[aur-general] [Disownment Request]

2014-05-19 Thread Berno Strik
Can someone please disown https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dcp387c The maintainer agreed to disown, but I think he does not know his AUR username and password. Find the email conversation here-after. From: Berno Strik dutchma...@gmx.com (by way of Berno Strik dutchma...@gmx.com) To:

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request]

2014-05-19 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Monday 19 May 2014 20:09:21 Berno Strik wrote: Can someone please disown https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dcp387c The maintainer agreed to disown, but I think he does not know his AUR username and password. Find the email conversation here-after. Done, thank you. -- С уважением,

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request for package ejtagproxy-svn

2014-05-18 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Taylor Lookabaugh jesus.christ.i.l...@gmail.com wrote: On May 17, 2014 6:29 PM, David Manouchehri d...@32t.ca wrote: Maxime, I sent him an email on May 3rd, so it's been two weeks. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ejtagproxy-svn Just an FYI,

[aur-general] [Disownment Request] rhash

2014-05-18 Thread carstene1ns
Hello, please disown rhash[1] package, flagged 2014-02-22. I contacted Maintainer Red54 on 2014-05-02 and received no reply. Thanks! best regards, carstene1ns [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rhash/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request] rhash

2014-05-18 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Sunday 18 May 2014 22:22:01 carstene1ns wrote: Hello, please disown rhash[1] package, flagged 2014-02-22. I contacted Maintainer Red54 on 2014-05-02 and received no reply. Thanks! Done. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235

[aur-general] Disownment request for package ejtagproxy-svn

2014-05-17 Thread David Manouchehri
I sent Paul (paulburton89) an updated PKGBUILD for ejtagproxy-svn with a proper pkgver on May 3rd (at the moment it fails to build the newest version without manual intervention). I haven't heard back from him or seen the package updated since, therefore I am requesting to adopt it myself. David

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request for package ejtagproxy-svn

2014-05-17 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 4:33 AM, David Manouchehri d...@32t.ca wrote: I sent Paul (paulburton89) an updated PKGBUILD for ejtagproxy-svn with a proper pkgver on May 3rd (at the moment it fails to build the newest version without manual intervention). I haven't heard back from him or seen the

[aur-general] Disownment request for package ejtagproxy-svn

2014-05-17 Thread David Manouchehri
Maxime, I sent him an email on May 3rd, so it's been two weeks. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ejtagproxy-svn

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request for package ejtagproxy-svn

2014-05-17 Thread Taylor Lookabaugh
On May 17, 2014 6:29 PM, David Manouchehri d...@32t.ca wrote: Maxime, I sent him an email on May 3rd, so it's been two weeks. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ejtagproxy-svn Just an FYI, please do not start a new thread.

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request]

2014-05-15 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Wednesday 14 May 2014 23:07:01 Berno Strik wrote: Please disown package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flamerobin-git so that I can take over. The maintainer did not respond to any of the comments (first one on 2014-04-21, second one on 2014-04-29) and to the mail I send to him.

[aur-general] Disownment request: tomb

2014-05-14 Thread Rich
Hi, I'm requesting that the package tomb [1] be disowned so that I can adopt it. The package has been flagged out of date since 2014-01-27. I posted an updated PKGBUILD in the package comments on 2014-02-26. The current (out-of-date) package does not even build since the source URL returns

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: tomb

2014-05-14 Thread Doug Newgard
On 2014-05-14 01:47, Rich wrote: Hi, I'm requesting that the package tomb [1] be disowned so that I can adopt it. The package has been flagged out of date since 2014-01-27. I posted an updated PKGBUILD in the package comments on 2014-02-26. The current (out-of-date) package does not even

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: tomb

2014-05-14 Thread Rich
On 2014-05-14 1:37 am, Doug Newgard wrote: Current guidelines require you to attempt to contact the maintainer directly and wait two weeks. Have you attempted to email him at all? I just sent it. I'll update here if two weeks passes without a response. -- Rich

[aur-general] [Disownment Request]

2014-05-14 Thread Berno Strik
Please disown package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flamerobin-git so that I can take over. The maintainer did not respond to any of the comments (first one on 2014-04-21, second one on 2014-04-29) and to the mail I send to him. With Regards From: Berno Strik dutchma...@gmx.com To:

[aur-general] [Disownment request]

2014-05-12 Thread Berno Strik
On 29 of April I've contacted the maintainers of some brother-packages. They did not respond. (emails enclosed at the bottom). Can you please disown the following packages: [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl5250dn-cupswrapper [2]

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

2014-05-12 Thread Xyne
On 2014-05-12 22:13 +0200 Berno Strik wrote: On 29 of April I've contacted the maintainers of some brother-packages. They did not respond. (emails enclosed at the bottom). Can you please disown the following packages: [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl5250dn-cupswrapper [2]

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

2014-05-12 Thread Berno Strik
On 05/12/2014 10:29 PM, Xyne wrote: On 2014-05-12 22:13 +0200 Berno Strik wrote: On 29 of April I've contacted the maintainers of some brother-packages. They did not respond. (emails enclosed at the bottom). Can you please disown the following packages: [1]

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

2014-05-12 Thread Nowaker
Berno is doing a great job be refactoring all these old Brother packages. @Berno, Will you try to take over these dcp* packages and reupload them with proper? Some of them are already orphan, e.g. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dcp110c/ -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

2014-05-12 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Berno Strik dutchma...@gmx.com wrote: By joining I mean that I combine the cupswrapper and lpr packages into one new package. You can see examples of that if you look at the brother-packages owned by libernux Can you upload the new packages? I will happily

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

2014-05-12 Thread Berno Strik
On 05/12/2014 11:02 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Berno Strik dutchma...@gmx.com wrote: By joining I mean that I combine the cupswrapper and lpr packages into one new package. You can see examples of that if you look at the brother-packages owned by libernux Can

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

2014-05-12 Thread Berno Strik
On 05/12/2014 11:15 PM, Berno Strik wrote: On 05/12/2014 11:02 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Berno Strik dutchma...@gmx.com wrote: By joining I mean that I combine the cupswrapper and lpr packages into one new package. You can see examples of that if you look at

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

2014-05-12 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Berno Strik dutchma...@gmx.com wrote: Can you please merge, [1] and [2] into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl5250dn [3] and [4] into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-490cw [5] and [6] into

[aur-general] Disownment request: gtk2-aqd and gtk3-aqd

2014-05-09 Thread Giuseppe Borzi
Hello, I would like to request disownment of the packages gtk2-aqd [1] and gtk3-aqd [2] with intetion of taking over maintenance along with the already orphaned xfce4-macmenu-plugin [3]. Current maintainer did not respond to flagging the package out of date since 2013-07-04 for gtk2-aqd and

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: gtk2-aqd and gtk3-aqd

2014-05-09 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Friday 09 May 2014 20:17:05 Giuseppe Borzi wrote: I would like to request disownment of the packages gtk2-aqd [1] and gtk3-aqd [2] with intetion of taking over maintenance along with the already orphaned xfce4-macmenu-plugin [3]. Current maintainer did not respond to flagging the package

[aur-general] Disownment request: eclipse-aptana

2014-05-06 Thread Miodrag Tokić
Hi, I would like to request disownment of the package eclipse-aptana [1] with intetion of taking over maintenance. Current maintainer did not respond to flagging the package out of date since 2013-07-22 and is not reachable by email (Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender). I belive you can

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: eclipse-aptana

2014-05-06 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Miodrag Tokić m...@loonies.io wrote: Hi, I would like to request disownment of the package eclipse-aptana [1] with intetion of taking over maintenance. Current maintainer did not respond to flagging the package out of date since 2013-07-22 and is not

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: kdeplasma-applets-redshift

2014-03-31 Thread thecattony
Hi, any news about this? Still no response from the actual maintainer. Regards.

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: kdeplasma-applets-redshift

2014-03-31 Thread Connor Behan
On 31/03/14 03:11 PM, thecatt...@gmx.com wrote: Hi, any news about this? Still no response from the actual maintainer. Regards. Disowned, thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[aur-general] Disownment Request: kdeplasma-applets-redshift

2014-03-25 Thread thecattony
Hi, the package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeplasma-applets-redshift/ is outdated since more than a month. Send an email over a week ago with no response to the following addresses: a...@wall-dev.org 4k1r4.ru...@gmail.com Could you disown the package? As soon as it is available, I adopt

[aur-general] [Disownment Request] brother-mfc-230c

2014-03-15 Thread Berno Strik
Please disown [1] so that I can take over. I've contacted the maintainer but he did not respond. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-230c/

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request] brother-mfc-230c

2014-03-15 Thread Felix Yan
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 18:59:33 Berno Strik wrote: Please disown [1] so that I can take over. I've contacted the maintainer but he did not respond. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-230c/ Disowned, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: ingen-svn and related packages

2014-03-02 Thread prettyvanilla
On 03/02/2014 06:04 AM, speps wrote: [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ingen-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/raul-svn/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ganv-svn/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lilv-svn/ Disowned. Thanks, updated! [5]

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: pam_ssh

2014-03-01 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Saturday 01 March 2014 08:51:45 pancho horrillo wrote: I'd like to request the disownment of the package pam_ssh (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pam_ssh/) with the intention of taking over its maintainership. Current maintainer did not respond to Flag-out-of-date, comment and

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: pam_ssh

2014-03-01 Thread pancho horrillo
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 01:51:47PM +0400, Evgeniy Alekseev wrote: On Saturday 01 March 2014 08:51:45 pancho horrillo wrote: I'd like to request the disownment of the package pam_ssh (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pam_ssh/) with the intention of taking over its maintainership.

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: ingen-svn and related packages

2014-03-01 Thread speps
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 02:12:10 +0100 prettyvanilla prettyvani...@posteo.at wrote: [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ingen-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/raul-svn/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ganv-svn/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lilv-svn/ Disowned. [5]

[aur-general] Disownment Request: pam_ssh

2014-02-28 Thread pancho horrillo
Hi! I'd like to request the disownment of the package pam_ssh (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pam_ssh/) with the intention of taking over its maintainership. Current maintainer did not respond to Flag-out-of-date, comment and email (quote below), more than two months ago. Thanks a bunch!

[aur-general] Disownment Request: ingen-svn and related packages

2014-02-26 Thread prettyvanilla
Hi, I tried reaching speps 2 weeks ago via email (quoted below), so I hope he either reads it here or someone can disown the following packages for me. Most of them are marked out-of-date for a while and haven't been updated to current standards (including lilv-svn, which I now realize is owned

[aur-general] Disownment request: porta

2013-10-10 Thread Robert Schwarz
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/porta/ The current package does not work and has not been updated for years. I tried to email the maintainer, but the address is no longer valid. I'd like to update it (see comment section.) Best -- Robert Schwarz signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: porta

2013-10-10 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Robert Schwarz m...@rschwarz.net wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/porta/ The current package does not work and has not been updated for years. I tried to email the maintainer, but the address is no longer valid. I'd like to update it (see comment

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request] haskell-hashable

2013-03-02 Thread Ike Devolder
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:57:31AM +0100, hau...@gmx.com wrote: haskell-hashable [1] hasn't been updated in over a year. I would like to take it over. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39917 ~ hauzer Since it is flagged out of date for more than 3 months, disowned. Pick up

[aur-general] [Disownment request] haskell-hashable

2013-02-28 Thread hauzer
haskell-hashable [1] hasn't been updated in over a year. I would like to take it over. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39917 ~ hauzer

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request] peervpn

2012-12-09 Thread Frederik Freso S. Olesen
Den 08-12-2012 16:31, Evangelos Foutras skrev: On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:16 PM, azrdev azr...@googlemail.com wrote: I'd like to take over peervpn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/peervpn/ Flagged out-of-date in June 2012, current maintainer didn't react to my mail from 2012-11-29. Done,

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request] peervpn

2012-12-09 Thread azrdev
2012/12/9 Frederik Freso S. Olesen archli...@freso.dk: Not attempting to second guess, but I thought you were supposed to wait 2 week Package was flagged out-of-date in June, I think that was the reason for the TU to act without waiting.

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request] peervpn

2012-12-09 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:02 PM, azrdev azr...@googlemail.com wrote: 2012/12/9 Frederik Freso S. Olesen archli...@freso.dk: Not attempting to second guess, but I thought you were supposed to wait 2 week Package was flagged out-of-date in June, I think that was the reason for the TU to act

[aur-general] [Disownment Request] peervpn

2012-12-08 Thread azrdev
I'd like to take over peervpn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/peervpn/ Flagged out-of-date in June 2012, current maintainer didn't react to my mail from 2012-11-29.

[aur-general] Disownment Request: repo-clean-xz

2012-11-30 Thread Ryan Roper
Package Name: repo-clean-xz[1] Reason: The package has been abandoned by the maintainer and I have received no response when contacting via email. I first emailed the maintainer July 25, 2012 requesting it be updated with a PKGBUILD and patch provided in the comments. I just sent another email

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: repo-clean-xz

2012-11-30 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Ryan Roper ryan.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Package Name: repo-clean-xz[1] Reason: The package has been abandoned by the maintainer and I have received no response when contacting via email. I first emailed the maintainer July 25, 2012 requesting it be updated with

[aur-general] Disownment Request: ajenti-gi

2012-10-02 Thread Yannik Stein
Could someone please disown the package ajenti-git? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41177 It has been flagged as out of date for 5 months now. I contacted the package maintainer 3 weeks ago, but haven't got any reply. Thanks, Yannik signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: ajenti-gi

2012-10-02 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Yannik Stein yannikst...@gmail.com wrote: Could someone please disown the package ajenti-git? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41177 It has been flagged as out of date for 5 months now. I contacted the package maintainer 3 weeks ago, but haven't got

[aur-general] Disownment request: xmlrpc-epi

2012-09-22 Thread Drake
Please disown package xmlrpc-epi. It has been flagged out of date since 19 April 2012 and the owner last updated it in 2009. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23789 Thanks, Drake

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: xmlrpc-epi

2012-09-22 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Drake lightdr...@gmail.com wrote: Please disown package xmlrpc-epi. It has been flagged out of date since 19 April 2012 and the owner last updated it in 2009. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23789 Done, thanks.

[aur-general] Disownment request for granola{,gui,connect}

2012-08-21 Thread Limao Luo
I am posting this as a request for disownment of granola [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36841 ], granola-gui [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36866 ], and granola-connect [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51670 ]. granola and granola-gui are currently out of

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request for granola{,gui,connect}

2012-08-21 Thread Limao Luo
On 08/21/2012 06:21 AM, Limao Luo wrote: I am posting this as a request for disownment of granola [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36841 ], granola-gui [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36866 ], and granola-connect [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51670 ].

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request

2012-02-26 Thread Xyne
rafael ff1 wrote: portaudio-svn [1] has some issues with 'makedepends' and 'options'. I already requested the maintainer to fix the PKGBUILD, which was last updated back in May/2008. As can be seen below, I can't contact him because his email's domain doesn't exist. Please disown this