On 13/04/11 13:40, Jan Steffens wrote:
> Disowned.
Thanks Jan :)
pgpb4g81HWQlB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:04 PM, notizblock wrote:
> Hi TUs,
> please orphan python-bitstring
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36002)
>
> The package is out of date and currently broken. Last updated: Thu, 30
> Sep 2010 14:41:44 +.
> The maintainer did not respond to my e-mail sinc
On 13/04/11 13:25, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> Would be grateful if that was updated =). The offlineimap developments
> currently in git are really interesting.
Indeed - I joined their mailing list about a month ago and I'm quite impressed
with the amount of activity in the project and the communication w
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Mark Foxwell
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please can you orphan offlineimap-git:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24202
>
> I suggested changes to the PKGBUILD (see comments) and contacted the
> maintainer directly by email but no reply in two weeks.
>
> Thanks,
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mark Foxwell
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please can you orphan offlineimap-git:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24202
>
> I suggested changes to the PKGBUILD (see comments) and contacted the
> maintainer directly by email but no reply in two weeks.
>
> Thanks,
Hi,
Please can you orphan offlineimap-git:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24202
I suggested changes to the PKGBUILD (see comments) and contacted the maintainer
directly by email but no reply in two weeks.
Thanks,
Mark (fastfret79)
pgpmO7W0T8ohc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi TUs,
please orphan python-bitstring
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36002)
The package is out of date and currently broken. Last updated: Thu, 30
Sep 2010 14:41:44 +.
The maintainer did not respond to my e-mail since 3 days. I want to
provide python 2 and 3 package for bitstring.
I sent an email to the maintainer of gmabooster in AUR (doesn't build
properly), but he's not responded in 4 days. He seems to be inactive
sitewide. I have a fix and some improvements ready to be committed. Could a
TU please orphan gmabooster and I'll take it up?
Thanks,
- Chris
N30N wrote:
> I emailed the maintainer some time ago with an updated PKGBUILD and have
> see reply/activity. So I'm requesting the step towards orphaning the
> package be started.
>
> Thanks,
> Aldrik (aka N30N).
Hi,
The package was updated Jan 16 and it is not currently flagged as
out-of-date,
I emailed the maintainer some time ago with an updated PKGBUILD and have
see reply/activity. So I'm requesting the step towards orphaning the
package be started.
Thanks,
Aldrik (aka N30N).
On 22 February 2011 20:17, Andreas Baumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I repeat my request for orphaning the two packages:
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41637
>
> and
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41639
>
> Sent email to the maintainer, no reaction.
>
> Greetings
>
> Andreas
>
Hi,
I repeat my request for orphaning the two packages:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41637
and
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41639
Sent email to the maintainer, no reaction.
Greetings
Andreas
--
Andreas Baumann
Trottenstrasse 20
CH-8037 Zuerich
Telefon: +41(0)76/373
On 02/05/2011 11:49 PM, György Balló wrote:
Please orphan gnome-paint package [1], because it's outdated for a
while, and my e-mail to the maintainer was rejected (the address is
not exists).
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32487
--
City-busz
done
--
Ionuț
Please orphan gnome-paint package [1], because it's outdated for a
while, and my e-mail to the maintainer was rejected (the address is
not exists).
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32487
--
City-busz
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:32 PM, biginoz wrote:
> Could you orphan the yacy package ?
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8337
> It's not updated, for two month ago.
Done, thanks.
Could you orphan the yacy package ?
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8337
It's not updated, for two month ago.
Thank.
Biginoz
ke, 2011-02-02 kello 10:09 -0700, Thomas S Hatch kirjoitti:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Andreas Baumann wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 10:01:07AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Andreas Baumann
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Andreas Baumann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 10:01:07AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Andreas Baumann
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > Now being a proud owner of a Logitech 600 I would like to try the
> > > 'congruit
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 10:01:07AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Andreas Baumann wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Now being a proud owner of a Logitech 600 I would like to try the
> > 'congruity' and 'python-libconcord' packages. They seem not to
> > be updated to 'py
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Andreas Baumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Now being a proud owner of a Logitech 600 I would like to try the
> 'congruity' and 'python-libconcord' packages. They seem not to
> be updated to 'python2'. I would like to adapt them..
>
>
> Greetings
>
> Andreas
>
Please send
Hi,
Now being a proud owner of a Logitech 600 I would like to try the
'congruity' and 'python-libconcord' packages. They seem not to
be updated to 'python2'. I would like to adapt them..
Greetings
Andreas
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On 30/01/11 19:48, masutu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > can you please orphan the package cdu (
> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34752). As you can see
> (forwarded
> > message), the current maintainer does no longer want to maintain
On 30/01/11 19:48, masutu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can you please orphan the package cdu (
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34752). As you can see (forwarded
> message), the current maintainer does no longer want to maintain this
> packages, I'd like to adopt it.
Done.
Hi,
can you please orphan the package cdu (
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34752). As you can see (forwarded
message), the current maintainer does no longer want to maintain this
packages, I'd like to adopt it.
masutu
-- Forwarded message --
From: Igor Hlina
Date: Sun
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 11:42 +0100, György Balló wrote:
> Please orphan the following packages, because they are
> outdated/broken, and the maintainers not responded to my mail for a
> week:
> * dates
> * postr
> * tasque
> * gwibber-bzr
>
> --
> City-busz
done, good luck maintaining the packages
Please orphan the following packages, because they are
outdated/broken, and the maintainers not responded to my mail for a
week:
* dates
* postr
* tasque
* gwibber-bzr
--
City-busz
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:20:18 +0100
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 04:59:06PM +0100, speps wrote:
> > I have also sent him an e-mail without responses
>
> You added an AUR comment just two days ago. How long did you wait for a
> response to your mail? Two days are definitely too
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 04:59:06PM +0100, speps wrote:
> I have also sent him an e-mail without responses
You added an AUR comment just two days ago. How long did you wait for a
response to your mail? Two days are definitely too short and if the
maintainer turned mail notifications off, he might h
Hi,
can you please orphan libircclient?
==> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14047
The package is not outdated, but it does not build and install
any shared lib, also it installs headers into a no proper path
according to
==> http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/amd64/libircclient-dev/filel
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:54 AM, speps wrote:
> Hi, can you please orphan libxml?
> ==> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15850
Done. :)
Hi, can you please orphan libxml?
==> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15850
The maintainer seems to be inactive since May 2009
The are 3 comments suggesting the x86_64 addition,
the last one on August 2010.
Also, i need it to work for my libglade-old.
Thanks
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Ethan Schoonover
wrote:
> I'd like to request that offlineimap-git be orphaned.
Done.
I'd like to request that offlineimap-git be orphaned.
- Current PKGBUILD points to old repository
- I've tried to contact the current maintainer via
email (listed address is a dead .edu account) and
via twitter with no luck. Last attempt was over
two weeks ago.
- I have already posted a prel
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 1:57 PM, kevku wrote:
> Requesting orphan on opensc http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10154
> no reply from maintainer in a week.
>
Done. --Kaiting.
--
Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
Requesting orphan on opensc http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10154
no reply from maintainer in a week.
On 12/30/10 at 12:14am, Marcin Karpezo wrote:
> On 29.12.2010 12:00, Marcin Karpezo wrote:
> > On 29.12.2010 11:56, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:40:29AM +0100, Marcin Karpezo wrote:
> >>> 0verkill package in AUR
> >>> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12753) need
On 29.12.2010 12:00, Marcin Karpezo wrote:
On 29.12.2010 11:56, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:40:29AM +0100, Marcin Karpezo wrote:
0verkill package in AUR
(http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12753) needs to be fixed
due to lack of x86_64 support, but it seems that curr
On 29.12.2010 11:56, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:40:29AM +0100, Marcin Karpezo wrote:
0verkill package in AUR
(http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12753) needs to be fixed
due to lack of x86_64 support, but it seems that current maintainer
isn't interested in it (last
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:40:29AM +0100, Marcin Karpezo wrote:
> 0verkill package in AUR
> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12753) needs to be fixed
> due to lack of x86_64 support, but it seems that current maintainer
> isn't interested in it (last update: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 11:54:05
> +00
Hi!
0verkill package in AUR (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12753)
needs to be fixed due to lack of x86_64 support, but it seems that
current maintainer isn't interested in it (last update: Sun, 30 Nov 2008
11:54:05 +).
Can I pick it up?
--
Regards,
Marcin Karpezo
Editor in chi
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
>> gpick (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24975)
>
> Its maintainer updated another package, wdiff [1], two days ago. I'm
> Cc'ing him here and if nothing happens in a week, I'll orphan it.
>
>> muttng (http://aur.archlinux.org/pa
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 01:27:43AM +0100, speps wrote:
> Hi, i've sent an e-mail to osc (farid) on 10/12/05 (two weeks ago)
> and i've got no response (also on identi.ca), maybe he's too busy.
>
> Please orphan:
> vmpk ==> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20321
> supercollider ==
Hi, i've sent an e-mail to osc (farid) on 10/12/05 (two weeks ago)
and i've got no response (also on identi.ca), maybe he's too busy.
Please orphan:
vmpk ==> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20321
supercollider ==> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14863
minicomputer ==>
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Bartek Piotrowski
wrote:
> Following packages have been out-of-date for a some time now. Maintainers
> hasn't replied comments and emails in more than week.
>
> flush (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25114)
> bleachbit (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.p
Following packages have been out-of-date for a some time now. Maintainers
hasn't replied comments and emails in more than week.
flush (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25114)
bleachbit (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22499)
gpick (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24975)
m
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 11:05 AM, jesse jaara wrote:
> Following packages have been out-of-date for a some time now
> suomi-malaga
> libvoikko
> enchant-voikko
> mozvoikko
> openoffice.org-voikko
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29725
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9525
> ht
Following packages have been out-of-date for a some time now
suomi-malaga
libvoikko
enchant-voikko
mozvoikko
openoffice.org-voikko
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29725
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9525
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30563
http://aur.archlinux.org/pa
>
> > > *digs out the top-poster beating-stick and eyes Kaiting menacingly*
> > >
> > *adding fuel to the fire*
> >
> > Hasn't he done that quite a few times before? =p
>
> He has. We even discussed it prior to his application.
>
> Ok, TUs, hold him down... it's time for some tough love. He has to
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Xyne wrote:
> > Kaiting Chen wrote:
> >
> >> Done. --Kaiting.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Gallant wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > Could pytyle2-hg be orphaned? It can be found here:
> >> >
> >> > http://aur.archlinu
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Xyne wrote:
> Kaiting Chen wrote:
>
>> Done. --Kaiting.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Gallant wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Could pytyle2-hg be orphaned? It can be found here:
>> >
>> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42541
>> >
>> > The
Kaiting Chen wrote:
> Done. --Kaiting.
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Gallant wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Could pytyle2-hg be orphaned? It can be found here:
> >
> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42541
> >
> > The current maintainer used a "10 Minute Mail" address, so he
Done. --Kaiting.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Gallant wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could pytyle2-hg be orphaned? It can be found here:
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42541
>
> The current maintainer used a "10 Minute Mail" address, so he cannot be
> reached. (I'm the developer of
Hello,
Could pytyle2-hg be orphaned? It can be found here:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42541
The current maintainer used a "10 Minute Mail" address, so he cannot be
reached. (I'm the developer of pytyle--I'll take over the package, as it is
currently broken.)
Thanks!
- Andrew
Excerpts from Ray Rashif's message of 2010-12-02 13:56:37 +0100:
> On 2 December 2010 20:48, Peter Lewis wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:07:59 Kaiting Chen wrote:
> >> As a general policy we wait a week before
> >> orphaning after you have contacted the maintainer expressing your desire
On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:56:37 Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 2 December 2010 20:48, Peter Lewis wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:07:59 Kaiting Chen wrote:
> >> As a general policy we wait a week before
> >> orphaning after you have contacted the maintainer expressing your desire
> >> to
On 2 December 2010 20:48, Peter Lewis wrote:
> On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:07:59 Kaiting Chen wrote:
>> As a general policy we wait a week before
>> orphaning after you have contacted the maintainer expressing your desire to
>> adopt to package.
>
> At least two weeks would be my minimum. It's
On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:07:59 Kaiting Chen wrote:
> As a general policy we wait a week before
> orphaning after you have contacted the maintainer expressing your desire to
> adopt to package.
At least two weeks would be my minimum. It's perfectly possible that someone
is just on holiday /
>
> fim - Highly customizable and scriptable framebuffer image viewer based
> on fbi. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15407
>
> It seems to be out-of-date since 2009 and the PKGBUILD is lacking to say
> the least. I can't promise to fix/maintain it, but the current
> maintainer doesn't se
fim - Highly customizable and scriptable framebuffer image viewer based
on fbi. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15407
It seems to be out-of-date since 2009 and the PKGBUILD is lacking to say
the least. I can't promise to fix/maintain it, but the current
maintainer doesn't seem to maintai
On 2 December 2010 09:50, jib wrote:
> Please orphan humanity-icons
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30460
>
> There is a bug in the PKGBUILD, and the maintainer hasn't replied
> comments and emails in more than two weeks.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
Orphaned
Please orphan humanity-icons
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30460
There is a bug in the PKGBUILD, and the maintainer hasn't replied
comments and emails in more than two weeks.
Thanks in advance.
On Saturday 27 November 2010 14:26:23 Xavier D. wrote:
> Please orphan gmpc-libnotify
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14266) as the maintainer
> doesn't respond and doesn't update its package (for a long time now).
> Thanks in advance.
Done.
Hello,
Please orphan gmpc-libnotify
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14266) as the maintainer
doesn't respond and doesn't update its package (for a long time now).
Thanks in advance.
BRs,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 05:22:07PM -0300, Frikilinux wrote:
> Could you orphan this package :
>
> regnum-online http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30621
Done. Merci :)
Hi,
Could you orphan this package :
regnum-online http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30621
The maintainer doesn't update, dont reply comments and i send an email
two week ago without reply.
Thanks.
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:23:20 +0100
jib wrote:
> Le 22/11/2010 09:18, Lukas Fleischer a écrit :
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 08:35:11AM +0100, jib wrote:
> >> Could you please orphan the following package:
> >>
> >> humanity-icons (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30460)
> >>
> >> The mainta
Le 22/11/2010 09:23, jib a écrit :
Le 22/11/2010 09:18, Lukas Fleischer a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 08:35:11AM +0100, jib wrote:
Could you please orphan the following package:
humanity-icons (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30460)
The maintainer doesn't correct a faulty PKGBUIL
Le 22/11/2010 09:18, Lukas Fleischer a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 08:35:11AM +0100, jib wrote:
Could you please orphan the following package:
humanity-icons (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30460)
The maintainer doesn't correct a faulty PKGBUILD; comments have been
posted, an ema
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 08:35:11AM +0100, jib wrote:
> Could you please orphan the following package:
>
> humanity-icons (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30460)
>
> The maintainer doesn't correct a faulty PKGBUILD; comments have been
> posted, an email has been sent without a reply.
> Th
Could you please orphan the following package:
humanity-icons (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30460)
The maintainer doesn't correct a faulty PKGBUILD; comments have been
posted, an email has been sent without a reply.
Thanks
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 02:07:58PM +0100, Clément Démoulins wrote:
> Could you orphan the packages :
> - python-yenc [http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7743]
> - tvnamer-git [http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36535]
>
> The maintainers doesn't update after the migration to python
Hi,
Could you orphan the packages :
- python-yenc [http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7743]
- tvnamer-git [http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36535]
The maintainers doesn't update after the migration to python 3. I post
comments and i send an email 1 week ago without reply.
Thanks
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 23:40 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 11/04/2010 11:31 PM, Aurelien DESBRIERES wrote:
> > done
> >
> > enjoy freedom!
> >
>
> since when you can orphan packages?
>
if some one works on it more than i am, why not?
--
Aurelien DESBRIERES
http://groups.fsf.org/wiki/User:Aurelie
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Xavier D. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you orphan the following package as the maintainer doesn't respond and
> doesn't upgrade a package that is outdated since a long time now :
> thunar-devel (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20771) ?
>
> BRs,
>
>
Done.
It's an other package that he orphans (that he was owning) ;)
My request was for an other package (the link is in the first mail).
On 11/04/2010 10:40 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 11/04/2010 11:31 PM, Aurelien DESBRIERES wrote:
done
enjoy freedom!
since when you can orphan packages?
On 11/04/2010 11:31 PM, Aurelien DESBRIERES wrote:
done
enjoy freedom!
since when you can orphan packages?
--
Ionuț
done
enjoy freedom!
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 22:28 +0100, Xavier D. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you orphan the following package as the maintainer doesn't respond
> and doesn't upgrade a package that is outdated since a long time now :
> thunar-devel (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20771) ?
Hi,
Could you orphan the following package as the maintainer doesn't respond
and doesn't upgrade a package that is outdated since a long time now :
thunar-devel (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20771) ?
BRs,
Hi Alexander,
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 09:58:38 Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> Could you orphan maniadrive
> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5344). It has not been updated
> since the 7th of Mars 2007 and the maintainer does not respond to emails.
> Thanks in advance.
This guy has a lo
Hi,
Could you orphan maniadrive (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5344).
It has not been updated since the 7th of Mars 2007 and the maintainer
does not respond to emails.
Thanks in advance.
- Alexander Rødseth
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Xavier D. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you orphan pjproject (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12848)
> as it's no more updated by the maintainer and he doesn't respond to emails.
> Thanks in advance.
>
> BRs
Done, thanks.
Hi,
Could you orphan pjproject
(http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12848) as it's no more updated
by the maintainer and he doesn't respond to emails.
Thanks in advance.
BRs
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 01:55:02PM +0200, SpepS wrote:
> After a week, still no risponse.
> Maybe it's time to orphan it.
I'll move portmidi to [community] today or tomorrow anyway, so there's
actually not much need to orphan it. Anyways, I quickly uploaded a fixed
source package heavily based on
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:12:52AM +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> On 19 October 2010 04:53, SpepS wrote:
> > Portmidi last update was on 3 September 2009
> >
> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23403
> >
> > The user (denis) owns 5/16 outdated packages
> > and the last change was on 14 M
On 19 October 2010 04:53, SpepS wrote:
> Portmidi last update was on 3 September 2009
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23403
>
> The user (denis) owns 5/16 outdated packages
> and the last change was on 14 May 2010.
>
> Btw, i have sent an e-mail today notifying about
> this to give hi
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Vitaliy Berdinskikh wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Please orphan pam_blue:
> * the package is outdated
> * owner haven't any update since 2007
>
> --
> Vitaliy Berdinskikh UR6LAD
> 73 & 72!
Done.
Hi!
Please orphan pam_blue:
* the package is outdated
* owner haven't any update since 2007
--
Vitaliy Berdinskikh UR6LAD
73 & 72!
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Renato Garcia wrote:
> Please orphan dos2unix[1]. It is outdated since before 21 Sep, on 21 Sep I
> have posted an updated PKGBUILD in AUR package page, and on 05 Oct I sent an
> email to gersonruotolo. He don't answered my email, nor updated the package.
>
> [1] h
Please orphan dos2unix[1]. It is outdated since before 21 Sep, on 21 Sep I
have posted an updated PKGBUILD in AUR package page, and on 05 Oct I sent an
email to gersonruotolo. He don't answered my email, nor updated the package.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36163
Portmidi last update was on 3 September 2009
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23403
The user (denis) owns 5/16 outdated packages
and the last change was on 14 May 2010.
Btw, i have sent an e-mail today notifying about
this to give him a chance to rescue his packages.
Also, there is a d
Am 16.10.2010 13:05, schrieb Mark Foxwell:
> Hi,
>
> Please can you orphan re-alpine:
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29123
>
> Package is out of date and I have emailed the maintainer with an updated
> PKGBUILD but not had any response for two weeks.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> M
Hi,
Please can you orphan re-alpine:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29123
Package is out of date and I have emailed the maintainer with an updated
PKGBUILD but not had any response for two weeks.
Thanks in advance,
Mark (fastfret79)
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:59 AM, wrote:
> Hi
>
> Please orphan start-stop-daemon (
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9808 ).
> Package has been out of date for a long time and it's been a week since I
> sent Vladimir an email with no response.
>
> Thanks.
Done. :)
Hi
Please orphan start-stop-daemon ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9808
).
Package has been out of date for a long time and it's been a week since I sent
Vladimir an email with no response.
Thanks.
2010/10/4 Lukáš Jirkovský :
> On 4 October 2010 11:21, DarkBaboon wrote:
>> Please orphan stjerm : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12324
>>
>> The PKGBUILD is outdated since more than a year (The PKGBUILD version is
>> 0.11 and the current 0.14), the project has been migrated from Gna to
On 4 October 2010 11:21, DarkBaboon wrote:
> Please orphan stjerm : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12324
>
> The PKGBUILD is outdated since more than a year (The PKGBUILD version is
> 0.11 and the current 0.14), the project has been migrated from Gna to
> GoogleCode and the initial contr
Please orphan stjerm : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12324
The PKGBUILD is outdated since more than a year (The PKGBUILD version is
0.11 and the current 0.14), the project has been migrated from Gna to
GoogleCode and the initial contributor seems to hasn't activity anymore
since April 2
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:27:24PM +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Henning Bekel wrote:
> > Please orphan ruby-taglib:
> >
> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12565
> >
> > The PKGBUILD is broken and the package needs a patch. The maintainer
> > does not
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Henning Bekel wrote:
> Please orphan ruby-taglib:
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12565
>
> The PKGBUILD is broken and the package needs a patch. The maintainer
> does not respond to comments or email. It's his only package, created
> in Aug 2007 and ne
Please orphan ruby-taglib:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12565
The PKGBUILD is broken and the package needs a patch. The maintainer
does not respond to comments or email. It's his only package, created
in Aug 2007 and never updated. The PKGBUILD misses dependencies, uses
the wrong lice
401 - 500 of 743 matches
Mail list logo
