I've been using cin-git for a while (which draws on cinelerra-gg project).
For those who are unfamiliar, there's the 'original' (old and out-of-date)
cinelerra, and a newer cinelerra-heroine, and the most popular one is
cinelerra-gg.
The 'cin-bin' PKGBUILD on AUR points to the original website, an
Exactly the same comment has been repeated, this time by user
https://aur.archlinux.org/account/KennethMicha
Seems very targetted, and I wonder why that would be.
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:16 AM Robin Broda via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 5/2/19 10:11 PM, Oon-
Latest post, the only one by this account -
https://aur.archlinux.org/account/RonaldSteele - post unrelated to other
comments on cntlm and links to dodgy blog.
Account just registered today. Surprised there's only one post so far.
Third-party non-involved user chiming in, but I do not think any sort of
tenure/seniority requirement as mentioned in the final point below would be
a good idea. Something based on recent activity would be better.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:38 AM Bruno Pagani via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Eli Schwartz
wrote:
> On 11/13/2017 09:35 AM, Michael Kogan wrote:
> > @1) Sorry, I am using the GMail web interface and forgot that it is
> quoting
> > previous mails automatically.
>
> I feel so sorry for you! :D I hope you have the opportunity to get back
> to
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 13:25:09 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng via aur-general wrote:
> >This is the primary question here. If it's the maintainer then... what
> >is this email thread even for?
>
> It's about sense of respons
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 03:49:10 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
>
> >Even if it weren't entirely up to the maintainer to pin comments, who
> >are you proposing should be responsible for determining what packages
> >should come with warn