Apparently, someone just uploaded it and then orphaned it, perhaps he
noticed that there have been a git package which is exactly the same
as his.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtkparasite/
[zeitgeist-dataprovider-firefox][1] is orphaned and obsoleted long
ago, it is actually a bzr package but with a unqualified name, and
the source is dead.
[zeitgeist-datasource-firefox][2] provides the same thing using a
released tarball.
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zeitgeist-datapro
1. [python-dulwich][1] => [python2-dulwich][2]
2. [python-dulwich-git][3] => [python2-dulwich-git][4]
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-dulwich
[2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-dulwich
[3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-dulwich-git
[4]: https://aur.archlinux
2013/12/10 Jerome Leclanche :
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:16 PM, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng)
> wrote:
>> 2013/12/10 Dave Reisner :
>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:54:42PM +0800, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
>>>> 2013/12/10 Dave Reisner :
>>>> > On Tue, Dec
2013/12/10 Dave Reisner :
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:54:42PM +0800, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
>> 2013/12/10 Dave Reisner :
>> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:45:58PM +0800, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
>> >> 2013/12/10 Karol Blazewicz :
>> >> > On Tue
2013/12/10 Dave Reisner :
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:45:58PM +0800, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
>> 2013/12/10 Karol Blazewicz :
>> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:18 PM, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng)
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hey, I wonder if it is possible to query th
2013/12/10 Karol Blazewicz :
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:18 PM, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng)
> wrote:
>> Hey, I wonder if it is possible to query the `provides` of a package in AUR?
>
> Is e.g. 'cower -ii wine-git' good enough?
Acctually, I want to know if it is possible to
Hey, I wonder if it is possible to query the `provides` of a package in AUR?
The source URL in the package [graphviz-hg][1] is dead, and graphviz
is now using Git as VCS, a new package is created at
[graphviz-git][2].
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/graphviz-hg/
[2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/graphviz-git/
Package [pyobfsproxy][1] should be merged to [obfsproxy][2], because
the upstream project name does not changed, only a python version
replaces the old C version, and package [obfsproxy][2] has been
updated with the python version.
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyobfsproxy/
[2]: https://
[jhbuild-git_2][1] is duplicated to package [jhbuild-git][2], please
delete [jhbuild-git_2][1].
The later [jhbuild-git][2] couldn't be built for a while in th past
(not the case now, it has been updated), user @spirtbrat uploaded his
fix as a new package with a nameing like "*_2" instead of trying
2013/5/15 Myles English :
>
> 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) writes:
>
>> I have tried the following, none of them working
>>
>> source="git://../.."
>>
>> source="git+../../"
>>
>> source="git+/path/to/somefile"
2013/5/14 Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick :
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:38 PM, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng)
> wrote:
>> I have tried the following, none of them working
>>
>> source="git://../.."
>>
>> source="git+../../"
>>
>> sour
I have tried the following, none of them working
source="git://../.."
source="git+../../"
source="git+/path/to/somefile"
2012/11/2 Ronald van Haren :
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
>> On 11/02/2012 01:20 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Laurent Carlier
>>> wrote:
Le vendredi 2 novembre 2012 09:10:47 Bartłomiej Piotrowski a écrit :
> The vote for Felix
[komodoedit-beta](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39532) is
duplicate to
[komodo-edit-testing](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53616)
which provides not just beta version but all pre-released versions.
[komodoide](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27859) is
duplicate t
2012/3/27 Tai-Lin Chu :
> @Alexander Rødseth
> that's "how it should work", but unfortunately none of these work well
> in reality. my reason of cloning is that "the time when these packages
> will update or fit your need is known". god knows when these packages
> will update; it could be weeks or
[biew]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11625
2012/2/22 Jozef Riha :
> hello, please remove dcron-maint
> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46757) as this was only a
> temporary pkgbuild fixing dcron. thank you, jose
>
> Comment by: giddie on Thu, 05 May 2011 11:08:06 +
>
> Anyone using this package should now switch back to dcr
在 2012年2月19日 下午5:52，Alireza Savand 写道：
> Now it seems logical, so if they provides same pkg name on the system,
> yes these pkgs names have to change in the proper way
>
>
> 2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng)
>
>> 在 2012年2月19日 上午5:56，Alireza Savand 写道：
>> > The p
在 2012年2月19日 上午5:56，Alireza Savand 写道：
> The projects names are same to the aur pkg's names, it's better
> to mention the diffrents in PKGBUILD's pkgdesc, not to change the aur names!
>
> 2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng)
>
>> 2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng)
2012/2/18 Stefan Husmann :
> Am 16.02.2012 23:04, schrieb 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng):
>
>> I realize there are two AUR uploader helper, aurploader[1] and
>> burp[2]？Which one is you guys using? What's the pro and con?
>>
>> Thank you
>> Techlive Zheng
>>
&
2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) :
> In AUR, there are two svn2git packages, [svn2git][1] and [svn2git-git][2].
>
> At first, I thought that the later one is the git version of the
> first,then it turns out that they are to different packages.
>
> The first one is Kevin Men
In AUR, there are two svn2git packages, [svn2git][1] and [svn2git-git][2].
At first, I thought that the later one is the git version of the
first,then it turns out that they are to different packages.
The first one is Kevin Menard's ruby version, accturally a ruby gem.
Here is the project page: h
2012/2/19 Alireza Savand :
> Can i access to PKGBUILD git repo directly?
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Julien Nicoulaud <
> julien.nicoul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, I reverted the "stan" package and orphaned it again. Hopefully no
>> user of this package has upgraded in the meanwhil
This is interesting on googlefight,check it out.
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=burp&word2=aurploader
2012/2/17 Cédric Girard :
> 2012/2/17 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng)
>
>> You mean that aurploader can not keep username and passname in config file?
>
>
2012/2/17 SanskritFritz :
> 2012/2/17 Cédric Girard :
>> 2012/2/17 Alireza Savand
>>
>>> For downloading yes of course it's nice to have one like yaourt, but for
>>> uploading it's little bit useless.
>>>
>>
>> No, it's really useful when you are updating your PKGBUILD on an headless
>> server.
>
2012/2/17 Mike Sampson :
> 2012/2/17 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) :
>> I realize there are two AUR uploader helper, aurploader[1] and
>> burp[2]？Which one is you guys using? What's the pro and con?
>>
> [snip]
>
> I was using aurploader until recently but gave burp a g
2012/2/17 Axilleas P :
> 2012/2/17 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng)
>
>> I realize there are two AUR uploader helper, aurploader[1] and
>> burp[2]？Which one is you guys using? What's the pro and con?
>>
>> Thank you
>> Techlive Zheng
>>
>> [1]:https:/
I realize there are two AUR uploader helper, aurploader[1] and
burp[2]？Which one is you guys using? What's the pro and con?
Thank you
Techlive Zheng
[1]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23393
[2]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37216
aircrack-ng-cuda is acctually a svn package, so I rename it to
aircrack-ng-cuda-svn and uploaded, please merge aircrack-ng-cuda to
aircrack-ng-cuda-svn.
aircrack-ng-cuda:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30958
aircrack-ng-cuda-svn:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56686
airdrop-ng and airgraph-ng is duplicated with aircrack-ng-scripts in community.
aircrack-ptw has been included into aircrack-ng since version 0.9, and
the source link in PKGBUILD has down.
airdrop-ng:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41584
airgraph-ng:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.ph
bingo
在 2011-12-25 上午3:13，"Gustavo Genovese" 写道：
>
> 2011/12/24 Florian Pritz :
> > On 24.12.2011 19:16, Gustavo Genovese wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I've adopted this package
> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18644 (firefox32) some time
> >> ago and I think it should be renamed to bin32-fire
2011/12/25 Florian Pritz :
> On 24.12.2011 19:16, Gustavo Genovese wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I've adopted this package
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18644 (firefox32) some time
>> ago and I think it should be renamed to bin32-firefox. Can you do this
>> for me? Or should I just change the nam
2011/12/25 Angel Velásquez :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 24/12/11 12:08, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:37:22 +0800 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng)
>> wrote:
>>
>>> All Arch Linuxer,
>>>
>>> Merry Chri
All Arch Linuxer,
Merry Christmas,have a nice holiday!
There are two PKGBUILDs of google-musicmanager:
[google-musicmanager]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50891
[google-musicmanager-beta]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54155
My opinion is to delete the google-musicmanager-beta.
Google only provide one downloadable version of
[run_bin32_gtk][1] uses deprecated lib32 directory
(/opt/lib32/usr/lib) and has not updated and required since its first
submission,so I think it is okey to delete it.
[1]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27419
Should the following packages have a name changing to make it more standard?
[firefox32][1] --> bin32-firefox
[firefox32-i18n][2] --> bin32-firefox-i18n
Or else,is there a bin32 or lib32 naming standard recommended,I didn't
not find anything mentioned this in Arch Wiki Page.
[1]:https://aur.arch
That is all right,probably I was not explained my self well as I am a
Chinese needed more english expression practicing.
在 2011-12-20 上午1:36，"Dave Reisner" 写道：
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 01:02:00AM +0800, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
> > 2011/12/20 Dave Reisner :
> > > O
2011/12/20 Dave Reisner :
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:40:57AM +0800, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
>> Recently,I was attracted by the songbird and nightingage media player
>> based on Mozilla Tech.And I noticed these to nightly build PKGBUILD in
>> AUR whose pkgver is part of a
Recently,I was attracted by the songbird and nightingage media player
based on Mozilla Tech.And I noticed these to nightly build PKGBUILD in
AUR whose pkgver is part of a shell command string,and I want to do
something to make that pkgver recognised by the AUR interface.
Anyone who can tell me how
[gstreamer0.10-python-songbird][1]
This should be deleted. It's out of date, and also useless.
[1]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27875
Should we provide an email login?
在 2011-12-17 下午8:17，"Mikkel Kristianse" 写道：
>
> Hi
> I have the same problem Edoardo had and I would like to be able to use my
AUR account again, so I hope I can get my login.
> Thanks!
> /Mikkel
44 matches
Mail list logo
