Re: [aur-general] [RFC v2] Draft of the AUR 4.0.0 migration notification

2015-05-31 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, 31 May 2015 at 20:55:17, Duru Can Celasun wrote: [...] Not a major concern, but will it be possible to merge comments / votes / flags from the old AUR instance? What do you mean by merge comments? Current package comments and votes can be retained, i.e. merged into the new database

Re: [aur-general] [RFC v2] Draft of the AUR 4.0.0 migration notification

2015-05-31 Thread Duru Can Celasun
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Lukas Fleischer lfleisc...@archlinux.org wrote: On Sun, 31 May 2015 at 20:55:17, Duru Can Celasun wrote: [...] Not a major concern, but will it be possible to merge comments / votes / flags from the old AUR instance? What do you mean by merge comments?

Re: [aur-general] [RFC v2] Draft of the AUR 4.0.0 migration notification

2015-05-31 Thread Duru Can Celasun
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Lukas Fleischer lfleisc...@archlinux.org wrote: The original thread is too cluttered already so I decided to submit the second version in a separate thread. The only real change is that we decided to not make aur.archlinux.org a read-only archive such that

[aur-general] [RFC v2] Draft of the AUR 4.0.0 migration notification

2015-05-31 Thread Lukas Fleischer
The original thread is too cluttered already so I decided to submit the second version in a separate thread. The only real change is that we decided to not make aur.archlinux.org a read-only archive such that users still get updates during the transition period (if AUR package maintainers decide