[aur-general] Another spam account in AUR

Hello, are UN ambassadors and hollywood actresses using Arch and comment on AUR? Maybe they do, but this one only spams: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/angelina Please delete and ban. Best Regards Stefan 

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD git remote branch issue

>Is there an easy way to do it? >Regards, >Ralf source=('claws-mail::git://git.claws-mail.org/#branch=gtk3')

Re: [aur-general] Split packages

>-Original-Nachricht- >Betreff: Re: [aur-general] Split packages >Datum: 2016-08-23T11:26:07+0200 >Von: "Levente Polyak" >An: "aur-general@archlinux.org" >On 08/22/2016 01:58 PM, stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: >> In my opinion, already t

Re: [aur-general] Split packages

> >Hi all, > >Christoph Gysin came up with the problem of split packages that conflict >each other, which is implementable in a PKGBUILD. > >As an example consider >https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=pasystray which >defines pasystray and pasystray-gtk2 which cannot be instal

Re: [aur-general] AUR airvpn-portable changes files in userfolders, DO NOT INSTALL

-Original-Nachricht- Betreff: Re: [aur-general] AUR airvpn-portable changes files in userfolders, DO NOT INSTALL Datum: 2016-03-30T17:13:15+0200 Von: "William Di Luigi" An: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" But is deleting the package really the best route? Why not let

Re: [aur-general] package deleting request barpanel

-Original Message- > Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:34:08 +0200 > Subject: [aur-general] package deleting request barpanel > From: jwbirdsong > To: "(AUR)" > barpanel http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16971 > Last updated 14 Mar 2009.  sources *seem* unavailable.  didn't search > REAL

Re: [aur-general] [request] delete modeller-deb

-Original Message- > Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:04:27 +0200 > Subject: [aur-general]  [request] delete modeller-deb > From: Yerko Escalona > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Hi > > Please delete modeller-deb > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35062) because is a > duplicate of m

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Thomas Dziedzic

-Original Message- > Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:31:25 +0200 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] TU application for Thomas Dziedzic > From: Xyne > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Stefan Husmann wrote: > > > well, sage-mathematics is not a package, it is a distribution (btw, > > do you know scila

Re: [aur-general] Please delete my package "gobby-d ev"

-Original Message- > Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:19:04 +0200 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Please delete my package "gobby-dev" > From: Angel Velásquez > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase > wrote: > > On 04.06.201

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for django - orphaned and out-of-date

-Original Message- > Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 09:40:56 +0200 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for django - orphaned and > out-of-date > From: "stefan-husm...@t-online.de" > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository \(AUR\)" > > >

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for django - orphaned and out-of-date

-Original Message- > Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 08:38:54 +0200 > Subject: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for django - orphaned and out-of-date > From: Puneeth Chaganti > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > Hello, > > The django package [extra/django 1.1.1-4] is out-of-date an

Re: [aur-general] remove package: pyopt

-Original Message- > Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:15:36 +0200 > Subject: [aur-general] remove package: pyopt > From: Chris Baker > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > It's very outdated and nobody ever used it anyway. > > Chris > No, it is not even flagged out of da

Re: [aur-general] Removal package request

-Original Message- > Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:16:01 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Removal package request > From: Moritz Rudert > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > kernel26grsecurity - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12181 is > a duplicate of kernel26-

Re: [aur-general] Please orphan hamachi

-Original Message- > Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:56:18 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Please orphan hamachi > From: Lauri Niskanen > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Hamachi package in AUR [1] has been marked out-of-date for a very long > time. It needs a little fix on the PKGBUILD. The mai

Re: [aur-general] Request to remove kdeplasma-atheist -quote

-Original Message- > Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:00:35 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Request to remove kdeplasma-atheist-quote > From: Final Crisis > To: > > Hello, > > First and foremost, sorry if this isn't the right place or way to do > this, as I've never done it before, but I reca

Re: [aur-general] Package removal

-Original Message- > Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:40:15 +0200 > Subject: [aur-general] Package removal > From: Anton Bazhenov > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Hello! I noticed several packages in AUR that are likely to be > removed. > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13719 > F-S

Re: [aur-general] Community orphans - Was: discussi on about arora-git

-Original Message- > Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:43:20 +0200 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Community orphans - Was: discussion about > arora-git > From: Andrea Scarpino > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > On 15/09/2009, Allan McRae wrote: > > There are currently 59

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

-Original Message- > Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 13:39:06 +0200 > Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request > From: Tomás Acauan Schertel > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > Hi. > > Could someone delete these packages? > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4238

Re: [aur-general] Adoption of community package 'mo nit'

-Original Message- > Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:08:45 +0200 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Adoption of community package 'monit' > From: Andrea Scarpino > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > On 07/09/2009, Ronald van Haren wrote: > > I think not everyone has adopted

[aur-general] Inactivity (involuntarily)

Hello, my phone and (more important) ADSL connection at home does not work, so I cannot connect to the net with my archlinux boxes. I hope this will be fixed soon, but now it leads to a unvoluntary inactivity. Regards Stefan

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

-Original Message- > Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:37:06 +0200 > Subject: [aur-general] Delete request > From: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > Hi > > Please delete this package 'timeout': > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24299 >

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

-Original Message- > Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:23:45 +0200 > Subject: [aur-general] Package deletion request > From: H.Gökhan SARI > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Hello, > I have packages gtk-imajdotat[0], > imaj.at[1], > imaj.at terminal

Re: [aur-general] deletion request

-Original Message- > Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:39:40 +0200 > Subject: [aur-general]  deletion request > From: F B > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > > Hi, > could a TU delete this package? > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6557 It doesn't build anymore > and it has been replaced

Re: [aur-general] applications wants to use /var/log

-Original Message- > Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:22:13 +0200 > Subject: [aur-general] applications wants to use /var/log > From: "nathan owe." > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > I am making a package for MyServer app. it is giving error > "/bin/install: cannot change permissions of `/var/lo

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning of 44 packages

G_Syme schrieb: > Hi fellow listmates, > > in trying to make a long story short: > I've finally switched from KDE3 to KDE4, and not directly via Arch, but on a parallelly installed Kubuntu with shared home partition. The result is, that the Kubuntu installation (which was previously only intended

[aur-general] Package merge

Hello, I merged elisa-base and elisa-plugins to a new package named elisa. The reason for doing so is that not only elisa-plugins depend on elisa-base, but also vice versa. I also deleted twisted-web2, because it is a double of the twisted pckage in [extra] now. Regards Stefan

Re: [aur-general] seamonkey-nightly

-Original Message- > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:55:23 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] seamonkey-nightly > From: Tai Chi Minh Ralph Eastwood > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Hi, > > The seamonkey-nightly package in the aur seems to be out of date and > not updated for a long while. Can it

Re: [aur-general] seamonkey-nightly

-Original Message- > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:55:23 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] seamonkey-nightly > From: Tai Chi Minh Ralph Eastwood > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Hi, > > The seamonkey-nightly package in the aur seems to be out of date and > not updated for a long while. Can it

[aur-general] Gnomesword renamed do Xiphos

Hello, since the most recent update the popular bible study software gnomesword changed it's name to xiphos. Gnomesword has 40 votes and has been orphaned by the long standing maintainer. So now I would like to move xiphos to community. Any objections? Regards Stefan

[aur-general] Re: why my package was deleted ?

Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi schrieb: > Hi > > I make a package "perl-ack" and was delete without any > reason/notification. I guess it was because they thought it was a > duplicate of the "unsupported/ack" but this is not true. > The "unsupported/ack" only contains a standalone "ack", without any perl

Re: [aur-general] Remove perl-pogl*

-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:39:00 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Remove perl-pogl* > From: Micael Soder > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Hi, need the following packages removed > perl-pogl - perl-pogl-image -perl-pogl-shader. > > did accidently submit the old tar fil

Re: [aur-general] removal request

-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:50:27 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] removal request > From: Jakub Schmidtke > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > > I think those packages I just orphaned could be deleted, since they > are probably not used anymore: > > http://aur.archlinux.

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning request

-Original Message- > Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:02:57 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Orphaning request > From: Christoph Zeiler > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Could some TU please orphan the packages owned by user nasenbaer? > Half of them is flagged outdated, latest package upload was

Re: [aur-general] moreutils in community

-Original Message- > Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:37:42 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] moreutils in community > From: Sergej Pupykin > To: "stefan-husma...@t-online.de" > > > s> according to the recent proposal (see > > s> > > http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-Decemb

[aur-general] moreutils in community

Hello, according to the recent proposal (see http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-December/003207.html) there should not be packages added to community with less than 10 votes or less than 1% in pkgstats. The new package moreutils violates this. So what is to do now? Regards

Re: [aur-general] I can't update or upload packages in AUR

-Original Message- > Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:24:00 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] I can't update or upload packages in AUR > From: Loui Chang > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 07:12:51PM +1930, José Valecillos wrote: > > Hello, I h

Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR

-Original Message- > Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:54:48 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR > From: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > > Please see these packages, it contains a builded packa

Re: [aur-general] Discussion regarding TU Swiergot

-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:24:22 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Discussion regarding TU Swiergot > From: M Rawash > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 13:51 -0500, Ghost1227 wrote: > > Over the last few months, I have

Re: [aur-general] orphan request

-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:58:28 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] orphan request > From: Ian Taylor > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Could you please orphan autossh so that I may adopt it? > > The package has been out-of-date for quite some time. I tried to > contact

Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR

-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:50:18 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR > From: Daenyth Blank > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:19, Loui Chang > wrote: > > Where are you seeing 'poop'? > > > > >

Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR

-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:39:27 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR > From: Aaron Griffin > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:36 PM, stefan-husm...@t-online.de >

Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR

-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:19:36 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR > From: Loui Chang > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:03:50AM +0100, stefan-husm...@t-online.d

Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR

-Original Message- > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:16:28 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR > From: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > Please see these packages, it contains a builded packages, binaries > and some sources. > >

Re: [aur-general] Remove packages: quarter-svn, q uarter-svn-doc

-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:36:28 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Remove packages: quarter-svn, quarter-svn-doc > From: Michele Mocciola > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Please, remove packages quarter-svn and quarter-svn-doc. Recently the > first stable version was re

Re: [aur-general] removal request

In your first post the replacing package had a 7 at the end, http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23827 -Original Message- > Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:28:26 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] removal request > From: Grigorios Bouzakis > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning request

-Original Message- > Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:48:44 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Orphaning request > From: "Dr4g0*" > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Could a TU please orphan the package hwinfo from user champus? The > named application hasn't been updated for a year and there are > s

Re: [aur-general] Deprecated packages

-Original Message- > Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:50:32 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Deprecated packages > From: Sébastien Piccand > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Hi all, > > I used to take care of the following packages: > libzzub, libzzub-svn, pyzzub, pyzzub-svn > They are now deprec

Re: [aur-general] Deprecated packages

-Original Message- > Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:50:32 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Deprecated packages > From: Sébastien Piccand > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Hi all, > > I used to take care of the following packages: > libzzub, libzzub-svn, pyzzub, pyzzub-svn > They are now deprec

Re: [aur-general] package removal request

-Original Message- > Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 03:11:39 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] package removal request > From: Grigorios Bouzakis > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 04:08:48AM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20

[aur-general] Orphaned Community packages

Hello, there are 23 orphaned packages in community, some are dependencies of other community packages. (comments by me) cat. name version votes description (comment) - games

Re: [aur-general] Community and the AUR (Was: Vot e - Moving [community] to use same system as main rep os)

-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:59:10 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Community and the AUR (Was: Vote - Moving > [community] to use same system as main repos) > From: Allan McRae > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > Loui Chang wrote: > > On Sat, Jan

Re: [aur-general] lha removing request

-Original Message- > Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:47:42 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] lha removing request > From: ? ??? > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > Hi, > > I occasionally uploaded package which already in [extra] > http://aur.archlinux.org/package

Re: [aur-general] Vote - Moving [community] to us e same system as main repos

-Original Message- > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:20:03 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Vote - Moving [community] to use same > system as main repos > From: Loui Chang > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 08:34:28AM +0100, Geoffroy Carr

Re: [aur-general] Package removal

-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:04:07 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Package removal > From: Florian Pritz > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Please remove http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?

Re: [aur-general] packages to update

-Original Message- > Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:06:32 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] packages to update > From: "stefan-husm...@t-online.de" > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository \(AUR\)" > > > -Original Message-

Re: [aur-general] Orphans packages list

-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:23:59 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Orphans packages list > From: "Andrea Scarpino" > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > Hi TUs, > now that I'm a DEV I'll help Pierre with KDE maintenance, so I prefer > to have not p

Re: [aur-general] packages to update

-Original Message- > Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:52:01 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] packages to update > From: Ghost1227 > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > Thomas SARBONI wrote: > > Hello all. > > > > Can somedody update these packages: > > > > -haxe > > -

Re: [aur-general] Removal of x86_64-specific and op era flashplugin packages

-Original Message- > Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:08:31 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Removal of x86_64-specific and opera > flashplugin packages > From: Evangelos Foutras > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > Hello fellow TUs, > > I have come across people who pick

Re: [aur-general] The search engine needs improvement s

-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:09:39 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] The search engine needs improvements > From: Pierre Chapuis > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Le Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:55:39 +0100, > Xavier a écrit : > > > But then again, rar is probably a corner ca

Re: [aur-general] Discussion period - Moving [commu nity] to use same system as main repos

Hello again, > This was intended to be a serious question. It's easy to say "oh, I > don't like that", but I'd like to know why. I want you to _convince_ > me. Proof, examples, etc etc > Browse the AUR comment pages. See how people are advised by TUs or other users to do things better. This kind

Re: [aur-general] Discussion period - Moving [commu nity] to use same system as main repos

-Original Message- > Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:09:30 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Discussion period - Moving [community] to > use same system as main repos > From: "Aaron Griffin" > To: "AUR general" > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:41 PM, stefan

Re: [aur-general] Discussion period - Moving [commu nity] to use same system as main repos

-Original Message- > Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:25:48 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Discussion period - Moving [community] to > use same system as main repos > From: "Aaron Griffin" > To: "stefan-husm...@t-online.de" , > "Discussion abo

Re: [aur-general] Discussion period - Moving [commu nity] to use same system as main repos

-Original Message- > Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:33:38 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Discussion period - Moving [community] to use > same system as main repos > From: Allan McRae > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > Hi all, > > To get this moving along, I would li

Re: [aur-general] Proposal: package's votes

-Original Message- > Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:16:26 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Proposal: package's votes > From: Evangelos Foutras > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > Vitaliy Berdinskikh wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I propose to make package's votes equal

[aur-general] the future of empathy, libtelepa thy..

Hello, there has been a thread on aur-general in October 2008 about this issue, but the situation is not satisfying IMHO: We have a package of empathe in AUR _and_ in [testing].Both are or were orphaned, and the package in AUR was taken by a user and upgraded to version 2.25. I was chatting with

Re: [aur-general] Duplicite package

-Original Message- > Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:55:28 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Duplicite package > From: Alois Ne?por > To: AUR general > Please, delete this package, are duplicite. > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7275 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22498

Re: [aur-general] Package removal

-Original Message- > Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:48:04 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Package removal > From: Jens Maucher > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Hi all > Once again i found two package that are the same. > > perl6-pugs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13327 > pugs http

Re: [aur-general] please remove a couple packages of mine

-Original Message- > Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:04:23 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] please remove a couple packages of mine > From: "merp boop" > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > I'm writing this based on this thread: > http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=468172#p468172 [1] > > I

Re: [aur-general] Package removal

-Original Message- > Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:06:08 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Package removal > From: Jens Maucher > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Please remove > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22415 > > It's a double from > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29

Re: [aur-general] Codeblocks vanished from AUR

-Original Message- > Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:18:28 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Codeblocks vanished from AUR > From: Loui Chang > To: "stefan-husm...@t-online.de" , > "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > On Mon, Dec

[aur-general] Codeblocks vanished from AUR

Hello, the package codeblocks I maintain in Community vanished. I am quite sure this happened not long ago, maybe yesterday ore the day before. The x86_64 package still shows up on Pierre's package list on archlinux.de, but the i686 package does not. Also the AUR comment page is gone. Now someo

Re: [aur-general] Packages

-Original Message- > Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:02:06 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Packages > From: "Imanol Celaya" > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Jens Maucher  wrote: >  Hello >  is flashplugin-mozilla > (http://a

Re: [aur-general] AUR Upgraded

-Original Message- > Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:41:56 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] AUR Upgraded > From: Loui Chang > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Hey everyone. I just upgraded the AUR web site. > If you run into any problems please let me know. > I'm also available on IRC as louipc.

Re: [aur-general] Resign as a TU

- Original Message (parts) - > > qcad > partlibrary > Adopted.

Re: [aur-general] Missing Packages

-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:07:39 +0200 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Missing Packages > From: "Ronald van Haren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] style="margin:0px;"> > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PRO