El may 28, 2014 1:31 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski b...@bpiotrowski.pl
escribió:
On Sun, 25 May 2014 12:57:43 +0200
SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't really understand the difference between
El may 28, 2014 4:47 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski b...@bpiotrowski.pl
escribió:
On Wed, 28 May 2014 16:19:16 -0500
Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia palop...@gmail.com wrote:
El may 28, 2014 1:31 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski b...@bpiotrowski.pl
escribió:
On Sun, 25 May 2014 12:57:43 +0200
El may 28, 2014 6:50 PM, Justin Dray jus...@dray.be escribió:
I thought he was being sarcastic, and was implying that we should delete
it, because what is the point of saving a couple MB on removing a small
portion of a font at the expense of more packages to maintain.
I am dead serious;
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Alan Jenkins
alan.james.jenk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Zack,
Good call, I managed to get aur/xen to install by doing that on my Arch
x86_64 PC. However still doesnt generate the files in boot on Arch 686 =/.
Thanks,
Alan
On 16 May 2014 02:00, Zack Buhman
Not in the comments but in a direct mail to you. But yet. I agree, and
suggested, the merge.
Cheers,
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Stefan Husmann
stefan-husm...@t-online.dewrote:
Hello,
there are two packages in AUR which give bascally the same, le[1] and
le-editor[2].
le is difficult
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, April 20, 2014 12:52:18 Stefan Husmann wrote:
Hello,
there are two packages in AUR which give bascally the same, le[1] and
le-editor[2].
le is difficult to find, so please merge le into le-editor. The
Please merge ee https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ee/ into ee-editor
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ee-editor/.
--
http://about.me/palopezv
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Allen Choong allen...@hotmail.com wrote:
For your information. The name cndrvcups-lb is used in the README file. The
name is also used in Gentoo.
That's not an answer; I'm afraid you miss the point. I won't discuss
the reasons further as I have already given my
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Allen Choong allen...@hotmail.com wrote:
The name is the result after discussion with the maintainer of cndrvcups-lb.
Clarity trumps brevity everytime. I am sometimes tempted to rename one
package I maintain (the ee editor), just for that one reason.
As an end
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia
I rather ask the other maintainer to rename his package, not renaming
yours in that incredibly cryptic and convoluted way. He may feel he is
entitles having arrived first but when you do a publish a public work,
your first duty
Hi,
the author of the uemacs-git package is unreachable (non-existing domain)
and his last signal of life was almost two years ago. I would like to take
over maintainership. I already have a replacement PKGBUILD.
--
P. A. López-Valencia
http://about.me/palopezv
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia
palop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
the author of the uemacs-git package is unreachable (non-existing domain)
and his last signal of life was almost two years ago. I would like to take
over maintainership. I already have
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 10:52 -0500, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia
palop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
the author of the uemacs-git package
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:05:54 -0400
From: teitelmane...@gmail.com
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: [aur-general] Merge request for [sqlmap].
Please merge sqlmap[1] into sqlmap-git[2]. I contacted the sqlmap-git
maintainer, who agreed to a merge.
The sqlmap sourceforge upstream
El mié, 09-10-2013 a las 17:17 -0300, Lara Maia escribió:
I try to help keep some packages useful for me and for the community,
but if bad
maintainers are maintaining packages, do not see why this difficulty about
getting a package. This discourages me.
Probably you are feeling down and even
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock
bidul...@openss7.org wrote:
If you look at https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html
you will see that 3.2.x is LTS with EOL 2016, whereas 3.10.x
is EOL Sept, 2015. (Obviously 3.0.x is EOL Oct 2013, next
month, so some change is
El mar, 17-09-2013 a las 06:09 -0700, Anatol Pomozov escribió:
I would suggest to rename linux-lts to linux-lts-3.2 and keep it in
the repo for a while. This is the way how Arch can keep old version of
the package.
This sounds reasonable, but see below.
So people who does not want to rush
El ago 18, 2013 4:37 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos artafi...@gmail.com
escribió:
Try the irc channel until he's back
I would not. Stick to the forums. The level of noise to content ratio in
the irc channel is unsufferable most of the time. It is a frat house.
Noone enforces focus there, although
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
It's dead, that's what's wrong with it. [0] is down, both feeds and
tweets empty in [1].
[0] http://gitweb.compiz.org/
[1] http://www.compiz.org/
Not quite dead yet. You are just not looking the right place[a] where
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia
palop...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
It's dead, that's what's wrong with it. [0] is down, both feeds and
tweets empty in [1].
[0] http://gitweb.compiz.org/
[1
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Stefano berg...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that mod is more properly, because a part of LO will disapper
and after an update of LO we need to reinstall the theme package.
If you think anyway this name is wrong I'm open to do the right way.
Not at all, I am
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Stefano berg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I made a name mistake and I propose to merge [1] in [2]:
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libreoffice-kalahari/
IN
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libreoffice-kalahari-mod/
Wouldn't be more
On vie, 5 de jul 2013 a las 1:34 PM, Maxime GAUDUIN aluc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:22 PM, SJ_UnderWater webmaster0...@rcn.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia
palop...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/7/3 Xorg xorgbrea...@gmail.com
I
On vie, 5 de jul 2013 a las 3:59 PM, Karol Blazewicz
karol.blazew...@gmail.com wrote:
See
https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-June/023942.html
Felix Yan
As Nightingale is just a forked version, I don't feel the need -
people could choose whatever they want on AUR.
2013/7/3 Xorg xorgbrea...@gmail.com
Hi everybody.
Developers don't use svn today (I have downloaded source from svn, we can see
2010-09-18 v1.0 r344 the latest date in ChangeLog).
So, only libkqueue0 appears to be good.
I suggest to merge libkqueue and libkqueue-svn into libkqueue0,
25 matches
Mail list logo
