Thread Loui Chang
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:03:50AM +0100, stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: > findwild was mine, I did a fresh upload, that fixed it. > I deleted micq (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7928) because > last update was 2006 and the maintainer did not respond to the comments > of several users

Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR

2009-02-20 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 06:50:18PM -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:19, Loui Chang wrote: > > Where are you seeing 'poop'? > > I was seeing it too, when I used the link from a notification email. I > think it happens when the URL is

Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR

2009-02-20 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 06:50:18PM -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:19, Loui Chang wrote: > > Where are you seeing 'poop'? > > I was seeing it too, when I used the link from a notification email. I > think it happens when the URL is

Re: [aur-general] Discussion regarding TU Swiergot

2009-02-21 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 01:51:43PM -0500, Ghost1227 wrote: > Over the last few months, I have noticed that TU Swiergot has neglected his > packages in community. I first noticed this with the cinelerra-cv package > which was several months out of date and using the now-defunct cvs repo > (ci

Re: [aur-general] Discussion regarding TU Swiergot

2009-02-21 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 07:48:10AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Loui Chang wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 01:51:43PM -0500, Ghost1227 wrote: > > > >> Over the last few months, I have noticed that TU Swiergot has neglected > >> his packages in communi

Re: [aur-general] pkgs that are in community and have "lost" tar.gz in unsupported.

2009-02-22 Thread Loui Chang
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:28:42PM -0200, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > I do not know if this is intentional, but when in doubt I will let you know. > I did a comparison of the existence of packages that are > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/{pkgname}/ and also in > community/{category}/{pkgnam

Re: [aur-general] I can't update or upload packages in AUR

2009-02-25 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 07:12:51PM +1930, José Valecillos wrote: > Hello, I have a problem, when i try to upload any package in AUR here: > http://aur.archlinux.org/pkgsubmit.php > uploading ends (after ~1 min) by just a blank page. It's AUR bug? I can't > update my package about 3 days. I can't up

Re: [aur-general] I can't update or upload packages in AUR

2009-02-26 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 05:20:43PM +0100, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: > I've had this problem with qtcreator but suddenly after several days > of trying to upload it it uploaded. The problem won't be magically fixed after a few days. It was a change in the parser that solved it.

Re: [aur-general] moreutils in community

2009-02-26 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:07:28AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: > > Hello, > > > > according to the recent proposal (see > > http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-December/003207.html) > > there should not be packages added to community with less tha

Re: [aur-general] moreutils in community

2009-02-26 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 06:10:19PM -0500, Loui Chang wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:07:28AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > according to the recent proposal (see > > > http://www.arch

Re: [aur-general] pkgs that are in community and have "lost" tar.gz in unsupported.

2009-03-03 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 03:25:38PM -0200, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Loui Chang wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:28:42PM -0200, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > > > >> I do not know if this is intentional, but when in doubt I will let you > >> kno

[aur-general] [NOTICE] Dummy packages (was: package removal request v2)

2009-03-03 Thread Loui Chang
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 03:04:48AM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 11:18:00AM -0500, Loui Chang wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:14:35AM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=115 > > > >

Re: [aur-general] status moving to official db scripts?

2009-03-05 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:46:49AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Andrea Scarpino wrote: > > 2009/3/5 Aaron Griffin : > > > >> But, I guess you're right > >> that the AUR needs some sort of changes in order to be able to do > >> this. > >> > >> > > Maybe we must only edit run-tupkgupdate and

Re: [aur-general] Deletion requested

2009-03-08 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 09:03:47PM +0100, Angelo Theodorou wrote: > Thank you for deleting the fmodex package, but still I cannot upload > the updated archive! :-( Please file a bug report if you have problems.

Re: [aur-general] [PATCH] initial support for any architecture.

2009-03-11 Thread Loui Chang
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:24:17AM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Phil Dillon-Thiselton > wrote: > > 2009/3/11 Abhishek Dasgupta : > >> done > >> repo_unlock > >> > >> Sorry for the typo, this repo_unlock should not be there. > >> > >> -- > >> Abhishek > >> > > > >

Re: [aur-general] How about hashtags in package description?

2009-03-15 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:49:06AM +0200, Vitaliy Berdinskikh wrote: > We have the limited category list. > > Sometimes I need accurate description when package can use. > > How about to use hashtags like #hamradio etc. What's the practical difference between a tag and a hashtag?

Re: [aur-general] How about hashtags in package description?

2009-03-15 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 08:32:29PM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:55:01 +0100 > Jens Maucher wrote: > > > Am Sonntag 15 März 2009 17:00:05 schrieb Pierre Chapuis: > > > Le Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:54:12 -0400, > > > > > > Daenyth Blank a écrit : > > > > > What's the practical

Re: [aur-general] Delete duplicate xampp package

2009-03-16 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 07:57:35PM -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote: > 2009/3/16 Daenyth Blank : > > 2009/3/16 José Valecillos : > >> I've already fixed x86_64 support. > >> Ok, In this case after Jeff orphan her package I'll take it, therefore > >> please delete xampp-linux. But, what happen with the 45

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Chris Brannon

2009-03-17 Thread Loui Chang
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:35:27AM -0500, Chris Brannon wrote: > I want to do my part to make ArchLinux more accessible to the blind. > My first order of business is to submit two packages to the community > repository: speakup and espeakup. > These two packages provide one reliable method of suppl

Re: [aur-general] Redirection of package

2009-03-24 Thread Loui Chang
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:56:20AM +0100, Cilyan Olowen wrote: > I was wondering if it is possible to redirect one package to another, > and if it was possible in unsupported. > > For example, python bindings for poppler are currently, but probably > will stay like this, a bazaar repository. The f

Re: [aur-general] System cleaning?

2009-03-25 Thread Loui Chang
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:54:44PM -0400, Andrei Thorp wrote: > Sorry, better use: > > pacman -Rs $(pacman -Qdt | sed "s/ .*//") pacman -Qqdt

Re: [aur-general] Voting period: Chris Brannon

2009-03-30 Thread Loui Chang
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 02:45:56PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Allan McRae wrote: > > Hi TUs, > > > > It is time to vote so head to the AUR voting interface. You can refresh > > your memory here: > > http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-March/004104.html > > And voting is now f

Re: [aur-general] Voting period: Chris Brannon

2009-03-31 Thread Loui Chang
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 07:54:32PM +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Loui Chang schrieb: > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 02:45:56PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > >> Allan McRae wrote: > >>> Hi TUs, > >>> > >>> It is time to vote so head to the AUR

Re: [aur-general] TU appliance Jens Maucher (defcon)

2009-04-04 Thread Loui Chang
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 08:03:21PM -0400, Daniel J Griffiths wrote: > Daenyth Blank wrote: > > In addition to this, the PKGBUILDs he maintained were generally of > > pretty low quality, at least from my perspective. > > Took the words right outta my mouth. I think a little elaboration there migh

Re: [aur-general] TU appliance Jens Maucher (defcon)

2009-04-04 Thread Loui Chang
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 10:08:50PM +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote: > the voting period for Defcon has ended, and he did not get the majority of > votes. He got four times "yes", eleven times "no" and four abstains. > > So, that is democracy, but it would be nice if there would be some > discuss

Re: [aur-general] TU appliance Jens Maucher (defcon)

2009-04-05 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 06:19:51PM +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote: > install -d is preferable over mkdir -p, but also in extra are > packages, that do not fullfil this point. I think using one or the other really depends on the situation. I don't think that's something that should be picked on at a

Re: [aur-general] Maintainer vs Contributor tag let's find a solution ; )

2009-04-05 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:20:41PM +1930, Angel Velásquez wrote: > Hi, this thread were discussed in the history, so I think is time to > clarify and put the correct information to the wiki. (Actually on the > recent TU application and sunjdk package). > > IIRC: > > a) Maintainer tag in PKGBUILD

Re: [aur-general] Submitting a new package (sunjdk)

2009-04-05 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:01:46AM +0200, M Rawash wrote: > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 19:57 +1930, Angel Velásquez wrote: > > > it's *not* a duplicate, i just cited the lack of updates as one of the > > > reasons i forked the package, you can review sunjdk here: > > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.

Re: [aur-general] Maintainer vs Contributor tag let's find a solution ; )

2009-04-05 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:43:41PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > # Maintainer: Joe User > > Note the use of Maintainer... In the end, it is a comment and nothing more > so who really cares about this. Yep.

Re: [aur-general] Request deletion lv2-c++-tools

2009-04-06 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:58:58PM +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote: > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:43:22 -0400 > Daenyth Blank wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 08:34, wrote: > > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23651 > > > > > > It seems like the c++ in the name causes problems, at least wi

Re: [aur-general] How to handle interchangeable dependencies?

2009-04-06 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:55:52PM +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote: > So this is a bug in yaourt, the second today it seems. > Guess I start hunting for the yaourt and namcap bugtrackers.. When tracking down bugs please do not pollute your results by relying on unsupported scripts.

Re: [aur-general] How to handle interchangeable dependencies?

2009-04-06 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:45:43PM +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote: > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:34:03 -0400 > Loui Chang wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:55:52PM +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote: > > > So this is a bug in yaourt, the second today it seems. > > &

Re: [aur-general] How to handle interchangeable dependencies?

2009-04-06 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 04:21:53PM +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote: > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:02:41 -0400 > Loui Chang wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:45:43PM +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:34:03 -0400 > > > Loui Chang wrote: &g

Re: [aur-general] Maintainer vs Contributor tag let's find a solution ; )

2009-04-06 Thread Loui Chang
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 10:56:33AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > My summary of this: > > 1) Maintainer tag: It is a comment - makepkg does not care so nor should > you > > 2) $foo vs ${foo} : they do the same thing (except in rare cases where > brackets are needed...) - makepkg does not car

Re: [aur-general] Wasn't Community supposed to be removed from AUR?

2009-04-11 Thread Loui Chang
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 04:25:27PM -0700, Smartboy wrote: > Weren't community packages supposed to be removed from AUR? I thought > there was consensus months ago to remove it. It's in the works.

Re: [aur-general] Questions from a new TU

2009-04-12 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 11:23:07PM +0200, Xyne wrote: > Allan McRae wrote: > > > The .PKGINFO file is created by makepkg and compressed inside the > > package. When you upload a package to the server, this file is > > extracted and an entry is made for the pacman database using this > > infor

Re: [aur-general] Voting period: Biru Ionut (wonder)

2009-04-17 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:19:16PM -0300, Hugo Doria wrote: > And the voting period has ended. > > The results are: > 17 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain. > > So welcome Biru as a new TU. Congratulations, wonder!! Nice! Congrats Biru.

[aur-general] Inactivity

2009-04-17 Thread Loui Chang
Hey everyone. Next week I'm leaving for Taiwan for a month. I don't expect to be doing much for Arch for around two months though. So, I'll mark myself as inactive in the wiki. Of course, don't be afraid to poke at my packages if there's a need. Cheers!

Re: [aur-general] Page package offline

2009-06-05 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 04:48:57PM -0300, corvolino wrote: > well, the more or less 2 months i'm trying to compile the package > xmms-wma[1]. However your page is offline. > Already left message on the page maintener and not answered. > > [1] http://mcmcc.bat.ru/xmms-wma There is no maintainer fo

Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch

2009-06-12 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri 12 Jun 2009 20:15 +0200, Christoph Zeiler wrote: > This is to > > a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to > maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of > them. > > b) say "Thank you!" to everybody who notified me of outdated packages,

Re: [aur-general] Moving the AUR/community

2009-06-24 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu 25 Jun 2009 00:03 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > May i suggest something slightly relevant, but probably very radical? > Disable comments on AUR completely. > I dont think there is a question about its usefulness in [community], > not even TU's themselves > http://aur.archlinux.org/packa

Re: [aur-general] Removing comments from AUR

2009-06-24 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu 25 Jun 2009 00:43 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > Maybe the maintainer should be able to add comments then? > Instead of having 100 user comments out of which 5-10, at best, are relevant > and useful. > eg. One package needs -Sf cause its a custom kernel or something > I email the maintai

Re: [aur-general] Removing comments from AUR

2009-06-24 Thread Loui Chang
On Wed 24 Jun 2009 23:53 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote: > why not allow the maintainers in unsupported to delete comments for their > packages, I don't think it will be too much misused? I remove from time to > time the crap out of the comments in my community/aur packages so only the > more relev

Re: [aur-general] Removing comments from AUR

2009-06-25 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu 25 Jun 2009 13:23 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Xavier wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:44 AM, bardo wrote: > > > > > > Keep the information where it belongs (on the package page) and keep a > > > clean structure (don't put everything in one pl

Re: [aur-general] Removing comments from AUR

2009-06-25 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu 25 Jun 2009 14:03 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > Instead, what happened. The package was left unmaintained for 1.5 year > (i assume it was > updated today which might be wrong) but anyway it was certainly left > unmaintained for some > time , and the issue that this comment was meant to

Re: [aur-general] Removing comments from AUR: epilogue

2009-06-25 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri 26 Jun 2009 21:00 +1930, Angel Velásquez wrote: > Sorry, but I have to write this... > > Grig, "you are peeing far away from the toillet" (that's means that > your thougts just are wrong), btw I replied in your bug report :) Damn, that's a good one. How do you say that in Spanish?

[aur-general] AUR Moving

2009-06-26 Thread Loui Chang
Hey users and trusted users. The AUR will be moving to a new server tomorrow June 27, 2009 around 12:00:00 -0500. Expect some downtime. Cheers!

Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving

2009-06-27 Thread Loui Chang
On Sat 27 Jun 2009 12:31 +0530, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > 2009/6/27 Aaron Griffin : > > A few notes to the TUs: > > > > * Make sure you have checked out via "aur.archlinux.org" and > > everything should go smoothly for you > > * Later tomorrow, please send me an ssh key for use on the machine, > >

Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving

2009-06-27 Thread Loui Chang
On Sat 27 Jun 2009 16:57 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote: > On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Aaron Griffin > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > > > Hey users and trusted users. > > > The AUR will be moving to a new server tomorrow Ju

[aur-general] The AUR move semi complete

2009-06-27 Thread Loui Chang
The web site is running and users can interact with the AUR in most of the usual ways. Mail still needs to be set up properly so notifications aren't working right now. I'll also need some more time for setting up community. Syncing the whole repo is taking longer than anticipated.

Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving

2009-06-27 Thread Loui Chang
On Sat 27 Jun 2009 20:25 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > OK so this scheme is apparently a big deal for some of you. If you'd > like an alternate username, let me know - I can change it if you want Silly. TUs, you can set your ssh config so it will be no hassle on your part to have a different usern

Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving

2009-06-27 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun 28 Jun 2009 05:17 +0200, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On 28/06/2009, Aaron Griffin wrote: > > OK, I've setup 4 accounts. I decided to use the > name> scheme here. > > > > pmatias, ibiru, cbrannon, and mherych all have accounts. Please send > > me an ssh key so I can set up your account > > > >

[aur-general] [NOTICE] For Trusted Users. Update your CVS settings.

2009-06-28 Thread Loui Chang
The new CVS setup uses ssh, so you will need a shell account. Please email me your ssh public key to set that up. For dealing with CVS please follow these instructions: Set CVS_RSH in your shell export CVS_RSH=ssh Update your CVSROOT settings to :ext:u...@aur.archlinux.org:/srv/cvs/community Wh

Re: [aur-general] [NOTICE] For Trusted Users. Update your CVS settings.

2009-06-28 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun 28 Jun 2009 04:08 -0400, Loui Chang wrote: > The quick way of changing your CVSROOT > cd to directory with community checkout: > find -name Root -exec sed -i > 's/^:pserver.*/:ext:u...@archlinux.org:/srv/cvs/community/' {} \; Oops that line should be: find -name

Re: [aur-general] [NOTICE] For Trusted Users. Update your CVS settings.

2009-06-28 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun 28 Jun 2009 09:54 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Loui Chang wrote: > > On Sun 28 Jun 2009 04:08 -0400, Loui Chang wrote: > >> The quick way of changing your CVSROOT > >> cd to directory with community checkout: > >>  f

Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving

2009-06-28 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun 28 Jun 2009 20:28 +0200, bardo wrote: > 2009/6/28 Xyne : > > After a bit of ssh wiki'ing I can confirm that everything seems to be > > working here. I've added a link to the "Using SSH Keys" page on the > > "AUR Trusted User Guidelines" page, with a specific mention of the > > ssh-agent in c

Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving

2009-06-28 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun 28 Jun 2009 16:47 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > > On Sun 28 Jun 2009 20:28 +0200, bardo wrote: > >> 2009/6/28 Xyne : > >> > After a bit of ssh wiki'ing I can confirm that everything seems to be > &

Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving

2009-06-29 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon 29 Jun 2009 16:09 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > > Pierre Schmitz wrote: > >> > >> On Monday 29 June 2009 18:03:50 Aaron Griffin wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Abhishek Dasgupta > >>> wrote: > >>> > >

Re: [aur-general] new version for package holdingnuts

2009-06-30 Thread Loui Chang
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Dominik Geyer wrote: > > the old maintainer of the holdingnuts package seems to be inactive now > > (had contact with him via mail). At the package's page it says > > there's no maintainer. Is there a chance finding a new maintainer for it? > > > > There's a new

Re: [aur-general] communitypkg does not work

2009-07-01 Thread Loui Chang
On Wed 01 Jul 2009 14:43 +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote: > --- Original message --- > From: bardo > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > Subject: Re: [aur-general] communitypkg does not work > Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:53:09 +0200 > >b> 2009/7/1 Stefan Husmann : > >> I cannot u

Re: [aur-general] rsync for AUR

2009-07-01 Thread Loui Chang
On Tue 30 Jun 2009 13:55 +0530, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > Is it feasible to setup an rsync for AUR packages? > Would it increase load on the server a lot? I don't know that much about rsync yet, but I do imagine that it would create a lot more unneeded traffic. Who really needs to keep copies of

Re: [aur-general] Missing Packages

2009-07-01 Thread Loui Chang
On Wed 01 Jul 2009 11:20 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:15 AM, wrote: > > Missing i686 Packages: > > No new package supplied for gambas2 2.13.1-2! > > No new package supplied for warzone2100 2.1.2-1! > > No new package supplied for linphone 3.1.2-2! > > No new package supp

Re: [aur-general] AUR webpage

2009-07-01 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu 02 Jul 2009 02:18 +0200, Xyne wrote: > nathan duane wrote: > > > I have a suggestion, it would be nice to have a text editor for the AUR page > > so u could edit your PKGBUILDs without having to download then resubmit > > I think that's an interesting idea and it should only need a few tw

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

2009-07-03 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri 03 Jul 2009 14:40 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > nathan owe. wrote: > >Well my name is Nathan Owe. I am applying to be a TU, a person > >with the username Ghost1227 looked at some of my pkgs i have made, > >and he made suggestions on what i should do to improve my > >PKGBUILDs. well i download

Re: [aur-general] Application for TU

2009-07-03 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri 03 Jul 2009 11:46 -0300, corvolino wrote: > Thanks all for your comments and suggestions. All the changes were made. I > will welcome any new feedback. Awesome. You forgot amule-upnp though! The url should be a string rather than an array. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/amule-upnp/amule-

Re: [aur-general] Application for TU

2009-07-03 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri 03 Jul 2009 14:09 -0300, corvolino wrote: > Because he has no patch. My sponsor suggested that i leave is because the > original version was not compatible with you source. > > 2009/7/3 Loui Chang > > Awesome. You forgot amule-upnp though! > > The url should be

Re: [aur-general] script for running namcap on a AUR maintainer's packages

2009-07-03 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri 03 Jul 2009 22:18 +0530, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > It's useful to run namcap on a maintainer's packages on the > AUR, especially when people apply for TU. This pair of scripts > fetches the package names belonging to a maintainer (it only > fetches the first 100 results though) and the seco

Re: [aur-general] CVS problem? AUR Comment for moovida

2009-07-05 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun 05 Jul 2009 15:22 +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote: > I got an AUR Comment for my package moovida, that the CVS button dos > not work. What did I do wrong? The cvs repository on repos.archlinux.org doesn't reflect the current repo, so if your package was added after the AUR move then it won't sh

Re: [aur-general] Disowning monsoon, monotorrent and mono-nat

2009-07-06 Thread Loui Chang
On Tue 07 Jul 2009 10:03 +1930, Angel Velásquez wrote: > Just orphan them and somebody will adopt them, simply you DON'T have > to tell us that you are orphanizing or adopting unsupported packages. > > This message is for everybody (not just Tomás), please don't send > e-mails to the list when you

Re: [aur-general] CVS freeze and move to SVN/official tools

2009-07-15 Thread Loui Chang
On Wed 15 Jul 2009 20:55 +0530, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > 2009/7/15 Aaron Griffin : > > Hey guys, > > I'd like to put a freeze on community CVS later today. Sadly, CVS > > doesn't respect files set to RO, so there's not too much I can do > > server-side. > > > > I'm going to do the SVN conversion

Re: [aur-general] CVS freeze and move to SVN/official tools

2009-07-15 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu 16 Jul 2009 00:37 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > Loui, do you need to do anything with the AUR now? Nothing critical. I will dummify community packages that are in the AUR. Maybe when we set up the web interface for community?

Re: [aur-general] CVS freeze and move to SVN/official tools

2009-07-16 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu 16 Jul 2009 10:23 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:17 AM, Biru Ionut wrote: > > Aaron Griffin wrote: > > > >> When running the dbscripts, you'll need to use /arch/db-community{,64} > >> - or manually /arch/db-update community {i686,x86_64} - ignore the > >> scripts for

Re: [aur-general] CVS freeze and move to SVN/official tools

2009-07-16 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu 16 Jul 2009 19:23 -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > > Loui Chang wrote: > >> > >> aur should be for the AUR admins. > >> tusers is for trusted users. > >> > > > > Can I be added to t

Re: [aur-general] There is a "lost" pkg.tar.gz in FTP

2009-07-17 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri 17 Jul 2009 15:03 -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > ncftp /community/os/i686 > ls -l xf4vnc-xvnc-20090715-* > -rw-rw-r--1 99 990 Jul 16 02:01 > xf4vnc-xvnc-20090715-1.pkg.tar.gz > -rw-rw-r--1 99 99 740041 Jul 17 07:01 > xf4vnc-xvnc-20090715-

Re: [aur-general] There is a "lost" pkg.tar.gz in FTP

2009-07-17 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri 17 Jul 2009 15:25 -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Loui Chang wrote: > > On Fri 17 Jul 2009 15:03 -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > > > >> ncftp /community/os/i686 > ls -l xf4vnc-xvnc-20090715-* > >> -rw-rw-r--1 99 99

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

2009-07-20 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon 20 Jul 2009 14:19 -0400, Daniel J Griffiths wrote: > Ryan Coyner wrote: > >Please delete python-pysvn: > > > >http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16344 > > > >A more up-to-date package exists: > > > >http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21007 > > > Hmm shouldn't pysvn be renamed to

Re: [aur-general] java package has build time deps

2009-07-20 Thread Loui Chang
On Tue 21 Jul 2009 01:03 +0400, svoufff wrote: > yes the jsampler release version contains them but not jsampler from > cvs. > > Le Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:56:55 +, > Laszlo Papp a écrit : > > > Is there any package/program which contains this files ? > > > > Best Regards, > > Laszlo Papp > >

Re: [aur-general] Package search for community repo

2009-07-23 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu 23 Jul 2009 22:04 +0530, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > 2009/7/23 Roman Kyrylych : > > This is absolutely no-go because this way bugtracker will be flooded > > with out-of date messages > > that have no useful information. > > Agreed. The web interface is the best place to mark out-of-date. For

Re: [aur-general] Package search for community repo

2009-07-23 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri 24 Jul 2009 08:59 +0530, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > 2009/7/23 Loui Chang : > > On Thu 23 Jul 2009 22:04 +0530, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > >> This information could be kept archived somewhere. A simple HTML dump > >> of the all the community package pages would suf

Re: [aur-general] Reinstall dependencies

2009-07-25 Thread Loui Chang
On Sat 25 Jul 2009 12:33 +0300, Vitaliy Berdinskikh wrote: > В Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:42:47 +0100 > Laszlo Papp пишет: > > > Hello Vitaliy! > > > > Which packages do you speak about ? > > > > "Can I do it without new version of package1?" <- What do you mean > > under it ? > > The install-script

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Laszlo Papp

2009-07-31 Thread Loui Chang
I've been speaking to Laszlo over the past month and the impression that I get is that he really doesn't understand boundaries when it comes to communication. This can become extremely frustrating for the person he is talking to. When we first started talking, he asked me about many past TUs, and

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Laszlo Papp

2009-07-31 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri 31 Jul 2009 22:19 -0300, Douglas Soares de Andrade wrote: > > I admire Laszlo's enthusiasm, and respect his goals but I don't think he > > would be a good candidate for a Trusted User right now. > > You said all i think. I also admire his enthusiasm, but it is not the > time for him. > > I

[aur-general] AUR votes.

2009-08-02 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon 03 Aug 2009 10:08 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Something is strange with voting on the AUR lately. I put > gcc-snapshot in the AUR ages ago and it sat with only 1 or 2 votes > for months and then suddenly it had 50+ votes If you update a package, people tend to notice it on the front pa

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Laszlo Papp

2009-08-04 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun 02 Aug 2009 22:47 -0430, Angel Velásquez wrote: > First of all, I don't want point you about the case of the 'phantom' > votes and the 'phantom' accounts, so.. > > Loui can you give us more info about this? To make a real proof?, for > example date and hour of the creation of the account, l

Re: [aur-general] Please orphan AUR package "tao"

2009-08-04 Thread Loui Chang
On Tue 04 Aug 2009 15:43 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > Please orphan the AUR package "tao" since it has never been updated, the > user seems to have gotten inactive starting somewhere 2006 and the > PKGBUILD is lacking quality. Done.

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Laszlo Papp

2009-08-04 Thread Loui Chang
On Tue 04 Aug 2009 12:20 -0430, Angel Velásquez wrote: > And yes, I am relly impressed by how calmly he took that, an old > advisement of my country is 'who stay shut up is giving' (translate > advices sometimes can be senseless) but basicly means that a person > who don't dare to defend himself, i

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2009-08-04 Thread Loui Chang
On Tue 04 Aug 2009 23:55 +0200, mathieu p wrote: > I think that someone should remove the "archgdm" package, because : > -The project page (gnome look) is a 404 > -The package URL is also a 404 > -No email is given in the pkgbuild, so it isn't possible to know who made > the package, and with whic

Re: [aur-general] packages in community

2009-08-09 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon 10 Aug 2009 06:19 +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote: > vlad schrieb: > >hi all, > > > >are community repo packages going to be deleted from AUR? > >is the AUR comment interface still used for these packages > >or should one use only the bugtracker? > > > >thanks in advance, > >vlad > > > Hello, >

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2009-08-12 Thread Loui Chang
On Wed 12 Aug 2009 10:16 +0200, Clément DÉMOULINS wrote: > Hello, > > Please someone could delete my package networkmanager-openvpn-svn > replace by a git version. Done.

[aur-general] Community packages in the AUR have been disabled.

2009-08-23 Thread Loui Chang
Hey everyone. I've disabled all community packages in the AUR. There will still be a few artifacts remaining in the interface which will be taken care of in the next release of the AUR. Cheers!

Re: [aur-general] AUR package updating enhancements

2009-08-26 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu 27 Aug 2009 01:47 +0200, Arkham wrote: > > On 27/ago/09, at 01:35, Nélson «VuDu» Cunha wrote: > > >Sorry, but please don't try to make it sound like I said that because > >that's not an argument at all. > >Following what I said before, making steps harder isn't necessarily > >going to make

Re: [aur-general] AUR package updating enhancements

2009-08-27 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu 27 Aug 2009 19:20 +0200, Xyne wrote: > It's like suggesting to go to the beach and instead of someone > objecting with "I think it's too cold today... have you checked the > weather?" you get a 5 minute tirade about much it sucks to get sand in > your clothes, how swallowing seawater is bad

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2009-09-15 Thread Loui Chang
On Tue 15 Sep 2009 14:26 +0200, Jan-Erik Rediger wrote: > My ruby19-Package in the aur is now unnecessary because ruby 1.9 moved > to extra. > ruby19 in aur should be deleted: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23973 > There's another ruby v1.9 package: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2009-09-17 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon 14 Sep 2009 17:49 -0400, Tavian Barnes wrote: > The nouveau-drm-git package has been superseded by the > nouveau-drm-snapshot and kernel26-nouveau-git packages.  It would be > great if nouveau-drm-git could be removed to reduce confusion. Deleted.

Re: [aur-general] Please delete package "mumble-svn"

2009-09-18 Thread Loui Chang
On Sat 19 Sep 2009 05:46 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > Hey, > > please delete AUR package "mumble-svn" because the Mumble project has > since switched to GIT and the SVN is unmaintained. > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23369 > > -- Sven-Hendrik Deleted

Re: [aur-general] TU bylaws is not available

2009-09-19 Thread Loui Chang
On Sat 19 Sep 2009 15:24 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Laszlo Papp wrote: > >Hello! > > > >>From this site: > >http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines > >I can't reach tjis url: http://dev.archlinux.org/~simo/TUbylaws.html > >-> Object not found! Error 404 > >Do I do something

Re: [aur-general] TU bylaws is not available

2009-09-19 Thread Loui Chang
On Sat 19 Sep 2009 21:39 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Loui Chang wrote: > >On Sat 19 Sep 2009 15:24 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > >>Laszlo Papp wrote: > >>>Hello! > >>> > >>>>From this site: > >>>http://wiki.archlinux.org/in

Re: [aur-general] status of community-testing

2009-09-19 Thread Loui Chang
On Sat 19 Sep 2009 18:46 +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > Biru Ionut wrote: > >Firmicus wrote: > >>community-testing is currently still disabled: > >> > >>[franc...@sigurd ~]$ /arch/db-update community-testing > >>error: you shouldn't be updating community-testing on this server! > >> > >>Should i

Re: [aur-general] Status of the Chromium/Chrome packages on AUR

2009-09-26 Thread Loui Chang
On Sat 26 Sep 2009 17:03 +0300, Biru Ionut wrote: > On 09/26/2009 01:48 PM, Panos Filip wrote: > >Yeeeah, we have a new chromium PKGBUILD... > > > >http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30458 > > > >Each time somebody finds a way to improve the PKGBUILDs, instead of > >proposing the new PKGBUILD

Re: [aur-general] Packages removal

2009-09-27 Thread Loui Chang
On Wed 23 Sep 2009 20:04 +0600, Anton Bazhenov wrote: > twisted-web2 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25291 > Duplicate of "twisted-web2" package in Community. > > merkaartor-complete - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25595 > Duplicate of "merkaartor" package in AUR (with broken

<    1   2   3   4   5   >