ot;reader" in this list, but I though I'll contribute my
two cents: maybe the (currently missing) procedure for deleting
packages should stipulate that the same TU cannot submit deletion
request and then act on it. Can this be enforced in the software?
Assuming ordinary users cannot a
a voting period
I'm not a TU, but can I suggest replacing "for example" with "such
as"? "such as... but not including" sounds nicer.
--
Vanush "Misha" Paturyan
Senior Technical Officer
Room 120
Computer Science Department
Eolas Bulding
Maynooth Univ
ommie/#xWcSmoLX
>
> I'm frankly stunned…
>
What if you stick a "set -x" just before the build() declaration in the
PKGBUILD (that would generate a much bigger output, but might shed some light
on what exactly is going on with your system).
Misha.
---
Vanush "Misha
85963010459f25424a334c4bdf5d10f9619415908564faa282f726913ba3eba8a498f0ec9e286181540d2')
+sha512sums=('61e921a425f16b3fd12961533a5e2ec790d7d80e06d98a837156693082dd8254dfb9840498ce8e561924fb8c5241e9934e9cb1e7b7f1f8caef3cbd8edfae4af7')
build() {
# Generate the style files.
--
2.11.0
---
Vanush "Misha" Paturyan
Senior Technical Officer
Room 120
Computer Science Department
EOLAS Building
Maynooth University
Maynooth
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
s gmail's "feature" not to show
you your own emails that are coming back via mailing lists. I was
investigating similar complain by a gmail user that he does not
receive his own emails via mailing list, and my conclusion was gmail
silently deletes them.
Hope this helps
Misha.
--
differently. I think it makes sence to have one PKGBUILD
that can procude different packages, and they have to conflict with
each other to make sure someone does not install both at the same
time. If tools cannot handle it then tools should be modified to allow
for this workflow.
just my two cents.
Misha
--
Vanush "Misha" Paturyan
Senior Technical Officer
Room 120
Computer Science Department
Eolas Bulding
Maynooth University
Maynooth
ext: 4539
Hi All,
while searching for Bacula (http://www.bacula.org) in AUR I found two
conflicting packages: bacula, version 7.2.0-2, maintained by maleckii,
and bacula-client, version 7.4.0-1, maintained by eworm. At a quick
glance it looks like bacula-client provides bacula-fd binary package
from bacula
