On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 03:49:10 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
>
> >Even if it weren't entirely up to the maintainer to pin comments, who
> >are you proposing should be responsible for determining what packages
> >should come with warn
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 13:25:09 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng via aur-general wrote:
> >This is the primary question here. If it's the maintainer then... what
> >is this email thread even for?
>
> It's about sense of respons
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Eli Schwartz
wrote:
> On 11/13/2017 09:35 AM, Michael Kogan wrote:
> > @1) Sorry, I am using the GMail web interface and forgot that it is
> quoting
> > previous mails automatically.
>
> I feel so sorry for you! :D I hope you have the opportunity to get back
> to
Third-party non-involved user chiming in, but I do not think any sort of
tenure/seniority requirement as mentioned in the final point below would be
a good idea. Something based on recent activity would be better.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:38 AM Bruno Pagani via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux
Latest post, the only one by this account -
https://aur.archlinux.org/account/RonaldSteele - post unrelated to other
comments on cntlm and links to dodgy blog.
Account just registered today. Surprised there's only one post so far.
Exactly the same comment has been repeated, this time by user
https://aur.archlinux.org/account/KennethMicha
Seems very targetted, and I wonder why that would be.
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:16 AM Robin Broda via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 5/2/19 10:11 PM, Oon-
I've been using cin-git for a while (which draws on cinelerra-gg project).
For those who are unfamiliar, there's the 'original' (old and out-of-date)
cinelerra, and a newer cinelerra-heroine, and the most popular one is
cinelerra-gg.
The 'cin-bin' PKGBUILD on AUR points to the original website, an
