Re: [aur-general] Upstream version numbers that break pacman version comparison

2016-11-21 Thread brent timothy saner via aur-general
On 11/22/2016 02:53 AM, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: (SNIP) > What is the best solution to deal with this? I think I can either map the > scheme to a more reasonable one (e.g. "8.5.pl3" instead of "8.5pl3"), or > bump the epoch when needed. > what i'd recommend is instead use 8.5 -> 8.5.1 -> 8.5.2 a

Re: [aur-general] Upstream version numbers that break pacman version comparison

2016-11-22 Thread brent timothy saner via aur-general
On 11/22/2016 03:07 AM, Bennett Piater wrote: > > > On 11/22/2016 08:58 AM, brent timothy saner via aur-general wrote: >> what i'd recommend is instead use 8.5 -> 8.5.1 -> 8.5.2 >> >> and then have a _pkgver= variable with the actual string, if it's

[aur-general] pending merge request for python-git/python-gitpython, please cancel

2017-02-13 Thread brent timothy saner via aur-general
i requested a merge of python-gitpython into python-git THIS SHOULD BE CANCELED. They need to be separate packages. they are for different things. PRQ # is 7484 Sorry for the confusion signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature