Re: [aur-general] ttf-droid-sans duplicate of community/ttf-droid?

El may 28, 2014 6:50 PM, "Justin Dray" escribió: > > I thought he was being sarcastic, and was implying that we should delete > it, because what is the point of saving a couple MB on removing a small > portion of a font at the expense of more packages to maintain. I am dead serious; that's what s

Re: [aur-general] ttf-droid-sans duplicate of community/ttf-droid?

El may 28, 2014 4:47 PM, "Bartłomiej Piotrowski" escribió: > > On Wed, 28 May 2014 16:19:16 -0500 > Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia wrote: > > El may 28, 2014 1:31 PM, "Bartłomiej Piotrowski" > > escribió: > > > > > > On Sun, 25 May 201

Re: [aur-general] ttf-droid-sans duplicate of community/ttf-droid?

El may 28, 2014 1:31 PM, "Bartłomiej Piotrowski" escribió: > > On Sun, 25 May 2014 12:57:43 +0200 > SanskritFritz wrote: > > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Jerome Leclanche > > wrote: > > > I don't really understand the difference between community/ttf-droid > > > and any of these: > > > https

Re: [aur-general] Anyone got Xen working?

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Alan Jenkins wrote: > Hey Zack, > > Good call, I managed to get aur/xen to install by doing that on my Arch > x86_64 PC. However still doesnt generate the files in boot on Arch 686 =/. > > Thanks, > > Alan > > > On 16 May 2014 02:00, Zack Buhman wrote: > >> On Fri

Re: [aur-general] Merge request le-editor

On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Felix Yan wrote: > On Sunday, April 20, 2014 12:52:18 Stefan Husmann wrote: > > Hello, > > > > there are two packages in AUR which give bascally the same, "le"[1] and > > "le-editor"[2]. > > > > "le" is difficult to find, so please merge "le" into "le-editor". The

Re: [aur-general] Merge request le-editor

Not in the comments but in a direct mail to you. But yet. I agree, and suggested, the merge. Cheers, On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Hello, > > there are two packages in AUR which give bascally the same, "le"[1] and > "le-editor"[2]. > > "le" is difficult to find, so pl

[aur-general] Merge request

Please merge ee into ee-editor < https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ee-editor/>. -- http://about.me/palopezv

Re: [aur-general] Request for replacing canon-ufr to cndrvcups-lb-bin

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Allen Choong wrote: > For your information. The name cndrvcups-lb is used in the README file. The > name is also used in Gentoo. > That's not an answer; I'm afraid you miss the point. I won't discuss the reasons further as I have already given my opinion. But I re

Re: [aur-general] Request for replacing canon-ufr to cndrvcups-lb-bin

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia > > I rather ask the other maintainer to rename his package, not renaming > yours in that incredibly cryptic and convoluted way. He may feel he is > entitles having arrived first but when you do a publish a public work,

Re: [aur-general] Request for replacing canon-ufr to cndrvcups-lb-bin

On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Allen Choong wrote: > The name is the result after discussion with the maintainer of cndrvcups-lb. > Clarity trumps brevity everytime. I am sometimes tempted to rename one package I maintain (the ee editor), just for that one reason. As an end luser and consumer,

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning request: uemacs-git

On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Maxime Gauduin wrote: > On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 10:52 -0500, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia < > > palop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > >

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning request: uemacs-git

On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia < palop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > the author of the uemacs-git package is unreachable (non-existing domain) > and his last signal of life was almost two years ago. I would like to take > over maintainers

[aur-general] Orphaning request: uemacs-git

Hi, the author of the uemacs-git package is unreachable (non-existing domain) and his last signal of life was almost two years ago. I would like to take over maintainership. I already have a replacement PKGBUILD. -- P. A. López-Valencia http://about.me/palopezv

Re: [aur-general] Merge request for [sqlmap].

> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:05:54 -0400 > From: teitelmane...@gmail.com > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Subject: [aur-general] Merge request for [sqlmap]. > > Please merge sqlmap[1] into sqlmap-git[2]. I contacted the sqlmap-git > maintainer, who agreed to a merge. > > The sqlmap sourceforge

Re: [aur-general] disown fortune-mod-br

El mié, 09-10-2013 a las 17:17 -0300, Lara Maia escribió: > I try to help keep some packages useful for me and for the community, > but if bad > maintainers are maintaining packages, do not see why this difficulty about > getting a package. This discourages me. Probably you are feeling down and ev

Re: [aur-general] LTS kernel moved to 3.10.x - module rebuilds

El mar, 17-09-2013 a las 06:09 -0700, Anatol Pomozov escribió: > I would suggest to rename linux-lts to linux-lts-3.2 and keep it in > the repo for a while. This is the way how Arch can keep old version of > the package. This sounds reasonable, but see below. > So people who does not want to rus

Re: [aur-general] LTS kernel moved to 3.10.x - module rebuilds

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > If you look at https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html > you will see that 3.2.x is LTS with EOL 2016, whereas 3.10.x > is EOL Sept, 2015. (Obviously 3.0.x is EOL Oct 2013, next > month, so some change is necessary.) > When we

Re: [aur-general] [100% off-topic] What happened to the arch general mailing list?

El ago 18, 2013 4:37 AM, "Leonidas Spyropoulos" escribió: > > Try the irc channel until he's back I would not. Stick to the forums. The level of noise to content ratio in the irc channel is unsufferable most of the time. It is a frat house. Noone enforces focus there, although there is an offto

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: torrenstream

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Jonas Heinrich wrote: > Hello, > please remove AUR package "torrentstream" [1] since it's deprecated and > replaced by the program acestream [2]. > Thank you, > Jonas > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/torrentstream/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/package

Re: [aur-general] Status of Compiz on AUR

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia < palop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Martti Kühne wrote: > >> >> It's dead, that's what's wrong with it. [0] is down, both feeds and >> tweets empt

Re: [aur-general] Status of Compiz on AUR

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Martti Kühne wrote: > > It's dead, that's what's wrong with it. [0] is down, both feeds and > tweets empty in [1]. > > [0] http://gitweb.compiz.org/ > [1] http://www.compiz.org/ > Not quite dead yet. You are just not looking the right place[a] where the code is h

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Stefano wrote: > > I think that mod is more properly, because a part of LO will disapper > and after an update of LO we need to reinstall the theme package. > > If you think anyway this name is wrong I'm open to do the right way. > Not at all, I am not set on my

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Stefano wrote: > Hi everyone, > I made a name mistake and I propose to merge [1] in [2]: > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libreoffice-kalahari/ > IN > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libreoffice-kalahari-mod/ Wouldn't be more appropriate to call

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: Songbird

On vie, 5 de jul 2013 a las 3:59 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: See https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-June/023942.html Felix Yan As Nightingale is just a forked version, I don't feel the need - people could choose whatever they want on AUR. (And songbird-bin still ha

Re: [aur-general] Merge/Remove Request : libkqueue

On vie, 5 de jul 2013 a las 1:34 PM, Maxime GAUDUIN wrote: On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:22 PM, SJ_UnderWater wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia < palop...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2013/7/3 Xorg > > I will disown libkqueue in 2 weeks t

Re: [aur-general] Merge/Remove Request : libkqueue

2013/7/3 Xorg > > Hi everybody. > > > Developers don't use svn today (I have downloaded source from svn, we can see > 2010-09-18 v1.0 r344 the latest date in ChangeLog). > > So, only libkqueue0 appears to be good. > I suggest to merge libkqueue and libkqueue-svn into libkqueue0, and then > ren