Re: [aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

2014-02-06 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:21 PM, wrote: > Actually, I do have another concern. The package mcabber-libotr4[1] is > now superfluous. Under nixtrian, the mcabber-hg package did not enable > libotr4 even though upstream has it in the code. My update to the > PKGBUILD now adds libotr4 support by defau

Re: [aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

2014-02-05 Thread tuftedocelot
Actually, I do have another concern. The package mcabber-libotr4[1] is now superfluous. Under nixtrian, the mcabber-hg package did not enable libotr4 even though upstream has it in the code. My update to the PKGBUILD now adds libotr4 support by default (this follows the lead from mcabber in communi

[aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

2014-02-05 Thread tuftedocelot
Thanks for orphaning all of the packages. I'll go through them and figure out which ones are stale and can be deleted and which ones can be kept. I'll submit changes necessary in a single request rather than spamming the list with removal requests. Lucas

Re: [aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

2014-02-05 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Nowaker wrote: > I've disowned mcabber-hg and all ood modules (they were all flagged more >> than a year ago). Adopt away! >> > > Maxime, I think you should disown all non-ood mcabber-* too. See the "Last > Updated" for a few. Should anyone mark a package out of da

Re: [aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

2014-02-05 Thread Nowaker
I've disowned mcabber-hg and all ood modules (they were all flagged more than a year ago). Adopt away! Maxime, I think you should disown all non-ood mcabber-* too. See the "Last Updated" for a few. Should anyone mark a package out of date, it gets removed at 23:00. https://aur.archlinux.org/

Re: [aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

2014-02-05 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Nowaker wrote: > One interesting thing to note is that the last updated date will change on >> a regular basis (usually around 23:00), but the PKGBUILD itself is >> unchanged. >> > > Sounds like anti-mark-out-of-date bot. Nice one. > > There are several mcabber-mod

Re: [aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

2014-02-05 Thread Nowaker
One interesting thing to note is that the last updated date will change on a regular basis (usually around 23:00), but the PKGBUILD itself is unchanged. Sounds like anti-mark-out-of-date bot. Nice one. There are several mcabber-module-* packages that are out of date, a TU should consider diso

[aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

2014-02-05 Thread tuftedocelot
To whom it may concern, I am requesting disownment of the mcabber-hg[1] AUR package so I may claim maintainership. I contacted the current maintainer two weeks ago[2] about merging in my PKGBUILD to improve functionality, but also to bring it up to the current PKGBUILD standards. I have not rec