Re: [aur-general] Should we recommend removing comments from the AUR?

2014-12-02 Thread mrlemux
I think that a bug tracker would be the best solution, and i see removing comments just as a temporary, hacky solution. as comments are just used for bug tracking anyway. (so we can just replace the comments block below the AUR package with the bug tracker) But if we change it, it should be build

Re: [aur-general] AUR GIT and Bug Tracker

2014-08-19 Thread mrlemux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/19/2014 11:18 AM, carstene1ns wrote: > Am 18.08.2014 um 10:01 schrieb mrle...@gmail.com: >> the problem is that most issue tracking systems are too heavy for >> our uses(correct me if i'm wrong), and if we want it really KISS >> we have to imple

Re: [aur-general] AUR GIT and Bug Tracker

2014-08-19 Thread mrlemux
We could also have a development area(like this) for the AUR that isn't integrated into the main GUI(aur.archlinux.org) and replace the request button with a link to the devolepment area On 08/19/2014 12:15 AM, Massimiliano Torromeo wrote: > At work I did setup gitlab community edition [1] on our

Re: [aur-general] AUR GIT and Bug Tracker

2014-08-18 Thread mrlemux
On 08/18/2014 12:57 AM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 at 00:21:41, Ido Rosen wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Johannes Löthberg >> wrote: >>> On 17/08, Ido Rosen wrote: On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > * Dynamically con

[aur-general] AUR GIT and Bug Tracker

2014-08-17 Thread mrlemux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, i heard that something like a bug tracker/GIT for the packages in AUR is planned, and i've become curious how the state of it is -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT8MlfAAoJEBWTDgtqAPQNRN4H/35h+X+KByf3rpgD19vP