Alright, disregard my reply. Sorry. ^^;
Smartboy
Just wondering, as a user, does this mean Pacman will now complain if one
builds and installs unsigned packages from the AUR?
Smartboy
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as discussed all new packages have to be signed from now on. This mean
> that
This reminded me, I saw a package called Lyx-newest (
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48936 ) which, for all
intents and purposes, seems to just be a versioned bumped extra
package. I thought the policy was that these weren't allowed? Maybe
I'm confused about the policy?
Smartb
Ok can someone please remove this person from the mailing list?
What I do not like about the GPL is that it forces people to republish
derivative works under the GPL license, rather than under another
license. As long as the maintainer (aka copyright holder) are allowed to
specify their own license then I'd be fine with it, though.
Smartboy
et their session id. If it were one of the binary
repos, I'd understand, but at this point it just seems like Fear,
Uncertainty, and Doubt have visited once again.
Smartboy
On 10/24/2010 10:06 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
2010/10/24 Lukáš Jirkovský:
On 24 October 2010 17:42, Smartboy wrote:
Hello,
Today I noticed that in AUR there are two packages which seem to do the same
thing, one named Aptana[1] and the other Aptana-Studio[2]. Looks like
Aptana-Studio is much
Aptana-Studio to be deleted.
Thanks,
Smartboy
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7147
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31634
Or something like that...
>
The reason I've seen against that is that someone could edit a PKGBUILD
in order to include malicious content (not like they couldn't do it
already, though only with new/orphaned packages). Overall I do think
that the ability to allow multiple maintainers would be a good idea
since it allows for group collaboration (similar to how subversion
repositories allow multiple maintainers).
Smartboy
t reply me; so I guess he is MIA.
> Just for interest: What is "MIA"?
>
>
> Regards,
> Bernhard
M(issing) I(n) A(ction) :)
Smartboy
found putting the files in /opt and using
proper scripts/symlinks worked best for it. I've seen other binary
packages (for example Enemy Territory: Quake Wars) use this, and it
works for them.
Smartboy
UR whenever the new version is released(if ever).
Yes it is old, but it is available at Brothersoft
<http://www.brothersoft.com/desktube-223167.html>. I'm no TU, but I'd
say it can be deleted, since it is easy enough to run DeskTube from the
air file.
Smartboy
ugh. I think with the small market share Linux has,
>> it's more trouble than it's worth for them.
>>
> It maybe, though it would be nice to have something like that around I
> believe.
There is always Nightingale, the fork of Songbird which runs on Linux.
Smartboy
#x27;t come to the main repos
for a while (that 500+ package rebuild would probably take a while to
get through, even with the whole team just focusing on that and
neglecting their jobs), would mean you'd not be losing anything very
fast.
Smartboy
ained_by_me/xaralx/src/XaraLX-0.7r1785/wxOil'
> make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>
> /usr/include/glib-2.0/gio/giotypes.h is included in glib2,
> /usr/include/wx-2.8/wx/unix/gsockunx.h is included in wxgtk.
> What is to do in such cases? Is this a bug in glib2 or in wxgtk?
> Regards Stefan
>
The problem may be bitrot. The latest Xara Linux package was released 3
years ago, and since then not much has been done to maintain it.
Smartboy
installs just fine with it, but running it is a whole
different story, and bugs pop out everywhere when using OpenJDK6. Would it
be appropriate to make it depend on JRE instead?
Smartboy
I know it used to be required for Aptana, which is why it was uploaded (I
think). Now it isn't required by it anymore, though.
Smartboy
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Phillip Smith
> wrote:
> > I'm going throu
//aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2719>:
Doesn't work anymore, and isn't supported either.
rstatd <http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2557>:
Doesn't work anymore, program itself last updated in 2005.
Hope this helps make AUR just a little bit cleaner. ;)
Smartboy
g sources is preferred over binaries in Arch.
If you want an example of a PKGBUILD which converts a binary deb package to
a tar.gz, see my oz-e17-tools
package<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23227>
.
Smartboy
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:51:29 -0700
> schrieb Smartboy :
>
> > In order for it to be updated in AUR, you need to at least increment
> > the PKGBUILD's pkgrel by one. Otherwise it won't update it.
>
>
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Nicola Fontana wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> what is the common practice when facing a PKGBUILD update that does not
> change the final binary package nor the dependency tree (let's say, a
> type in an "echo" message or a wrong # Contributor: line)? Do I have to
> increment
x.org/packages.php?ID=7147). So I request that the
previous two packages be deleted.
Thanks!
Smartboy
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Is anyone from North America having issues? Is it a continental thing?
>
No trouble here, it pings just fine here in Washington state.
--- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9025ms
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:31 PM, nathan owe. wrote:
> ok. well i guess i can copy the fsprc file to /usr/share/fsp/ and make a
> install script to let the users know where to get the file and how to do it?
>
>
> Ronald van Haren wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:25 AM, nathan owe.
>> wrote:
still wants to install the docs to a non standard dir. and i seen
>> the mandir={$pkgdir} instead of pkgname
>>
> so how do i tell it where to install the docs at
>
You can always move the docs manually if all else fails. Just use install to
move it. Not very clean, but it works for the time being.
Smartboy
require a
different script). :)
Smartboy
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> On 05/05/2009, Smartboy wrote:
>> I accidentally uploaded the package with the wrong name (forgot the
>> -git). I uploaded it again with the right name. Please delete it. :)
> Next time tell us the package name!!
>
I accidentally uploaded the package with the wrong name (forgot the
-git). I uploaded it again with the right name. Please delete it. :)
Smartboy
oductivity. It follows the same line of thought. While you don't
find the games necessary, other people do, as games can get rid of
stress after a hard day at work (for example).
Smartboy
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 04:25:27PM -0700, Smartboy wrote:
>> Weren't community packages supposed to be removed from AUR? I thought
>> there was consensus months ago to remove it.
>
> It's in the works.
>
>
Weren't community packages supposed to be removed from AUR? I thought
there was consensus months ago to remove it.
Smartboy
can move it to unsupported.
Smartboy
packages only.
>
So then would we include the community packages at
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/ ? I kind of like that idea, keeps
things separate.
Smartboy
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Smartboy wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Evangelos Foutras
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Smartboy wrote:
>>>
>>>&g
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> Smartboy wrote:
>
>> Problem is, I forgot to change the maintainer stuff at the top of the
>> script, and when I try to edit it, even changing the pkgrel value doesn't
>> work. I can't get the PKGB
KGBUILD on the
site to change (I used another package's PKGBUILD to make mine). Can anyone
help?
Also, I am requesting the make-e17 script be removed. It does basically the
same thing as my script, but hasn't worked in a year and has been flagged
out of date for a while.
Thanks,
Smartboy
A new version of ecomorph is out, and the GIT is out of date right now. I
have created a new ecomorph package for these, and the others (which are now
out of date, broken, and were already orphaned) need to be deleted.
Thanks,
Smartboy
37 matches
Mail list logo
