Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request]

On Monday 19 May 2014 20:09:21 Berno Strik wrote: > Can someone please disown https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dcp387c > The maintainer agreed to disown, but I think he does not know his AUR > username and password. Find the email conversation here-after. Done, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алек

[aur-general] [Disownment Request]

Can someone please disown https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dcp387c The maintainer agreed to disown, but I think he does not know his AUR username and password. Find the email conversation here-after. From: Berno Strik (by way of Berno Strik ) To: tastal...@free.fr Subject: AUR package dcp387c

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request] rhash

On Sunday 18 May 2014 22:22:01 carstene1ns wrote: > Hello, please disown rhash[1] package, flagged 2014-02-22. I contacted > Maintainer Red54 on 2014-05-02 and received no reply. Thanks! Done. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 J

[aur-general] [Disownment Request] rhash

Hello, please disown rhash[1] package, flagged 2014-02-22. I contacted Maintainer Red54 on 2014-05-02 and received no reply. Thanks! best regards, carstene1ns [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rhash/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request for package "ejtagproxy-svn"

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Taylor Lookabaugh < jesus.christ.i.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > On May 17, 2014 6:29 PM, "David Manouchehri" wrote: > > > > Maxime, > > > > I sent him an email on May 3rd, so it's been two weeks. > > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ejtagproxy-svn > Just an FYI

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request for package "ejtagproxy-svn"

On May 17, 2014 6:29 PM, "David Manouchehri" wrote: > > Maxime, > > I sent him an email on May 3rd, so it's been two weeks. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ejtagproxy-svn Just an FYI, please do not start a new thread.

[aur-general] Disownment request for package "ejtagproxy-svn"

Maxime, I sent him an email on May 3rd, so it's been two weeks. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ejtagproxy-svn

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request for package "ejtagproxy-svn"

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 4:33 AM, David Manouchehri wrote: > I sent Paul (paulburton89) an updated PKGBUILD for ejtagproxy-svn with a > proper pkgver on May 3rd (at the moment it fails to build the newest > version without manual intervention). I haven't heard back from him or seen > the package u

[aur-general] Disownment request for package "ejtagproxy-svn"

I sent Paul (paulburton89) an updated PKGBUILD for ejtagproxy-svn with a proper pkgver on May 3rd (at the moment it fails to build the newest version without manual intervention). I haven't heard back from him or seen the package updated since, therefore I am requesting to adopt it myself. David M

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request]

On Wednesday 14 May 2014 23:07:01 Berno Strik wrote: > Please disown package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flamerobin-git so > that I can take over. > > The maintainer did not respond to any of the comments (first one on > 2014-04-21, second one on 2014-04-29) and to the mail I send to him.

[aur-general] [Disownment Request]

Please disown package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flamerobin-git so that I can take over. The maintainer did not respond to any of the comments (first one on 2014-04-21, second one on 2014-04-29) and to the mail I send to him. With Regards From: Berno Strik To: ilya.selumi...@gmail.com

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: tomb

On 2014-05-14 1:37 am, Doug Newgard wrote: Current guidelines require you to attempt to contact the maintainer directly and wait two weeks. Have you attempted to email him at all? I just sent it. I'll update here if two weeks passes without a response. -- Rich

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: tomb

On 2014-05-14 01:47, Rich wrote: Hi, I'm requesting that the package "tomb" [1] be disowned so that I can adopt it. The package has been flagged out of date since 2014-01-27. I posted an updated PKGBUILD in the package comments on 2014-02-26. The current (out-of-date) package does not even bu

[aur-general] Disownment request: tomb

Hi, I'm requesting that the package "tomb" [1] be disowned so that I can adopt it. The package has been flagged out of date since 2014-01-27. I posted an updated PKGBUILD in the package comments on 2014-02-26. The current (out-of-date) package does not even build since the source URL returns

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Berno Strik wrote: > > Can you please merge, > > [1] and [2] into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl5250dn > [3] and [4] into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-490cw > [5] and [6] into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-495cw >

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

On 05/12/2014 11:15 PM, Berno Strik wrote: On 05/12/2014 11:02 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Berno Strik wrote: By joining I mean that I combine the cupswrapper and lpr packages into one new package. You can see examples of that if you look at the brother-packag

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

On 05/12/2014 11:02 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Berno Strik wrote: By joining I mean that I combine the cupswrapper and lpr packages into one new package. You can see examples of that if you look at the brother-packages owned by "libernux" Can you upload the ne

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Berno Strik wrote: > > By joining I mean that I combine the cupswrapper and lpr packages into one > new package. > You can see examples of that if you look at the brother-packages owned by > "libernux" Can you upload the new packages? I will happily merge these o

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

Berno is doing a great job be refactoring all these old Brother packages. @Berno, Will you try to take over these dcp* packages and reupload them with proper? Some of them are already orphan, e.g. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dcp110c/ -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasH

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

On 05/12/2014 10:29 PM, Xyne wrote: On 2014-05-12 22:13 +0200 Berno Strik wrote: On 29 of April I've contacted the maintainers of some brother-packages. They did not respond. (emails enclosed at the bottom). Can you please disown the following packages: [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

On 2014-05-12 22:13 +0200 Berno Strik wrote: >On 29 of April I've contacted the maintainers of some brother-packages. >They did not respond. (emails enclosed at the bottom). > >Can you please disown the following packages: > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl5250dn-cupswrapper >[2]

[aur-general] [Disownment request]

On 29 of April I've contacted the maintainers of some brother-packages. They did not respond. (emails enclosed at the bottom). Can you please disown the following packages: [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl5250dn-cupswrapper [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl5250dn

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: gtk2-aqd and gtk3-aqd

On Friday 09 May 2014 20:17:05 Giuseppe Borzi wrote: > I would like to request disownment of the packages "gtk2-aqd" [1] and > "gtk3-aqd" [2] > with intetion of taking over maintenance along with the already orphaned > "xfce4-macmenu-plugin" [3]. > > Current maintainer did not respond to flagging

[aur-general] Disownment request: gtk2-aqd and gtk3-aqd

Hello, I would like to request disownment of the packages "gtk2-aqd" [1] and "gtk3-aqd" [2] with intetion of taking over maintenance along with the already orphaned "xfce4-macmenu-plugin" [3]. Current maintainer did not respond to flagging the package out of date since 2013-07-04 for gtk2-aqd and

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: eclipse-aptana

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Miodrag Tokić wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to request disownment of the package "eclipse-aptana" [1] with > intetion of taking over maintenance. > > Current maintainer did not respond to flagging the package out of date > since 2013-07-22 and is not reachable by

[aur-general] Disownment request: eclipse-aptana

Hi, I would like to request disownment of the package "eclipse-aptana" [1] with intetion of taking over maintenance. Current maintainer did not respond to flagging the package out of date since 2013-07-22 and is not reachable by email (Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender). I belive you can al

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request] brother-mfc-295cn

On Friday, April 04, 2014 23:59:17 Berno Strik wrote: > Please disown [1] so that I can take over. > > I've contacted the maintainer but he did not respond. > (See bottom of this mail). > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-295cn Disowned, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.

[aur-general] [Disownment Request] brother-mfc-295cn

Please disown [1] so that I can take over. I've contacted the maintainer but he did not respond. (See bottom of this mail). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-295cn From: Berno Strik To: aarc...@marketext.com Subject: AUR package brother-mfc-295cn Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 19:54:3

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: kdeplasma-applets-redshift

On 31/03/14 03:11 PM, thecatt...@gmx.com wrote: > Hi, any news about this? Still no response from the actual maintainer. > Regards. Disowned, thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: kdeplasma-applets-redshift

Hi, any news about this? Still no response from the actual maintainer. Regards.

[aur-general] Disownment Request: kdeplasma-applets-redshift

Hi, the package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeplasma-applets-redshift/ is outdated since more than a month. Send an email over a week ago with no response to the following addresses: a...@wall-dev.org 4k1r4.ru...@gmail.com Could you disown the package? As soon as it is available, I adopt

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request] brother-mfc-230c

On Saturday, March 15, 2014 18:59:33 Berno Strik wrote: > Please disown [1] so that I can take over. > > I've contacted the maintainer but he did not respond. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-230c/ Disowned, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a

[aur-general] [Disownment Request] brother-mfc-230c

Please disown [1] so that I can take over. I've contacted the maintainer but he did not respond. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-230c/

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: ingen-svn and related packages

On 03/02/2014 06:04 AM, speps wrote: >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ingen-svn/ >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/raul-svn/ >> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ganv-svn/ >> [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lilv-svn/ > Disowned. Thanks, updated! >> [5] https://aur.arc

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: ingen-svn and related packages

On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 02:12:10 +0100 prettyvanilla wrote: > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ingen-svn/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/raul-svn/ > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ganv-svn/ > [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lilv-svn/ Disowned. > [5] https://aur.archlin

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: pam_ssh

On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 01:51:47PM +0400, Evgeniy Alekseev wrote: > On Saturday 01 March 2014 08:51:45 pancho horrillo wrote: > > I'd like to request the disownment of the package pam_ssh > > > > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pam_ssh/) > > > > with the intention of taking over its maintaine

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: pam_ssh

On Saturday 01 March 2014 08:51:45 pancho horrillo wrote: > I'd like to request the disownment of the package pam_ssh > > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pam_ssh/) > > with the intention of taking over its maintainership. > > Current maintainer did not respond to Flag-out-of-date, comment an

[aur-general] Disownment Request: pam_ssh

Hi! I'd like to request the disownment of the package pam_ssh (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pam_ssh/) with the intention of taking over its maintainership. Current maintainer did not respond to Flag-out-of-date, comment and email (quote below), more than two months ago. Thanks a bunch!

[aur-general] Disownment Request: ingen-svn and related packages

Hi, I tried reaching speps 2 weeks ago via email (quoted below), so I hope he either reads it here or someone can disown the following packages for me. Most of them are marked out-of-date for a while and haven't been updated to current standards (including lilv-svn, which I now realize is owned by

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: porta

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Robert Schwarz wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/porta/ > > The current package does not work and has not been updated for years. > I tried to email the maintainer, but the address is no longer valid. > > I'd like to update it (see comment section.) > >

[aur-general] Disownment request: porta

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/porta/ The current package does not work and has not been updated for years. I tried to email the maintainer, but the address is no longer valid. I'd like to update it (see comment section.) Best -- Robert Schwarz signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digit

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request] haskell-hashable

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:57:31AM +0100, hau...@gmx.com wrote: > haskell-hashable [1] hasn't been updated in over a year. I would like to take > it over. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39917 > > ~ hauzer Since it is flagged out of date for more than 3 months, disowned. Pick

[aur-general] [Disownment request] haskell-hashable

haskell-hashable [1] hasn't been updated in over a year. I would like to take it over. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39917 ~ hauzer

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request] peervpn

On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:02 PM, azrdev wrote: > 2012/12/9 Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen : >> Not attempting to second guess, but I thought you were supposed to wait 2 >> week > Package was flagged out-of-date in June, I think that was the reason > for the TU to act without waiting. This is correct.

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request] peervpn

2012/12/9 Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen : > Not attempting to second guess, but I thought you were supposed to wait 2 > week Package was flagged out-of-date in June, I think that was the reason for the TU to act without waiting.

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request] peervpn

Den 08-12-2012 16:31, Evangelos Foutras skrev: On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:16 PM, azrdev wrote: I'd like to take over peervpn Flagged out-of-date in June 2012, current maintainer didn't react to my mail from 2012-11-29. Done, thanks. Not attempting

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment Request] peervpn

On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:16 PM, azrdev wrote: > I'd like to take over peervpn > Flagged out-of-date in June 2012, current maintainer didn't react to > my mail from 2012-11-29. Done, thanks.

[aur-general] [Disownment Request] peervpn

I'd like to take over peervpn Flagged out-of-date in June 2012, current maintainer didn't react to my mail from 2012-11-29.

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: repo-clean-xz

On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Ryan Roper wrote: > Package Name: repo-clean-xz[1] > > Reason: The package has been abandoned by the maintainer and I have > received no response when contacting via email. I first emailed the > maintainer July 25, 2012 requesting it be updated with a PKGBUILD > and

[aur-general] Disownment Request: repo-clean-xz

Package Name: repo-clean-xz[1] Reason: The package has been abandoned by the maintainer and I have received no response when contacting via email. I first emailed the maintainer July 25, 2012 requesting it be updated with a PKGBUILD and patch provided in the comments. I just sent another email req

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: ajenti-gi

On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Yannik Stein wrote: > Could someone please disown the package ajenti-git? > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41177 > It has been flagged as out of date for 5 months now. I contacted the > package maintainer 3 weeks ago, but haven't got any reply. Done, an

[aur-general] Disownment Request: ajenti-gi

Could someone please disown the package ajenti-git? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41177 It has been flagged as out of date for 5 months now. I contacted the package maintainer 3 weeks ago, but haven't got any reply. Thanks, Yannik signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: xmlrpc-epi

On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Drake wrote: > Please disown package xmlrpc-epi. It has been flagged out of date since 19 > April 2012 and the owner last updated it in 2009. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23789 Done, thanks.

[aur-general] Disownment request: xmlrpc-epi

Please disown package xmlrpc-epi. It has been flagged out of date since 19 April 2012 and the owner last updated it in 2009. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23789 Thanks, Drake

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request for granola{,gui,connect}

On 08/21/2012 06:21 AM, Limao Luo wrote: I am posting this as a request for disownment of granola [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36841 ], granola-gui [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36866 ], and granola-connect [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51670 ]. grano

[aur-general] Disownment request for granola{,gui,connect}

I am posting this as a request for disownment of granola [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36841 ], granola-gui [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36866 ], and granola-connect [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51670 ]. granola and granola-gui are currently out of da

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request

On 2012-02-27 03:51 + (09:1) Xyne wrote: > rafael ff1 wrote: > > > portaudio-svn [1] has some issues with 'makedepends' and 'options'. I > > already requested the maintainer to fix the PKGBUILD, which was last > > updated back in May/2008. As can be seen below, I can't contact him > > because

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request

rafael ff1 wrote: > portaudio-svn [1] has some issues with 'makedepends' and 'options'. I > already requested the maintainer to fix the PKGBUILD, which was last > updated back in May/2008. As can be seen below, I can't contact him > because his email's domain doesn't exist. > > Please disown this

[aur-general] Disownment request

portaudio-svn [1] has some issues with 'makedepends' and 'options'. I already requested the maintainer to fix the PKGBUILD, which was last updated back in May/2008. As can be seen below, I can't contact him because his email's domain doesn't exist. Please disown this package so I can adopt and fix