On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 08:27:11 +, Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got a weird issue with sha256sum behaviour. When creating the package
> with makepkg --geninteg I get a hash and when trying to build it with
> makepkg the hash fails. The interesting bit is
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 10:52:36 +1200, Holger Jahn wrote:
> > The AUR does not provide source code hosting, on the grounds that other
> > places like Github, Gitlab, git.sr.ht, amd so on are doing it better.
> > Moreover, source code hosting is a resource burden on the provider,
> > which in our
Hello
Would somebody please take a look at this one? Thank you!
https://aur.archlinux.org/account/philipjoy6
Best,
Tinu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 16:16:27 +0200, Tinu Weber wrote:
> I guess for the mortals among us, the best/cleanest way is to bump the
> pkgVER (as pointed out by LoneVVolf [2]), and stop attributing any sort
> of semantic meaning (upstream/downstream) to the pkgrel?
… or, well, judging
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 07:27:21 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 10/22/18 5:47 AM, Tinu Weber wrote:
> > Ah, indeed. I'm sorry, I should've tested with makepkg.
> >
> > More generally, however, what would be the best approach to applying
> > downs
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 21:01:56 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 10/20/18 7:51 AM, Tinu Weber wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 12:11:04 +0100, Jonathon Fernyhough wrote:
> >> On 20/10/2018 03:05, hagar wrote:
> >>> Because of the Maintainers incre
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 12:11:04 +0100, Jonathon Fernyhough wrote:
> On 20/10/2018 03:05, hagar wrote:
> > Because of the Maintainers increasing pkgrel I was considering
> > increasing the pkgrel by 0.01 each new build.
> >
> > This would allow for 99 subsequent builds on each pkgrel.
> >
> >
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 15:48:31 +0200, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote:
> > makedepends=('make')
>
> `make` is present in `base-devel` thus shouldn't be a listed dependency.
> Unsure
> if its however worth listing it as it's the only needed build-time dependency?
As it is a git package
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 14:16:23 +, Kyle McNally via aur-general wrote:
> I recently became the co-maintainer of the plex-sub-zero package [1]. I
> pushed to it's repo, but the
> version isn't being updated on the AUR. Should the AUR update when I push,
> or does the maintainer need to do
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 09:19:43 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 06:47:07 +, Xyne wrote:
> >A bash script should depend only on bash.
>
> Hi Xyne,
>
> Seems to be better it would depend on coreutilsor do you asume a bash
> script only depends on bash intern commands and
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 18:25:17 +0100, Florian Pritz wrote:
> On 12.02.2016 10:45, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Take a look at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yaourt/ , some body
> > add real spam to the comments and another user commented the spam:
>
> Thanks for reporting this. It appears that
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 17:43:31 +0100, Ole Jon Bjørkum wrote:
> I fear people will complain the package is not working, that's just
> it.
Then those people should read up on how packages are handled on Arch
Linux.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
12 matches
Mail list logo
