Re: [aur-general] Upgraded AUR to 1.8.0

2011-02-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:02:48AM +0100, Cédric Girard wrote: > First congrats for all the improvements. This leads me to two questions: > > - It appears the "out of date" date is set to the same value for all > packages marked out of date. I assume this is the intended behavior as the > info was

[aur-general] Upgraded AUR to 1.8.0

2011-02-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
The official Arch Linux AUR setup has been upgraded to 1.8.0. For a short list of changes, read [1]. Please report any issues on the AUR bug tracker [2]. [1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2011-February/001433.html [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2

Re: [aur-general] AIDE out-of-date

2011-02-10 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:04:08PM +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 02/10/2011 07:01 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:55:05AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > >>I will email the maintainer and let him know that I will be moving it. I > >>will ge

Re: [aur-general] AIDE out-of-date

2011-02-10 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:55:05AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > I will email the maintainer and let him know that I will be moving it. I > will get to it tonight. You probably know that Ghost1227 is an Arch dev himself, don't you? :)

Re: [aur-general] How to handle installers in PKGBUILDs

2011-02-09 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 12:37:16PM +, Michael Schubert wrote: > I tried the following: > > $ cat CellDesigner-4.1-linux-installer.bin | tar -xzvf - > $ cat CellDesigner-4.1-linux-installer.bin | tar -xjvf - > $ cat CellDesigner-4.1-linux-installer.bin | tar -xJvf - > > each of which failed wi

[aur-general] Status of virtualbox_bin{, _beta, -1, -2, -3} and virtualbox-sun

2011-02-09 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Hey, folks! In consequence to recent deletion requests concerning the pre-built VirtualBox packages in the AUR, I decided that we should agree on what to do with them in consensus. The status quo is that the PUEL (Personal Use and Evaluation License) edition of VirtualBox is gone as of release 4.0

Re: [aur-general] Moving packages to Community

2011-02-05 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:45:20AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > Greg, You have a valid point, personally I have always asked the maintainer > of a package for objections before moving a package into community. I also > want to continue to express my deep gratitude for the packagers who > contribu

Re: [aur-general] [community], [unsupported] and AUR

2011-02-02 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 06:39:52AM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote: > Every binary repo is called something in square brackets like [core], > [extra], [community] etc., which are activated or deactivated > in /etc/pacman.conf, but there is no repo [unsupported]. And at least I > haven't found any referenc

Re: [aur-general] Delete Request

2011-02-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 02:57:52PM +0200, kevku wrote: > Req. removal of esteid-browser-plugin-hg-svn > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42553 > replaced with esteid-browser-plugin-svn > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45977 Done! :)

Re: [aur-general] Removal request (perl-poppler-datapatch-git)

2011-01-26 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:10:03AM +0100, Jakob Nixdorf wrote: > could someone please remove the package 'perl-poppler-datapatch-git' [1] > the patch i wrote was committed upstream, so it is not longer needed and > is fully replaced by 'perl-poppler-git' [2]. > > Thanks, > Jakob Nixdorf > > [1] h

Re: [aur-general] Proposal for the reinstatement of AUR Cleanup Day.

2011-01-25 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:14:39AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Lukas Fleischer > wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:43:20AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > > > I would also ask, is there a way to generate a list of packages that ha

Re: [aur-general] Proposal for the reinstatement of AUR Cleanup Day.

2011-01-25 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:43:20AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > I would also ask, is there a way to generate a list of packages that have > been flaged out of date for more than n days? Yes, there is. We did something similar during the last AUR cleanup (about three months ago iirc) to delete al

Re: [aur-general] delete request

2011-01-19 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:53:51PM -0500, jonathan wrote: > please delete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22403 as I am not > developing it, and it is redundant to pkgfile. Done, thanks!

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Seblu

2011-01-16 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:44:10PM +0100, Seblu wrote: > Yes great. I'm not paid by package i maintain. > Do not misunderstand my intentions, this package is more often used > without gtk (subjective). > It's a really useful package for debugging network issues and got it > in a server is a plus. >

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Seblu

2011-01-16 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:55:09PM +0100, Seblu wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 21:37 +0100, Seblu wrote: > >> [...] > >> arptables > >> awesome > >> conntrack-tools > >> ebtables > >> ferm > >> fstrim > >> lsscsi > >> mtr-cli > >> nload

Re: [aur-general] Is there a way to mark 300(!) AUR packages out-of-date?

2011-01-13 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:53:38PM +0100, Peter Simons wrote: > As you know, the 'arch-haskell' user on AUR owns some 1,990 packages. Since > our attention has shifted to HABS, those packages are no longer maintained. > We do try to keep some of them up-to-date when we have the chance, but it's > n

Re: [aur-general] Package review : gPlanarity

2011-01-13 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 05:53:08PM +0100, Sebastien Duthil wrote: > http://dl.free.fr/poeSUbf0M You don't need to include "cairo" and "freetype2" in the "depends" array as they are already satisfied by gtk2 or it's deps but except for that, it looks good to me :)

Re: [aur-general] Package review : gPlanarity

2011-01-13 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 05:46:43PM +0100, Sebastien Duthil wrote: > I'd like to submit this package to the AUR but, as it's my first > package, I'd like some reviews of the package before I send it. Sooo...? Where is it? :p

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request

2011-01-13 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 04:59:06PM +0100, speps wrote: > I have also sent him an e-mail without responses You added an AUR comment just two days ago. How long did you wait for a response to your mail? Two days are definitely too short and if the maintainer turned mail notifications off, he might h

Re: [aur-general] Community Cleanup 2011.

2011-01-11 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Adopted fcgiwrap and spawn-fcgi.

Re: [aur-general] tenshi

2011-01-02 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 11:23:31AM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote: > +1 leave it in the AUR. I also vote for leaving it in [unsupported] unless there is a good reason for moving it.

Re: [aur-general] orphan request

2010-12-29 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:40:29AM +0100, Marcin Karpezo wrote: > 0verkill package in AUR > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12753) needs to be fixed > due to lack of x86_64 support, but it seems that current maintainer > isn't interested in it (last update: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 11:54:05 > +00

Re: [aur-general] Arch holiday madness! nominations

2010-12-24 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 08:15:36PM -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > This is the official thread of the "Arch holiday madness!" nominations! > Please read the article located on rollingrelease.com or archlinux.org > before posting nominations here. Moved hsetroot and deadbeef to [community]. Merry

Re: [aur-general] Some packages moved from extra/community to aur

2010-12-12 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:13:46PM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:56:20AM +0100, Michael Trunner wrote: > > * tcsh > > * autofs > > * python-numarray > > Moved to [community-testing] as I didn't have the chance to do any > testing y

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2010-12-08 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:28:49PM +0100, Philipp wrote: > perl-file-copy-link > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38801 > > perl-graph > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38802 > > perl-io > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14631 > > perl-text > https://aur.archlinux.or

Re: [aur-general] Some packages moved from extra/community to aur

2010-12-07 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:56:20AM +0100, Michael Trunner wrote: > * tcsh > * autofs > * python-numarray Moved to [community-testing] as I didn't have the chance to do any testing yet. If everything works as expected, I'll move them to [community] soon. Cheers!

Re: [aur-general] Some packages moved from extra/community to aur

2010-12-07 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:01:39PM +0100, Michael Trunner wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:56:20AM +0100, Michael Trunner wrote: > > > we use Archlinux on our university. The following packages where in > > > extra/community the last time we reinstalled our student pool and now in > > > AUR: >

Re: [aur-general] Some packages moved from extra/community to aur

2010-12-07 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:56:20AM +0100, Michael Trunner wrote: > we use Archlinux on our university. The following packages where in > extra/community the last time we reinstalled our student pool and now in AUR: > > * tcsh > * autofs > * python-numarray > > Is it possible to move it back to co

Re: [aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar

2010-12-02 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:06:25AM +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > Ranguvar has been added in our team no more than last year. > > Conform bylaws a motion should be sent and two active TUs and a > voting procedure should follow after 7 days of discussion. > > Here are my reasons: > > 1) i noticed in

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Dave Reisner

2010-11-29 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:01:04PM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote: > Greetings! > > Please consider this my application to become a Trusted User. My name is > Dave Reisner, and I'm 27 years old, currently residing in the New York > City area. Ionut Biru has graciously offered to sponsor this > applicat

Re: [aur-general] About BURG packages

2010-11-24 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 07:43:43PM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Are AUR package submitters considered to read the forums? Even I don't > have a FluxBB account and I never read any forum postings (except once > or twice when someone sent me a link). s/considered/supposed/ :)

Re: [aur-general] About BURG packages

2010-11-24 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 06:19:37PM +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote: > basically Lukas is right with this procedure. But in this case there is a > forum thread since June in which the author of burg-bzr did not take part. > For me that is reason enough to think that he or she is gone. So I orphaned >

Re: [aur-general] About BURG packages

2010-11-24 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 02:37:52PM +0200, H.Gökhan SARI wrote: > Main burg package (which is burg-bzr, > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33382) is not orphaned and not > updated since July 16, although package is flagged as out-of-date and a > better PKGBUILD is suggested in comments. And

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request

2010-11-22 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 05:22:07PM -0300, Frikilinux wrote: > Could you orphan this package : > > regnum-online http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30621 Done. Merci :)

Re: [aur-general] orphan request

2010-11-22 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 08:35:11AM +0100, jib wrote: > Could you please orphan the following package: > > humanity-icons (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30460) > > The maintainer doesn't correct a faulty PKGBUILD; comments have been > posted, an email has been sent without a reply. > Th

Re: [aur-general] AUR helpers in [community]?

2010-11-18 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:28:31PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote: > > I basically agree. The AUR is unsupported and has nothing to do with > > Arch Linux or the [community] repository. > > Since when doesn't have AUR anything to do with Arch Linux or > [community] repo? AUR is totally Arch Linux relate

Re: [aur-general] AUR helpers in [community]?

2010-11-18 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 04:43:15AM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote: > So, IMO, it is best that such tools, regardless of the extent of > features, be left in AUR. I myself use slurpy for upload, and rarely > do I use the search/download features :) I basically agree. The AUR is unsupported and has nothing

Re: [aur-general] Does anyone maintain ImgToPs?

2010-11-18 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:17:38PM -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote: > I am going to maintain imgtops (http://imgtops.sourceforge.net/), which > is a graphic format conversion tool, useful to make large *.{eps,jpg,...} > files > intended for inclusion into LaTeX fit the http://arXiv.org standards.

Re: [aur-general] zint qt optional dep

2010-11-18 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:40:38PM +, Joao Cordeiro wrote: > Zint checks for qt and installs both zint and zint-qt if it is found. > Otherwise, it just installs zint. I don't believe this to be the optimal > approach. Even if I have qt installed, it doesn't necessarily means that I > want zint-

Re: [aur-general] AUR Improvement Thread

2010-11-17 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:17:33PM -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote: > 1. Integrated distributed version control system Why would we need that? Keep it simple. People can setup their own repos if they want, just as I did [1]. > 2. User provided binaries (if case anyone wants to volunteer) (this should >

Re: [aur-general] delete packages

2010-11-16 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:13:14AM +, Joao Cordeiro wrote: > starcal-new (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32486) > starcal-last (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35941) > The user was creating a new package every time a new version came out. Since > the original starcal was orp

Re: [aur-general] Remove pks

2010-11-14 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 07:31:19PM +0200, jesse jaara wrote: > they are provided by lib32-mesa-git Agreed and deleted.

Re: [aur-general] Remove pks

2010-11-14 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 07:05:43PM +0200, jesse jaara wrote: > These packages can be removed > lib32-ati-dri-git > lib32-libgl-git Why?

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request

2010-11-14 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 02:07:58PM +0100, Clément Démoulins wrote: > Could you orphan the packages : > - python-yenc [http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7743] > - tvnamer-git [http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36535] > > The maintainers doesn't update after the migration to python

Re: [aur-general] graphviz perl module package

2010-11-13 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 06:06:13PM +0100, Florian Pritz wrote: > You should: > - move everything after make into package() > - remove || return 1 > - replace $startdir/{pkg,src} by ${pkg,src}dir > - remove the 3rd line (useless comment) > > That should look similar to this http://paste.xinu.at

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2010-11-12 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 06:56:32PM +0100, Xavier D. wrote: > Could you delete this package: notify-osd-xfce-bzr > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31872) as its orphan, > redundant with notify-osd-xfconf-bzr > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31934) and not working > anymore. Don

Re: [aur-general] determining inverse AUR dependencies of binary packages

2010-11-10 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:05:42PM +, Christopher Brannon wrote: > I notice that python-sqlalchemy is about to change in [community]. > Most of the packages which depend on it will need to change their > dependency to python2-sqlalchemy. This is handled quite nicely for > packages in the binar

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

2010-11-06 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 10:26:40PM +0100, widomaker...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > please delete cid-svn and tvdownloader-svn > > # cid-svn > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40062 > remplace by > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42696 > > # tvdownloader*svn > [3] http://a

Re: [aur-general] Remove old TOMOYO Packages

2010-10-30 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:08:12PM +0200, Stefan J. Betz wrote: > ccs-tools -> Thu, 12 Nov 2009 -> Only useful for old patched kernels > kernel26-tomoyo -> Thu, 12 Nov 2009 -> 2.6.31.* is real old, TOMOYO 2.* is >already in upstream kernels! > nvidia-tomoyo -

Re: [aur-general] aur website default ssl

2010-10-30 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 08:47:59AM -0700, Justin Davis wrote: > If the password is used in more than one place and sniffed out, then > not only is the user's AUR account compromised but also other accounts > on other websites. It is easier to run a sniffing program that are > already setup to searc

Re: [aur-general] aur website default ssl

2010-10-30 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 02:30:58PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > Now that you say maintainers, I wonder how the system works for TUs, > since they do upload binary packages. Is there a single sign-on or > something like this? We upload packages using devtools and SSH (scp(1)) - the same way t

Re: [aur-general] deletion request: kernel26-systemd

2010-10-28 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 04:16:07PM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > Please delete the kernel26-systemd package. It set some flags that are > no longer necessary with Arch's 2.6.36 build. Deleted, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

2010-10-26 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:33:51AM -0400, Kaiting Chen wrote: > I currently maintain thirty packages in the AUR, most of which I do not use > but would be unhappy in seeing them orphaned. Could you please add a link to your AUR packages? :) > I would also like to work on maintain the Arch web pre

Re: [aur-general] deletion request

2010-10-26 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:26:50AM -0300, Gonzalo Seguel wrote: > *qgtkstyle-svn* > *reason: qgtk now is part of kde, and this svn don't be moved anymore* > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16964 Deleted. > yapos > this proyect is down, the script is obsolete > http://aur.archlinux.org/pa

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request: portmidi

2010-10-26 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 01:55:02PM +0200, SpepS wrote: > After a week, still no risponse. > Maybe it's time to orphan it. I'll move portmidi to [community] today or tomorrow anyway, so there's actually not much need to orphan it. Anyways, I quickly uploaded a fixed source package heavily based on

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

2010-10-26 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 02:31:47PM +0100, Simon Stoakley wrote: > Could you please delete psearch-python3 [1] it's a dup of psearch > [2], and not fixed for python3. psearch-python3 contains an additional patch (actually patching is done via sed(1)) that psearch doesn't seem to provide. I think we

Re: [aur-general] pkgstats and unused [community] packages

2010-10-26 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 03:46:56AM -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote: > If it hasn't been done, someone needs to check to make sure that they > are not {make,opt}depends of other non-orphaned packages. Done. ucl is a makedepend of upx, gpsmanshp an optdep of gpsman. That's it :)

Re: [aur-general] Assigning Numbers to User and Group

2010-10-13 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 04:07:38PM -0700, Steve Holmes wrote: > Anyway, I don't know how numeric IDs are assigned to users and groups > - especially those intended to be used by system daemons like mysql or > postgreql. I have postgresql on my box and it does this same kind of > thing with user an

Re: [aur-general] ttf-ubuntu

2010-10-13 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 02:02:18PM +0200, Massimiliano Torromeo wrote: > I adopted [3] recently (updated and cleaned-up the PKGBUILD), and > would like to add that [1] and [2] indicate the wrong licence. > The fonts are released under the Ubuntu Font Licence, not GPL. Agreed, but this can be chang

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Lukas Fleischer

2010-10-11 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 08:35:18AM +0200, Pierre Chapuis wrote: > > optionally surf > > How would you deal with config.h? To me surf should stay in AUR because of > that. It's still quite easy to build custom packages that are in [community], e.g. using the ABS [1]. You could use something like

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Lukas Fleischer

2010-10-10 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 05:58:07PM -0700, Brad Fanella wrote: > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines > "Only 'popular' packages may enter the repo, as defined by 1% usage from > pkgstats or 10 votes on the AUR." > > :-) > > I don't think that holds true for dependencie

[aur-general] TU Application: Lukas Fleischer

2010-10-10 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Hi! My name is Lukas Fleischer, I'm a 20-year-old student from Germany, studying Computer Science at the University of Stuttgart, freelance web-developper, IT consultant and hobbyist DJ. I've been using GNU/Linux for about three years (used OpenBSD and FreeBSD before) and Arch Linux pr

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning request

2010-10-07 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 03:14:09PM +0200, widomaker...@gmail.com wrote: > please orphan portmidi since those are outdated for a long time (03 > Sep 2009) but don't get updated. Did you already send a mail to the maintainer asking him to update the package and/or orphan it? :)

Re: [aur-general] Delete request steelstorm-beta

2010-10-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:43:02PM +0200, widomaker...@gmail.com wrote: > I stand still, but I think the game files (beta) will be deleted > from their servers soon. I see. If there will be no future beta releases, this should in fact be removed.

Re: [aur-general] Delete request steelstorm-beta

2010-10-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:23:07PM +0200, widomaker...@gmail.com wrote: > please, can you delete steelstorm-beta > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40716), remplace by > steelstorm (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41363) a > release is out. Is there any reason to delete a package

Re: [aur-general] Removal request (aurdupes output 2010-09-15)

2010-09-19 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 02:20:13PM +0200, Jakob Gruber wrote: > I've also played around with automated AUR quality checks on dumps of the SQL > DB. Looking at things like 'flagged out of date' and 'date of last action on > package', I initially came up with around 500-1000 packages that should be

Re: [aur-general] Removal request (aurdupes output 2010-09-15)

2010-09-18 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:22:52PM -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote: > It's definitely got some margin for error. What does the dupes script > check? pkgname? Yep, it checks for duplicate package names in the official repos and the AUR, see [1]. It'll output duplicate package names and, optionally, AUR

Re: [aur-general] Removal request (aurdupes output 2010-09-15)

2010-09-18 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:04:09PM -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote: > Done Btw, can we automate this in some way? Is there any TU running aurdupes regularly? Or should I just continue sending removal requests every week or so...?

[aur-general] Removal request (aurdupes output 2010-09-15)

2010-09-18 Thread Lukas Fleischer
aurdupes marked following packages as [extra]/[community]/AUR duplicates. Three of them even have removal requests in the comments section: - flowcanvas: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40919 - patchage: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37321 - qrencode: http://aur.archlinux.org/p

[aur-general] Removal request (bin32-skype)

2010-09-17 Thread Lukas Fleischer
I guess this [1] can be removed as well as skype has been in [multilib] for a while now... [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7914

Re: [aur-general] AUR/[extra]/[community] duplicates

2010-09-16 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 08:16:16PM -0500, member kittykatt wrote: > Installed and working like a charm. Thanks for the contribution. I'll put > this in my cron.weekly. :D You can now even use `aurdupes --show-links` or `aurdupes -l` to make aurdupes output an AUR link for every AUR dupe. Just thou

Re: [aur-general] AUR/[extra]/[community] duplicates

2010-09-16 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 07:47:54PM -0500, member kittykatt wrote: > Duh! I knew that. Thanks. Now there's aurdupes [1]. So you can just build and install it and use `aurdupes core extra community` to display all dupes in [core], [extra], [community] and the AUR :) [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/pac

Re: [aur-general] AUR/[extra]/[community] duplicates

2010-09-16 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 07:00:12PM -0500, member kittykatt wrote: > Remember that this will fail to find real duplicates if you're using testing > and community-testing. What I did was make a new config with all custom > servers, testing, and community-testing commented out and just supplied the >

Re: [aur-general] AUR/[extra]/[community] duplicates

2010-09-16 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 09:33:26PM +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote: > I removed all of the mentioned PKGBUILDS. Regardless if they are written > differently or are even better than the ones in the repos: The AUR is not > the place for packages equally named with packages in the repos. Those are dupl

Re: [aur-general] AUR/[extra]/[community] duplicates

2010-09-16 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 09:33:26PM +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote: > thank you for your very long list. Can you provide your script somewhere, > maybe in AUR? Well, it's actually two scripts: First, I used "aurpkglist.pl" [1] to query the AUR web interface and create a list of all AUR packages (I wis

[aur-general] AUR/[extra]/[community] duplicates

2010-09-16 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Hi, Just wrote a small script to check for duplicate package names in the AUR and the official repos and created a list of duplicates. For each of the packages I quickly checked AUR and [extra]/[community] package versions, AUR comments and whether there seem to be some additional patches in the A

[aur-general] Removal request (dmenu-vertical, dmenu-vertical-xft)

2010-07-18 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Hi, please remove dmenu-vertical [1] and dmenu-vertical-xft [2] since dmenu supports vertical list mode out of the box since the last release (about one month ago, just check the package's latest comments). [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20063 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.p

Re: [aur-general] AUR-notify suggestions

2010-06-24 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:03:52AM +0100, Peter Lewis wrote: > 1) It could say in the email (preferably the subject) if I was the person who > uploaded / am currently maintaining that package. What would that be useful for? To put those mails in different mail boxes? I currently keep a list with

Re: [aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-30 Thread Lukas Fleischer
comment. As every line of the "backup" array contains a pound sign, the closing bracket of the "backup" array is actually never reached. I opened a ticket concerning this issue: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17328 Best regards, Lukas Fleischer

[aur-general] Orphaning request (pidgin-hotkeys)

2009-11-29 Thread Lukas Fleischer
package, so that I can adopt it and upload a working PKGBUILD? Best regards, Lukas Fleischer

<    1   2   3   4   5