Re: [aur-general] SPAM report, AUR comment

Hi Spam comment: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/johnhamm33/comments

Re: [aur-general] Hamster-time-tracker in the AUR (Was: Spring cleaning)

On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 6:13 PM Santiago Torres-Arias wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 01:29:31PM +0100, SanskritFritz wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 5:27 PM Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > &

[aur-general] Hamster-time-tracker in the AUR (Was: Spring cleaning)

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 5:27 PM Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote: > > Hi, > > > hamster-time-tracker - Time tracking application that helps you to keep > Just a word of warning. I tried to adopt hamster-time-tracking and it > was more pain than what it was really worth... I love this a

Re: [aur-general] TU for moving DDNet to community?

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Rafael Fontenelle wrote: > Is there a TU that would like to adopt it and move it to community repo? archlinuxcn actually carries it. Not sure if that is enough.

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Christian Rebischke

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski < bpiotrow...@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 2017-02-22 14:13, Levente Polyak wrote: > > cheers, > > Levente > > I just want to say that I'm happy I'm already a TU so I don't have to > undergo Levente's review... > > THIS. is the main reason I don

Re: [aur-general] Somebody using freetype2-infinality, too?

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Justin Dray wrote: > I believe infinality is dead now. I saw someone posted the other week about > this new fonts meta package [1] that allows similar things, but all my > remaining arch systems are headless these days, but I would give it a go > rather than infina

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application: Levente Polyak

On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Felix Yan wrote: > With 29 yes and only 1 no votes, I am glad to welcome Levente Polyak to > our team! Congratulations! > Another Hungarian :) Congratulations Levente.

Re: [aur-general] ttf-droid-sans duplicate of community/ttf-droid?

On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > I don't really understand the difference between community/ttf-droid > and any of these: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0&K=ttf-droid > > Any idea about duplicates in there? ttf-droid-sans Comment by graysky 2012-10-16 21:14 This

Re: [aur-general] dockapps.windowmaker.org website is down

On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: > > > Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 12:03:21 +0100 > > From: sanskritfr...@gmail.com > > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > > Subject: [aur-general] dockapps.windowmaker.org website is down > > > > There is a proble

Re: [aur-general] dockapps.windowmaker.org website is down

On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, SanskritFritz wrote: > There is a problem with dockapps.windowmaker.org for some months now. > Consequently some dockapps are broken now since the download url does not > exist. Bidulock suggests we include the source tarball into the package for > th

[aur-general] dockapps.windowmaker.org website is down

There is a problem with dockapps.windowmaker.org for some months now. Consequently some dockapps are broken now since the download url does not exist. Bidulock suggests we include the source tarball into the package for the time being. I know this is against the policy in the AUR, how should we pro

[aur-general] JOYOAUTO spam

Please delete the spam comment by JOYOAUTO here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/autoaur/ I don't know of any other occurences in the AUR.

[aur-general] celestia-addon-.* merge requests

I have renamed several packages of mine. Please merge the following packages: celestia-addon-apollo-soyuz -> celestia-addon-apollo_soyuz celestia-addon-atlantis-2 -> celestia-addon-atlantis_2 celestia-addon-deep-impact -> celestia-addon-deep_impact celestia-addon-deep-impact-spacecraft -> celestia

[aur-general] Deletion request for otf-source-sans-pro ttf-source-sans-pro

Hi, I think my packages otf-source-sans-pro [1] and ttf-source-sans-pro [2] could be deleted as is is present now in the [extra] repo [3]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/otf-source-sans-pro/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-source-sans-pro/ [3] https://www.archlinux.org/packages

[aur-general] Delete egoboo-data

Hi, please remove the package egoboo-data [1] because I have merged it into the egoboo package, so it is not needed anymore. I'm the maintainer of both packages. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/egoboo-data/ Thank you.

[aur-general] Fwd: wmnd AUR package update

From: SanskritFritz Date: Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:19 PM Subject: wmnd AUR package update To: ferna...@zerial.org Hi, would you please update the wmnd package of yours. I sent an improved PKGBULD to the comments page. Thanks

Re: [aur-general] Suspicious spam account

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Daniel Micay wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:04 AM, GSC wrote: >> https://aur.archlinux.org/account/JOYOAUTO/ >> Spam here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/auto-complete/ >> > > Thanks, definitely a spammer. Account is suspended now. Should we report posts

Re: [aur-general] Merge requests for logkeys-svn and logkeys-keymaps-svn

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Felix Yan wrote: > On Monday, April 15, 2013 11:04:37 SanskritFritz wrote: >> Hi, please merge >> logkeys-svn [1] into logkeys-git [2] >> logkeys-keymaps-svn [3] into logkeys-keymaps-git [4] > Both merged, thanks. Thank you, you are fast as lightning!

[aur-general] Merge requests for logkeys-svn and logkeys-keymaps-svn

Hi, please merge logkeys-svn [1] into logkeys-git [2] and logkeys-keymaps-svn [3] into logkeys-keymaps-git [4] due to upstream's switch from svn to git. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/logkeys-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/logkeys-git/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lo

Re: [aur-general] brz pkgver() problem when updating on existing bzr repo

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Maxime GAUDUIN wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:00 PM, SanskritFritz >wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Maxime GAUDUIN > wrote: > > > > > You need to use: bzr:// > anamnesis.bzr.sourceforge.net/bzrroot/anamnes

Re: [aur-general] brz pkgver() problem when updating on existing bzr repo

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Maxime GAUDUIN wrote: > You need to use: bzr://anamnesis.bzr.sourceforge.net/bzrroot/anamnesis/ > This is the output of 'bzr config parent_location', do not forget the > trailing slash. I'll update the wiki accordingly, repos not hosted on > Launchpad do not exhibi

Re: [aur-general] brz pkgver() problem when updating on existing bzr repo

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Maxime GAUDUIN wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:21 PM, SanskritFritz >wrote: > > > As I updated the PKGBUILD for he new autobump feature I observed the > > following problem on my > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/anamnesis-bzr

[aur-general] brz pkgver() problem when updating on existing bzr repo

As I updated the PKGBUILD for he new autobump feature I observed the following problem on my https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/anamnesis-bzr package: When I run makepkg the first time, the bzr repo gets fetched, all ok. However running makepkg the second time gives the following error: ==> ERROR

Re: [aur-general] Merge requests for logkeys-keymap and logkeys-keymap-svn

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Felix Yan wrote: > On Monday, April 08, 2013 23:10:54 SanskritFritz wrote: >> I have renamed two of my packages, uploaded the new versions. >> >> Please merge the votes, comments and notifications of >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Merge requests for logkeys-keymap and logkeys-keymap-svn

I have renamed two of my packages, uploaded the new versions. Please merge the votes, comments and notifications of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/logkeys-keymap/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/logkeys-keymaps/ and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/logkeys-keymap-svn/ into https:/

Re: [aur-general] Tower Toppler was orphaned

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Laurent Carlier wrote: > Le samedi 23 mars 2013 22:26:10 SanskritFritz a écrit : > > At my usual 'aurphan --aur' run I discovered that > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/toppler/ was orphaned. I adopted it, > > but would like t

Re: [aur-general] Tower Toppler was orphaned

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 23 March 2013 23:26, SanskritFritz wrote: > > At my usual 'aurphan --aur' run I discovered that > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/toppler/ was orphaned. I adopted it, > > but would like to kn

[aur-general] Tower Toppler was orphaned

At my usual 'aurphan --aur' run I discovered that https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/toppler/ was orphaned. I adopted it, but would like to know why it was orphaned. Can you guys tell me who the previous maintainer was? In the PKGBUILD there is some contributors listed, but I don't know who was th

Re: [aur-general] TU application from graysky - voting period

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:01 PM, member graysky wrote: > > Thanks for supporting the application, Xyne, and to those who > participated in the subsequent discussion. I was really happy to have > read the kind words from some of the the non-TUs who posted in support > of me as well. Thanks guys!

Re: [aur-general] firehol and me-tv disowned

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: > Both packages have been moved. Thanks, I adopted firehol.

Re: [aur-general] TU application from graysky

If my opinion as a mere arch user counts for anything in this thread, I'd like to express my gratitude towards graysky for his linux-ck repository and AUR packages. I'm running that kernel without any problem since 2011-04-10 (from my pacman.log). Honestly when I saw his email about applying as a T

Re: [aur-general] firehol and me-tv disowned

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: > On 03/06/2013 11:32 PM, SanskritFritz wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: >>> I've disowned the firehol >> >> This is sad news. May I know the reason? Of course when you drop

Re: [aur-general] firehol and me-tv disowned

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: > I've disowned the firehol This is sad news. May I know the reason? Of course when you drop it to the AUR I will immediately pick it up then.

Re: [aur-general] qt4 replaces qt

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:35 PM, SanskritFritz wrote: > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: >> qt4 is in [extra], please AUR maintainers fix your packages! > > I'm commenting packages that use qt one by one now. Will there be an > automatic message sent

Re: [aur-general] qt4 replaces qt

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > qt4 is in [extra], please AUR maintainers fix your packages! I'm commenting packages that use qt one by one now. Will there be an automatic message sent to packages that depend on qt?

Re: [aur-general] Orphan and merge request

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Felix Yan wrote: > Merged, thanks. On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Ike Devolder wrote: > merged, thx You guys rock, thanks! So, I guess the votes doubled now as there were two merges :p

Re: [aur-general] Orphan and merge request

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Lex Black wrote: > Hello > > I want following package be orphaned: > https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/gimp-resynth/ > > and merged with > > https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/gimp-resynth-git/

Re: [aur-general] TU application

Spotted the first mistake as TU: top posting!! Wait... oops... :) Congratulations! On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Alexandre Filgueira < alexfilgue...@cinnarch.com> wrote: > Great! > > Thank you everybody :D > > 2013/1/31 Martín Cigorraga > > > Congratz! > > >

Re: [aur-general] Delete kupfer-add-git

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Felix Yan wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:55 PM, SanskritFritz > wrote: > > Please delete my package > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kupfer-add-git/ > > as I have renamed it to kupfer-adds-git. No need to merge anything (n

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: openclonk-hg -> openclonk-git

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Felix Yan wrote: > On Friday, January 25, 2013 09:30:39 AM SanskritFritz wrote: > > Hi, openclonk development has switched to git. Please merge > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openclonk-hg/ > > into > > https://aur.archlinux

Re: [aur-general] Building polly-b-gone

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:18 PM, wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:34:47PM +0100, SanskritFritz wrote: >> Well, patching the makefile with -lGLU solved the problem, no need to >> symlink libGLEW anymore. Can you please explain the reason? > ---end quoted text--- > > I

Re: [aur-general] Building polly-b-gone

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:30 PM, wrote: >> please comment on my hack to symlink libGLEW.so > > Please do not do such thing. If binary version of package depends on > outdated version of library, rebuild this package from source. If source > version of package is incompatible with newer version of

[aur-general] Building polly-b-gone

I'm the maintainer of the polly-b-gone [1] package. Recently I made some changes, and also a comment arrived by demonicmaniac. I'm not much of a gcc and linker guru, so please comment on my hack to symlink libGLEW.so and on demonicmaniac's comment about adding -lGLU to LDFLAGS in the makefile. I se

[aur-general] ode-dp can be deleted

The ode-dp package [1] is obsolete since extra/ode is compiled with double-precision. It is orphaned for this reason. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ode-dp/

Re: [aur-general] No confirmation link received

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Menachem Moystoviz wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Evangelos Foutras > wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Menachem Moystoviz >> wrote: >>> Couldn't you register kuppi...@gmail.com with gmail, and then try >>> using the reset password form? >>>

Re: [aur-general] Disown request

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Vinycius Maia wrote: > >The package is not updated since 2011, > the maintainer has no activity since last year, > the only ones 3 packages of him are outdated > not enough? https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository Q: Foo in AUR is outdated;

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: tmux-git

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Alex Belanger wrote: > Sanskritfritz, > > I like your idea and am actually working on an API to check for maintainer > changes in a range of dates while providing as much details as possible on > that change. It should be ready by the end of the d

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: tmux-git

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 04:48:11PM +0200, SanskritFritz wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Disowned. Thanks. >> >> I find this a bit int

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: tmux-git

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > Hi, > > Disowned. Thanks. I find this a bit interesting and alarming. The OP has not shared any details about any reason or about writing emails to the maintainer, nevetheless you disowned the package without asking. May we know the reas

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] fish 2.0.0b2 in [community-testing]

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > As you probably know, fish release available in [community] is very old. > Code hasn't been updated since 2009. Official website doesn't work > currently, but there was the info that development is stalled. > > Alex Søndergaard sugge

Re: [aur-general] AUR and unsuported architectures

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Martti Kühne wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 08:52:39PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: >> >> But that would simply add "arm" or "ppc" to the ARCH array. The point >> is to know beforehand if the package works - currently I can know if a >> package works or not

[aur-general] Please merge plasmoid-embed-win to kdeplasma-applets-embed-win-svn

, SanskritFritz

[aur-general] Merge fishfish-git to fish-shell-git

Please merge fishfish-git [1] comments to fish-shell-git [2] because the git repo had been moved to github [3]. Thanks in advance. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59641 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59956 [3] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29387

Re: [aur-general] Vegastrike games orphaned in the AUR

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > SanskritFritz wrote: > > Hi, I noticed that you orphaned the vegastrike games. May I know the > reason? I might be willing to take over, if it's worth it, upstream seems > to be active. > Thanks > SanskritF

[aur-general] Vegastrike games orphaned in the AUR

Hi, I noticed that you orphaned the vegastrike games. May I know the reason? I might be willing to take over, if it's worth it, upstream seems to be active. Thanks SanskritFritz

Re: [aur-general] Inactive user tdy

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Christoph Vigano wrote: > On 04/11/2012 09:40 AM, SanskritFritz wrote: > > AUR package maintainers should announce their absence? Where and how? > > Oh sorry, I confused that with the rules for a TU. m( > But this would have been nice nonetheles

Re: [aur-general] Inactive user tdy

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Christoph Vigano wrote: > On 04/11/2012 12:10 AM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > > What if he's travelling the world for a year? > > Shouldn't he have announced that? I mean, that's a prolonged inactivity > for sure. > AUR package maintainers should announce their ab

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - György Balló - results

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > The voting period for György Balló (City-busz) has ended and I'm > pleased to welcome him as a new TU. Go hungarians! :) ngaba and city-busz, is there any other hungarian in the team? Congratulations, György!

Re: [aur-general] Which aur uploader is better, aurploader or burp?

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: > Mayby this way.. > > #!/bin/sh > makepkg -S > burp $(source PKGBUILD; echo ${pkgname}-${pkgver}-${pkgrel}.src.tar.gz) > > This absolutely sure we upload the same version as in PKGBUILD Nice, thanks! 2012/2/17 Cédric Girard : > 2012/2/1

Re: [aur-general] Which aur uploader is better, aurploader or burp?

2012/2/17 Cédric Girard : > 2012/2/17 Alireza Savand > >> For downloading yes of course it's nice to have one like yaourt, but for >> uploading it's little bit useless. >> > > No, it's really useful when you are updating your PKGBUILD on an headless > server. It *is* very useful. I maintain numer

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: dark-oberon

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Anton Bazhenov wrote: > Hello, > > could you please orphan the 'dark-oberon' package: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1876 > > It hasn't been updated since 2006, and doesn't work for a long time. I > e-mailed the maintainer, but he didn't respond. Do y

Re: [aur-general] Voting.

2011/12/19 Allan McRae > On 19/12/11 16:53, Блогер wrote: > > How to vote for package in the AUR? > > When you are logged in, click on the "Vote" link just above the comment > box. > Which means, you have to register first :)

Re: [aur-general] Massive drop

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:09 AM, widow...@myopera.com wrote: > Hello, > I have less and less time to check my packages (I also have a life IRL), I > think of giving up the packages: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?SeB=m&K=wido > >

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: wdfs

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Florian Pritz wrote: > On 29.09.2011 16:25, SanskritFritz wrote: > > I'm willing to maintain the wdfs [1] package. The current owner has not > > responded to requests for over a year now, I've sent him an email 10 days > > ago, t

[aur-general] Orphan request: wdfs

I'm willing to maintain the wdfs [1] package. The current owner has not responded to requests for over a year now, I've sent him an email 10 days ago, there is no reply. Please orphan the package. Thanks in advance. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14476

Re: [aur-general] Head over Heels (hoh 1.01-5) download problems

t; [2011-09-23 10:54:23 +0200] SanskritFritz: > > The problem is that makepkg uses wget to download the sources > > Just a note: curl will be the default in the next release. > That is good news I guess, although I prefer wget's output with the progress bar much more. I wonder, ho

[aur-general] Head over Heels (hoh 1.01-5) download problems

I took over the maintenance of hoh. The problem is that makepkg uses wget to download the sources, but wget gets disabled upstream via .htaccess. I contacted the author, he said, he has no sufficient permissions to change this on the webserver where the files are hosted. The previous AUR maintainer

Re: [aur-general] [deletion request] cant and cannot

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Btw: It was even accepted by Debian: > http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cant.html > > WOW!

[aur-general] [deletion request] cant and cannot

Please remove those packages from AUR: cant - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47852 cannot - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47859 Those packages must be deleted immediately, they have hurt my feelings! Also several packaging standards were violated, so numerous, I cant even lis