On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:45 PM Aniket Pradhan wrote:
> Thanks a lot for taking over these packages. I am sure you would take
> good care of them. :D
Thank you! :-)
As a first step, I updated python-requests-cache to 0.5.2-1 …
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 1:34 PM Aniket Pradhan wrote:
> That's great. What is your user name, so that I can add you as a
> co-maintainer? I will back out of the package after that.
simon04
https://aur.archlinux.org/account/simon04
Hi Aniket,
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:41 AM Aniket Pradhan wrote:
> I would request the interested people to have a look at my profile [1]
> which states the packages I am maintaining currently.
I'd be happy to adopt
* python-requests-cache
* python2-requests-cache
* release-bot
* release-bot-gi
Hi,
is there a canonical way to distinguish the active Java version in the
launch script of a Java application?
(a) I could do a switch on the `archlinux-java get` output. However,
this strategy might fail for unconsidered JVMs from AUR.
(b) I could parse the `java -version` output. However, the o
Hi Levente, hi Lukas!
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 4:52 PM Levente Polyak via aur-general
wrote:
> I've spoken to Lukas and am now co-maintaining the package. Together I
> believe we will achieve faster update cycles.
That's great news. Thank you so much to both of you!
Simon
Hi Arch!
(I'm not sure whether I'm posting to the correct mailing list.)
I'm a happy user of IntelliJ IDEA. Unfortunately, the community
package intellij-idea-community-edition is out-of-date most of the
time. As of writing, it has been updated at 2018-07-10 and flagged
again on 2018-07-12. In the
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general
wrote:
> This looks quite cool!
Thanks :)
> 1) How does this handle PKGBUILDs that, say, have their homepage on
> github, but do not tag releases there -- because :( :( :( -- and instead
> push releases to PyPI or npmjs or somethi
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Michael Kogan wrote:
> I am wondering, what about PKGBUILDs
> whose source is hosted at Launchpad or Sourceforge? Those are quite common
> hosters, are there plans to add them? Thanks!
I see the following difficulties with Launchpad or Sourceforge (as a
infreq
Hi aur-general,
as a maintainer of fifty-something AUR packages I found it difficult
to keep track of new upstream versions. I would subscribe to various
RSS feeds to keep track of some.
Recently, I sat down and wrote a tool "aur-out-of-date" which, given a
username or a list of packages, checks
Hi all,
I would like to upload a split package for gradle/gradle-doc.
However, uploading this split package fails:
> AUR submission error:
> • You are not allowed to overwrite the
> • gradle-doc
> • package.
I assume this is due to gradle-doc currently not specifying
`pkgbase=gradle` (as hinted
Hi,
please disown the package gradle
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gradle/
as the current maintainer apparently is no longer active and the package
has been flagged out of date in September, 2012.
Thanks,
Simon
Hi,
please remove the outdated and unmaintained package usb-creator-trunk:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/usb-creator-trunk/
Note that the package usb-creator is up-to-date and maintained:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/usb-creator/
Thanks,
Simon
Hi,
why do we have
python-markdown 2.1.1-2
as well as
python2-markdown 2.1.1-2
in community?
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=markdown
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/python-markdown/
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/python2-markdown/
Cheers
Simo
Hi,
the packages gill-sans-font and ttf-gill-sans provide the same font. It
would make sense to delete one.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9843
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18570
Cheers
Simon
PS: Please CC responses.
Hi,
sinatra [1] seems to be replaced by ruby-sinatra [2]. Hence, delete [1]?
Regards,
Simon
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36046
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37698
Please consider to remove gnome-panel-no-limit-places-menu [1] as it is
completely out-dated.
Thanks!
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39415
Hi,
the AUR packages [1] and [2] are deprecated according to the submitter's
comment.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45330
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40337
Hi all,
the following two packages seem to be duplicates:
* file-browser-applet [1]
* gnome-menu-file-browser-applet [2]
The maintainer of the second package considered to remove that package in
the comment section.
Regards,
Simon
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16452
[2] http:
wireshark-devel [1] is a very outdated package (1.0.8 instead of 1.4.1
from extra). We should consider to delete it.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27349
Hi,
the AUR package ttf-ubuntu-beta [1] is outdated and replaced by the
packages mentioned below. I'd remove it.
ttf-ubuntu-family-fonts [2] and ttf-ubuntu-font-family [3] provide the new
ubuntu font. The former package uses a package name not complying with the
source filename. Further o
ters 0-11:
Error: Unbound module Dgraph
ocamlgraph[1] has been orphaned, so I suggest first of all to remove it.
Then we'll work out which of the other two to keep.
I think, it has been orphaned when I started this discussion, but I'm not
sure about that.
Regards,
Simon Legner
Hi,
the package clementine-bin [1] is outdated a duplicate of the up-to-date
package clementine. Please remove it.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35216
Hi all,
do we really need three packages of the OCaml library ocamlgraph [1]? The
packages are all up-to-date, but maintained by three different users. The
correctest one according to the specified dependencies IMHO is
ocamlgraph-withoutfindlib [2], which also has the minimal code for
buil
Hi all,
I'd like to hear your opinion on the naming of the AUR packages [1] of the
QTScrobbler application [2].
The oldest package is "qtscrob" referring to the URL of the sourceforge
page and the source code archive name. Although the name of the
application stated on the homepage is "QTS
Hi,
please remove the package merkaartor-svn [1] from AUR. It now uses git as
version control and an respective package is already available. The svn
directory [2] does not exist anymore.
Thanks!
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18182
[2] http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications
Hi,
I think the package sabnzbd-0.5 [1] can be removed because it is outdated,
orphaned and replaced by the package sabnzbd [2].
Thanks!
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34203
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13691
Thank you for your hints! I modified the PKGBUILD and submitted it.
I just uploaded qtscrobbler-cli as qtscrob-cli. So the mentioned packages
are free to be removed.
I didn't get a result when searching for qtscrobbler in AUR. So I built
and submitted qtscrobbler as a new package. Just as explanation for the
duplication ...
Mentioning the term qtscrobbler i
Please remove my AUR packages qtscrobbler [1] and qtscrobbler-cli [2] due
to duplication.
Thanks!
Simon Legner
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35488
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35489
Hi,
please remove the AUR package »amarok-rc1« since it is outdated.
Thanks in advance!
simon
30 matches
Mail list logo
