On 8/18/18 3:30 AM, Daniel YC Lin via aur-general wrote:
> I guest the TU's workload may be calculated by
> a. How many packages which he owns.
> b. How many commits during a past year
> c. How many bugs required to solved?
>
> To print out by graph maybe interesting.
> These may be calculated by
On 18.01.2018 22:11, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 01/18/2018 04:05 PM, Thorsten Toepper wrote:
>> First of all: Congratulations for becoming a TU, you should have applied
>> sooner so I could've given you my "yes". :-)
>
> Thanks! :)
>
&g
On 18.01.2018 02:11, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 01/17/2018 06:18 PM, Thorsten Toepper wrote:
>> I'm no longer a TU so I can't see how active both speps and faidoc have
>> been regarding participation in the votes. Yet the TU-Bylaws are pretty
>> strict
On 18.01.2018 01:43, Balló György via aur-general wrote:
> On 18.01.2018 00.18, Thorsten Toepper via aur-general wrote:
>> Therefore the second requirement, to NOT do any special action on the
>> AUR requiring TU privileges is not fulfilled, as participating in
>> votes is ex
On 17.01.2018 19:51, Balló György via aur-general wrote:
> The voting is over. Results:
>
> Yes: 33
> No: 5
> Abstain: 5
>
> This means that speps is no longer a Trusted User.
>
> --
> György Balló
> Trusted User
>
I'm no longer a TU so I can't see how active both speps and faidoc have
been r
Hello,
Over the last couple of months other things in live got higher priority
and the amount of time I'm able to invest into Arch Linux shrinks. So
after several years I now step down from my post as a TU.
I only maintain a small number of packages and for most there are rarely
new releases upst
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 13:33:39 + (GMT)
Mark Foxwell wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The linux-wbfs-manager package in AUR
> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29128) has been out of date
> for 3 months and has been flagged as out of date for ages too. I have
> emailed the maintainer (eirik) with t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Hello,
please delete libobjfw-hg[1] as it has been renamed to objfw-hg[2].
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26689
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31906
Greetings
Thorsten Töpper / Atsutane
- --
Jabber: atsut...@freethough
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:31:13 +0800
Ray Rashif wrote:
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19507 - renamed to ffado
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19112 - renamed to ffado-svn
>
> (there's no need for a reply, just delete them)
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Hello,
I think the acer_acpi package can be removed from the AUR as it is
included in the kernel since 2.6.25(stated in the comments), though
the current minumum kernel version of Arch is 2.6.24.5 I don't think
that laptop Users run this old kernel.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Am Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:09:33 +0600
schrieb Anton Bazhenov :
> 2009/9/27 Loui Chang
>
> > You might consider applying as a TU if you're interested in helping
> > clean up the AUR.
> >
> >
> Yes, it would be interesting. And what should I do for thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
ProfessorTomoe wrote:
> I'm using x86_64, and I can download it from pacman -Sw lib32-libx11.
> However, when I get on the AUR **web** page and do a search for it, it's
> not there at all.
>
> Any ideas why? Do we have an AUR bug here?
Yes, the AU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
jezra wrote:
> Unfortunately, after renaming the package and the compiled binary, I
> needed to edit and rename the man page and the associated help
> directives in the source code to reflect the changes to the package
> and binary name. Since I don'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
jezra wrote:
> There is indeed a conflict of /usr/bin/sap. What is the best way to
> proceed in a situation such as this? Should I rename my binary or
> should I just put the name of the conflicting binary into "conflicts"?
You should also rename yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Abhishek Dasgupta wrote:
| 2009/7/6 Ray Kohler :
|> Is there actually a feed that shows all updates, and not just new
packages?
|> The obvious one on the AUR main page only shows new packages.
|>
|
| http://aur.archlinux.org/rss2.php shows all updat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Hello,
I think "warsaw"[1] can be removed as it seems to be a misspelled
duplicate of "warsow"[2].
Regards
Thorsten
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27701
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2679
- --
Jabber: atsut...@freethou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Stefan Husmann wrote:
| Angel Velásquez schrieb:
|> Why don't disown all packages at one time? and people will take care
|> of adopt them, and let this thread die?
|>
|> Thanks
|>
| I just had the same idea. Any objections?
Yes, now you are able to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Hello,
the gajim development has switched from subversion to mercurial, so
gajim-svn[1] has been succeeded by gajim-hg[2].
[1]http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4047
[2]http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27152
Kind regards
Thorsten / A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Hello,
Again it seems that someone couldn't wait for his mirror to sync and
uploaded a duplicate of conky:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21974
Greetings
Atsutane
- --
Jabber: atsut...@freethoughts.de
Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Hello,
the new "dofus_new"[1] package is an updated duplicate of the "dofus"
package, I suggest to delete [1] and orphan[2].
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26098
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11950
Kind regards,
Atsut
20 matches
Mail list logo
