Hi all,
I had hoped it wouldn't come to this, but based on mounting evidence,
I've come to the conclusion that I should resign as a TU. Most of you
probably already forgot I was here, and I'm sorry that I just haven't
been able to keep on top of things and participate lately.
A lot has happened
On Mon, 04 Aug 2014, Thorsten Töpper wrote:
well with all this you mention here it doesn't sound too bad so have
fun and I hope you enjoy it. :-)
Thanks, Thorsten. All is indeed well :-)
Pete.
Hi all,
I'm going to be inactive for a bit, I'm afraid. I'm travelling for work this
week, and then moving house. Not sure how quickly I'll get Internet set up at
the new place.
If anyone could update choqok, then that would be great - it should be a
straightforward version bump. I'm not aware
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012, Simon Legner wrote:
the packages gill-sans-font and ttf-gill-sans provide the same font. It
would make sense to delete one.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9843
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18570
Merged. Thanks for the reminder, I meant to do
On Friday 02 Mar 2012 13:03:47 Thomas Bächler wrote:
I always highlight that the Arch core developers usually don't interfere
with the affairs of the TU group. In that sense, the bylaws make sense
by saying you need to TU to sponsor him. However, the important part
(voting) is done by TUs
On Wednesday 29 Feb 2012 20:26:37 Cédric Girard wrote:
I have not contacted him but he is in cc of this email.
I presume you mean bcc? Either that, or you forgot to add his address to the
cc.
Just checking :-)
Pete.
Hi Ike,
Thanks for applying :-)
On Thursday 01 Mar 2012 08:33:17 Ike Devolder wrote:
Currently I'm using Archlinux as my primary operating system for over 6
years and for several years I'm maintaining a small number of packages in
AUR[1]. I also keep a repository with arch packages for
On Thursday 01 Mar 2012 07:51:47 Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
This is a bit picky of me, but technically the sponsor is supposed to be a
TU and as far as I can tell Stéphane is a dev rather than a TU...
So ... Following this logic I have the power to break everything on your
system ... but
On Thursday 01 Mar 2012 23:35:16 Heiko Baums wrote:
4. AUR is meant for providing PKGBUILDs for other users, so that they
don't need to do the same work again (writing the PKGBUILDs). Since
e.g. indicator-messages can't be installed by other users - at least
not with yaourt
Sounds like you
On Saturday 25 Feb 2012 13:43:39 Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
I have released ruby 1.9.3_p125 into [extra].
Great work, Thomas.
As a result of the above change, all ruby gem packages will have to
add a --no-user-install flag when running gem in the PKGBUILD.
Aaahh, ha haa.. I hadn't quite realised
On Monday 20 Feb 2012 09:47:12 Mark Foxwell wrote:
Please delete my package lirc-utils-git [1] as this was only created as
a quick fix for a compile error and is no longer needed.
Alternatively, if anyone thinks this package is of any use, I will just
disown.
If it works, IMO it might be
On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 15:21:57 Dimitri Semitsoglou-Tsiapos wrote:
Package testtesrdfdfdfa script src=//bit.ly/xN4HZd-2/* [1] appears
to exist for the sole purpose of attempting cross-site scripting.
Deleted. Thanks for flagging this up.
Pete.
On Monday 13 Feb 2012 19:03:55 Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
If you plan on adopting sage-mathematics, you should know that it is
currently unbuildable on archlinux, and some other newer distros due
to how it is built.
It is currently out of date, and you wont be able to update it without
On Thursday 02 Feb 2012 12:46:21 Moritz Rudert wrote:
I would like to the python-packages, but, like Christoph, I am not a TU
yet and don't know how I become one?
Is that a question or a statement? ;-)
It's all in the TU byelaws:
http://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html
Cheers,
On Friday 13 Jan 2012 02:12:31 David Rawson Couzelis wrote:
Please delete the enbudget AUR package.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47010
The application has been renamed divvyup. A new AUR package has been
created with the new name. I am both the maintainer of the AUR package
Hi,
On Friday 13 Jan 2012 03:01:52 Ernie Brodeur wrote:
The package charles-3.6.3-1 has been flagged out of date since nov 30th.
I would like to adopt it, is it possible to get it disowned?
Please send an email to the maintainer first, asking them to update it, or if
you can take over. If
Hi Pablo,
On Wednesday 11 Jan 2012 20:56:03 Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C. wrote:
Well... this isn't new really... until a couple of weeks ago (prolly
less) there were an outdated version. I tried to communicate with the
maintainer, but he never answered. Now I found that the package
doesn't
On Friday 23 Dec 2011 14:41:09 Karol Blazewicz wrote:
Was dropboxd-userspace just removed or merged with dropbox-daemon?
Peter Lewis asked [1] does merging also transfer the notify list? so
to test this I subscribed to dropboxd-userspace but not to
dropbox-daemon. Now the former package
On Wednesday 21 Dec 2011 23:12:38 full-engl...@live.co.uk wrote:
Does anyone know what the usual procedure is if the code is
unlicensed?
This will almost certainly vary by jurisdiction. In England and Wales at
least (as far as I understand it) no code is unlicensed - copyright
is
On Wednesday 21 Dec 2011 20:07:42 full-engl...@live.co.uk wrote:
Does anyone know what the usual procedure is if the code is unlicensed?
This will almost certainly vary by jurisdiction. In England and Wales at least
(as far as I understand it) no code is unlicensed - copyright is automatic
and
On Thursday 22 Dec 2011 01:12:04 Ionut Biru wrote:
Seems like there's another new dependence, qtwebkit pulls in phonon,
this didn't happen when it was part of qt. Why is this?
because in the past he didn't built html5 support in qt. It would be
insane(from kde perspective) to have
Hi,
On Tuesday 20 Dec 2011 10:01:00 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
But - HTML5 video and audio tags aren't working for me. I tried it in
konqueror, rekonq and aurora. The first frame of the video loads, but it
won't play. This is with either gstreamer or vlc phonon backends.
I tried youtube in
On Tuesday 20 Dec 2011 22:46:14 Alastair Pharo wrote:
I've recently taken over some of the ophaned pure-* packages, including
pure-svn.
Thanks Alastair.
I found that in fact the Pure project migrated from subversion
to mercurial some time ago (see
On Thursday 15 Dec 2011 15:41:55 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
That means we can welcome Timothy Redaelli as new TU team member.
Congratulations!
Congratulations Timothy! Welcome to the team!
Pete.
On Sunday 04 Dec 2011 23:18:13 Dave Reisner wrote:
Sounds like a good candidate for orphanage. Have at it.
oooh.. orphanage as a nouned verb. yum.
On Friday 25 Nov 2011 15:27:28 Ionut Biru wrote:
Every packager please do:
1) reply this email in the mailing list, include gerolde/sigurd username
and sign your reply using your gpg key.
plewis
2) name at least one package you already signed.
pigeonhole
On Friday 02 Dec 2011 22:24:12 Ionut Biru wrote:
missing signature.
dammit! sorry... hang on...
On Friday 25 Nov 2011 15:27:28 Ionut Biru wrote:
Every packager please do:
1) reply this email in the mailing list, include gerolde/sigurd username
and sign your reply using your gpg key.
plewis
2) name at least one package you already signed.
pigeonhole
signature.asc
Description: This
On Monday 28 Nov 2011 15:12:53 Thomas Bächler wrote:
Please note: There are many TUs (and some devs) that didn't reply to
this request yet.
Sorry - I haven't replied to any yet and won't get a chance to until the
weekend. Hope that doesn't delay anything... :-)
On Wednesday 30 Nov 2011 22:14:21 Xyne wrote:
Dave Reisner wrote:
the off topic train goes choo choo crash boom
Back on topic, I agree with Pierre (as I usually do in issues regarding
privacy and security).
AUR accounts should be deletable. Names can be reserved for a fixed
period (from
On Thursday 01 Dec 2011 09:08:39 Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
I do find it kind of abnormal that a TU does want to retain his real name.
To be fair that are loads of potential reasons why someone wouldn't want their
actual identity disclosed in a place where discussions are archived on the web
with
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011, Axilleas P wrote:
Please delete again pyhon2-gitissius due to typo. I built on a
different machine where the typo still existed. Sorry for the
confusion...
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53861
gone.
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011, Seblu wrote:
I'm applying to be a TU. My sponsor is Dave Reisner.
Excellent - great to see you applying again!
Pete.
I can take these:
banner (along with shhmsg and shhopt)
freesynd
qwit
sopwith
whichwayisup
Just orphan the rest if you're not intending on maintaining them any more.
People can pick them up themselves then.
Cheers,
Pete.
Hi Jonathan,
Please fix your mail client so that it doesn't break threads when you post
replies. (I'm not quite sure what you did, since it's always worked out of the
box for me...) Otherwise, it's really difficult to follow a conversation.
Thanks,
Pete.
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Jonathan Steel
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Jonathan Steel wrote:
Obsolete; as of the latest version you can now compile with --nogui.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38760
According to the comment on the AUR page, the latest version can be *run* with
--nogui and doesn't need to be recompiled.
But, this
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for your interest. I don't personally think it's a problem that you don't
currently have a sponsor, since I think people should be able to solicit to the
list if they would like to apply, rather than being required to ask people
off-list. Obviously the discussion period and
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Christopher luna wrote:
Im not even asking you to agree with me, Im asking you to vote and decide if
including urls to warez on pkgbuilds that are on AUR is OFFICIALY ok, or not.
again is not about they being propietary software or about providing
installers. Is ONLY
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Maciej Sitarz wrote:
I'm maintaining hunspell-pl AUR package
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44331).
The problem with the package is that the maintainer of the source
provides only the latest(daily) tarball snapshot. The md5sum of the
tarball changes daily and
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Xyne wrote:
PKGBUILDs should not install anything in a user's home directory.
Absolutely. This should be a hard rule IMO.
Pete.
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
I usually drop a comment before removing a package, so that at least all
users on the notification list get informed. In case of doubt, you can
almost always check aur-general.
Yeah, this is a really good idea IMO.
Pete.
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 08:28:56 PM OK wrote:
Please remove this package:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49444
I created new one with different name.
Done
Can we include package names on removal request emails please? This
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 07:46:15 PM Peter Lewis wrote:
Can we include package names on removal request emails please? This thread
is kinda useless in the archive and I don't know if package ID 49444 was
one that I was using
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Justin Davis wrote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34686 clyde-git
Looks like this is no longer being developed :-(
/me hopes someone pops up to prove him wrong...
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Florian Pritz wrote:
If you agree with this, a firefox-firebug could be re-uploaded, replacing
the actual firefox-extension-firebug-stable.
I'd say go with it, but we should probably wait for at least one more
opinion on the matter.
Sounds good to me; I'm all for
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, speps wrote:
Hi, plowshare recently switched from svn to git
plowshare-svn [1] can be deleted, since
plowshare-git [2] replaces it
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31779
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51591
Sounds good - but I just
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Peter Lewis wrote:
PS. cc'ing dserban
Okay, I heard back from dserban. The SVN package has gone.
Thanks speps.
Pete.
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, speps wrote:
I already uploaded plowshare-git, cause I actually maintain plowshare, and
i'm used to follow its development, since the actual project leader release
a snapshot every 10~ days.
Oh excellent, makes sense then.
Btw, you're right. I'll disown it, if dserban
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, gadget3000 wrote:
tux-ragnarok-full (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34062) - Dead
multiplayer project. Dead source link and I can't find a mirror. 3 votes and
hasn't been updated since Feb 2010. No maintainer.
Agreed - deleted.
Pete.
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, gadget3000 wrote:
theforgottenserver-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21881) The
svn repository is no longer available to the public (Source:
http://otland.net/f55/moved-private-subversion-11833/). There used to be a
public repository at
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011, gadget3000 wrote:
falldown (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11856) is a dead project
and has a dead source link. I can't find a mirror.
poker3d (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9894) is a dead
multiplayer only project. Dead source link, I found a mirror
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Anton Leontiev wrote:
Currently I'm stuck with makedepends/optdepends. There is a number of
dependencies which are optional, but to get PDL work with them as with
optional packages in Arch, it should be compiled with them. So I added
the in both makedepends and
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, J. W. Birdsong wrote:
On 04/12/11 at 10:00pm, Stefan Husmann wrote:
On 12.04.2011 08:58, Peter Lewis wrote:
Done a bit of research...
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Stefan Husmann wrote:
irssi (VCS) * irssi-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6163 *
irssi-git
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:45:52PM +0200, Martti Kühne wrote:
+1 for *-git vcs dupes to stay, where upstream vcs is a different one.
-1 for removal of vcs dupes in general, since apparently different
people prefer different vcs. Besides, how much
Done a bit of research...
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Stefan Husmann wrote:
irssi (VCS)
* irssi-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6163
* irssi-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25781
These both seem official, though the main website points to the SVN repo and
not the git
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011, 郑文辉 wrote:
It is typical to give maintainers at least a week. Also, have you
tried directly emailing them?
Yes, I think the defacto usual practice is to email people directly and then
leave a week if urgent, preferably two weeks. It's quite usual for people to go
on
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
I'll correct myself then, gmail+pentadactyl does not like the
combination of mailing lists I'm on. Some of them are badly configured
(thankfully none of the Arch ones) and have to be used with
reply-to-all, hence sometimes I press the wrong button, not
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011, Loui Chang wrote:
On Tue 05 Apr 2011 18:00 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
Gmail's web interface has THE best approach to threading. Ever. If you
have any other suggestion (web client or linux desktop client) which
comes anywhere close please let me know. Evolution's threading
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Ray Rashif wrote:
Is the packaging workflow not clear enough from the guidelines?
I have to admit (and I don't intend to offend anyone) that I found it a little
confusing at first, though the how to be a packager page appears to have
become a little clearer recently :-)
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 17:28:51 Xyne wrote:
keenerd wrote:
Hi guys.
I am Kyle Keen (keenerd) and am applying to be a TU, sponsored by
Xyne.
I have indeed agreed to sponsor Comrade Keen in his bid to infiltrate the
...wait -- should that not be Commander Keen? ;-)
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 18:57:00 Peter Lewis wrote:
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 17:28:51 Xyne wrote:
keenerd wrote:
Hi guys.
I am Kyle Keen (keenerd) and am applying to be a TU, sponsored by
Xyne.
I have indeed agreed to sponsor Comrade Keen in his bid to infiltrate
On Friday 25 February 2011 11:12:15 Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Well, I'm addressing current blacklisting issues with the AUR [1]. I
noticed that some of the packages in the official repos have AUR
packages as provides, some of them (well, at least one of them, didn't
search for more) were even
On Monday 14 February 2011 13:02:54 Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
On 14 February 2011 13:43, D. Can Celasun dcela...@gmail.com wrote:
I've adopted, updated and reuploaded the ejecter[1] package as
indicator-ejecter[2] to follow the general naming convention regarding
Ayatana packages [3] . Can
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 18:42:15 Felix Kaiser wrote:
WRT licenses, I too think BSD would be a good choice for obvious reasons
(permissive, short/simple, widely used, unversioned, compatible to most
other licenses). That is, if we need a license at all. This licensing
stuff always gets in
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 00:32:17 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 17:57 +0100, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
I would like to add that for some AUR-users, the packages is what they
would have to show for if they were to apply to become a TU.
As far as I know, the AUR history is not
On Monday 07 February 2011 11:23:01 Ray Rashif wrote:
2011/2/7 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com:
I don't think it matters whether PKGBUILDs are software or not.
It never did, but now it does :)
That sounds to me like saying all bash scripts have to be under GPL,
because BASH is
On Monday 07 February 2011 17:46:08 Bernardo Barros wrote:
2011/2/7 Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net:
Sure you can change licenses if you own (Hold copyright to.) all the
relevant code involved.
That's way OT, but I'm curious now... :-).
Then if I did a BSD code that a company used in their
Hi Andrea,
On Monday 07 February 2011 19:25:03 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
Hi TUs,
it's my time to leave the [community] repo.
Ah! Well, thanks for all your work. More time to focus on KDE in [extra],
eh? :-D
I orphaned more packages in the last year and now I orphan the rest:
- choqok
-
On Thursday 03 February 2011 05:39:52 Heiko Baums wrote:
Every binary repo is called something in square brackets like [core],
[extra], [community] etc., which are activated or deactivated
in /etc/pacman.conf, but there is no repo [unsupported]. And at least I
haven't found any reference on
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 13:07:02 white...@gmail.com wrote:
please, can someone remove from aur the following packages, because related
projects are discontinued and sources are not available anymore
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35691
akonadigdata-svn
On Sunday 23 January 2011 16:15:41 Peter Lewis wrote:
On Sunday 16 January 2011 21:07:28 Peter Lewis wrote:
On Sunday 16 January 2011 20:37:13 Seblu wrote:
Tonight I decided to propose me as TU. My sponsor is Peter Lewis.
I am indeed. Let the discussion period begin!
The discussion
Hi Lukas,
On Tuesday 25 January 2011 17:59:21 Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:43:20AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
I would also ask, is there a way to generate a list of packages that have
been flaged out of date for more than n days?
Yes, there is. We did something
On Sunday 16 January 2011 21:07:28 Peter Lewis wrote:
On Sunday 16 January 2011 20:37:13 Seblu wrote:
Tonight I decided to propose me as TU. My sponsor is Peter Lewis.
I am indeed. Let the discussion period begin!
The discussion period has now ended and voting can begin. Please pop along
On Thursday 20 January 2011 00:18:40 member kittykatt wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.dewrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:53:51PM -0500, jonathan wrote:
please delete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22403 as I am
not developing it,
On Thursday 20 January 2011 15:32:49 Ionuț Bîru wrote:
The results are:
yes 20
no0
abstain 8
Congratulations Tom! Welcome aboard the good ship TU!
Pete.
On Monday 17 January 2011 01:19:22 Loui Chang wrote:
Recently I've had the idea that I should move the 'main' AUR git repo,
which I have been the caretaker of to the community server where all
other community and AUR development is done. This would also mean we
would have to run a git daemon,
On Sunday 16 January 2011 20:37:13 Seblu wrote:
Tonight I decided to propose me as TU. My sponsor is Peter Lewis.
I am indeed. Let the discussion period begin!
Pete.
On Thursday 13 January 2011 17:01:42 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 16:57 +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 13.01.2011 16:00, schrieb Marcel Korpel:
Hi everyone,
Can someone please delete ttf-ms-extrafonts [1]; it has no maintainer
and as mutlu_inek said in the comments his
On Tuesday 11 January 2011 21:02:31 Brad Fanella wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Peter Lewis ple...@aur.archlinux.org
wrote:
Where's Xyne when you need him?
I think you mean sleep of which you speak ;-P
Nope. Sorry. You're wrong. :-P
Grammarians have come to the consensus
On Monday 10 January 2011 10:26:14 Magnus Therning wrote:
Does anyone know why this package does not use upstream name ? There is
no way to tell this task package is Task Warrior except looking to the
URI.
There's some confusion on the upstream page, taskwarrior.org. Text like
On Saturday 08 January 2011 23:23:26 Mike Sampson wrote:
[1]: http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/tdl/
I use it. However, if you know better applications for the same job,
please tell me.
Task Warrior - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22085
+1, this is great.
On Saturday 11 December 2010 20:21:53 Dave Reisner wrote:
yes 29
no 0
abstain 1
Welcome in our team.
Todo:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines#TODO_lis
t_for_new_Trusted_Users
Wow! I'm just going to play dumb and assume that the high
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 04:33:09 Loui Chang wrote:
Yeah, I don't have any better suggestion really, and apart from my
general dislike for using whitespace to provide meaning (a la python)
it's pretty clear to me.
I do like to separate words by a space and paragraphs by a blank line.
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 01:51:52 Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com wrote:
As soon as I get back from lab I'm going to put the text up on a wiki
page so we can stop doing massive amounts of scrolling... --Kaiting.
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 21:44:46 keenerd wrote:
After much heavy thought, I withdraw my application. My apologies for
the trouble.
I agree with the others - please reconsider withdrawing. I believe that we
could certainly do with someone with your keenness and skills on the team. I
think
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 12:04:22 Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Peter Lewis ple...@aur.archlinux.org
wrote:
While reading this, one more small thing came to mind: I wonder if we
should make it clear that though *the same* proposal requires a waiting
period
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 13:34:53 Ronald van Haren wrote:
and who determines if there is a substantial difference between the
two votes (I'm talking about edge cases here)? And what exactly is
this substantial difference that is required, how do we quantify it?
Indeed, there are
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 15:23:01 Xyne wrote:
I think the passage concerning similar proposals is too vague. There is
no way to define those terms in a way that is unambiguous in all cases and
trying to do so is futile and condemned to a pedantic spiral.
I trust the human factor to
On Thursday 09 December 2010 00:42:20 Loui Chang wrote:
I've removed that passage, changed bylaws to by-laws, and changed
YES / NO to YES or NO.
I would prefer the non hyphenated spelling. *shrug*
:-)
...and every time I've come across the word it's had an e in it: byelaw.
*double shrug*
On Thursday 09 December 2010 00:45:33 Loui Chang wrote:
On Wed 08 Dec 2010 11:59 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Let's wait another day to get some more comments and incorporate any
last changes. If it changes during the discussion
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 12:30:35 Seblu wrote:
2010/12/7 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Michael Trunner mich...@trunner.de
wrote:
Well, it's really simple. As autofs already have 10 votes, you just need
to apply to become a TU and you will be
Hey,
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 15:37:41 Xyne wrote:
I've rewritten that section with some changes (see below). I've tried to
keep the wording unambiguous and relatively simple. Note the following
functional changes:
* If 50% or more of all active TUs vote NO then the vote is rejected even
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 16:44:36 Xyne wrote:
Peter Lewis wrote:
Do we require that a proposal has only yes and no as options, as well
as abstain? Could a proposal present a list of options? How would this
affect the voting, or should it not be allowed? (If not, I think we
should state
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 16:58:49 Xyne wrote:
Third version:
Standard Voting Procedure (SVP) describes the formal procedure used by TUs
to accept or reject proposals regarding TU affairs.
SVP begins with a proposal, for example the addition of a TU or an
amendment to the bylaws. The
Hang on, I just went through this again:
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 16:58:49 Xyne wrote:
Third version:
Standard Voting Procedure (SVP) describes the formal procedure used by TUs
to accept or reject proposals regarding TU affairs.
SVP begins with a proposal, for example the addition of a
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 19:02:59 Xyne wrote:
Peter Lewis wrote:
This means that we cannot override (A) in the rest of the byelaws. I can
imagine that we might want to create something requiring (say) a 2/3rds
majority for some type of serious proposal at some point... How about
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 20:53:40 Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Thorsten Töpper
atsut...@freethoughts.dewrote:
... I'm stuck between an Abstain and a No and I guess some other TUs are
also thinking about how they should handle this...
You can stop being stuck;
On Sunday 05 December 2010 23:14:14 Loui Chang wrote:
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 22:52 +, Peter Lewis wrote:
I'd support some kind of reworking of the quorum for TU votes, since as
Kaitling points out, missing a meeting due to weather, car problems, etc.
doesn't really apply (though
On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:07:59 Kaiting Chen wrote:
As a general policy we wait a week before
orphaning after you have contacted the maintainer expressing your desire to
adopt to package.
At least two weeks would be my minimum. It's perfectly possible that someone
is just on holiday /
On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:56:37 Ray Rashif wrote:
On 2 December 2010 20:48, Peter Lewis ple...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:07:59 Kaiting Chen wrote:
As a general policy we wait a week before
orphaning after you have contacted the maintainer expressing your
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
