On Wednesday 10 November 2010 12:43:28 Heiko Baums wrote: > You should really think about that. There are many of the most > important, oldest and best known packages in this list like dia, ding, > xboard, eboard, epdfview, slmodem etc. > > In other words, your list is likely the half of the distro. > > If you would put all of them to AUR then you could give up Arch Linux, > because then it has almost no advantage over Gentoo, that is, then will > Arch Linux become a second Gentoo, because the users will have to > compile a lot of (most of the) important packages manually. > > And the reason why I switched from Gentoo to Arch Linux about 3 or 4 > years ago after using Gentoo for about 6 years was that I was sick of > compiling everything and that Arch Linux was a binary distribution. > > So if you would really do this clean up and move all these packages to > AUR then I could and most likely would switch back to Gentoo. > > So really, please, reconsider your idea of doing this massive and > pointless cleanup. If you read with attention my mail, you read:
"If some DEV wants to keep a package simply cross it out (adoption is not required, but it would be nice) or reply to this mail." This means that if _any_ DEV consider a package important and he thinks that should be kept in [extra], he only have to cross it out. Also, if you look at that wiki page, ours TUs want to maintain more of them in [community]. So there is no reasons to say that we will became a second Gentoo. Cheers -- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
