!
Thanks,
Allan
okay, i'm not usually one to break my lurk for the sake of '+1', but
holy crap!
that's a reduction by damned-near an order of magnitude. rock the fuck
on, y'all.
-kludge
/002790.html
some choice reading there!
-kludge
Mathias Burén wrote:
base-devel is a group which includes patch, make etc.
2009/4/7 Angel Velásquez an...@archlinux.com.ve
You don't need to depend on automake because it's in base-devel
I said make, I've installed (office machine) with the FTP image, and
I don't had make :o, and neither
promotion to [extra]?
-kludge
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 5:07 PM, kludge drklu...@rat-patrol.org wrote:
Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 02:39:38PM -0600, kludge wrote:
IMO votes are no more needed on packages in repostories, neither any
dividing into categories usig tags.
Looking
Loui Chang wrote:
snip /
There's no point in writing novels if it's just fantasy.
unless you're tolkien, eddings, leguin, etc., etc. :b
Callan Barrett wrote:
2008/12/5 kludge [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=60262
Just a tip: you might as well type weechat instead of using sed. I
imagine it's unlikely the project changes its name and the PKGBUILD
would be trivial to change anyway..
yr right
, but i feel that, sometimes, now is not better than better.
in the meantime, it seems that moving all the games out of [community]
and into [games] is one concrete and non-controversial way to take some
load off the server.
sorry to go on at length, especially as i'm not even a tu.
yrs,
kludge
into smaller groups that
can be self-managing without those structures.
rant type=anarcho_nerd
dog, we're gonna have to change the subject-line *again*!
-kludge
is not better than better.
but on that note, i'm going to withdraw here, having said way more than
my piece given that i'm *not* developing anything.
-kludge
]. there is an outstanding and unanswered concern with the
accuracy of those metrics. it seems to me that folks will not be happy
with the proposal until that concern is resolved. so can anyone either
(concretely) answer that concern or (concretely) propose better metrics?
-kludge
p.s: i'm
should i include them in the source= array and provide md5 sums for them?
-kludge
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=60262
and iananpoa (n_on-p_rofit
o_rganization a_adminstrator).
also, if this dicussion goes any further, it should probably move to
arch general or the forum.
-kludge
kludge wrote:
Loui Chang wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 10:15:23PM +0100, Kristoffer Fossgård wrote:
Why is package popularity judged by votes anyway? I never vote. The
reason i never vote is because i don't understand why package
popularity can't simply be judged by download count.
Votes
15 matches
Mail list logo
