Hi all,
I've written a Python 3 AUR module that some of you might find interesting or
useful: http://xyne.archlinux.ca/projects/python-aur/
Regards,
Xyne
2011/1/21 Xyne :
> I'm replying because this is tangential... why don't we specify "python3"
> instead of "python" as a dep to make packages future-proof? Even if Python 4
> doesn't come out for a decade or more, it just seems that it would be
> logically
> consistent.
Hi,
this idea came up last
Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> Hi AUR maintainers,
> I did a change in the pyqt package to add Python 3 support to it and to allow
> everyone to install both the Python2 and the Python3 version.
> Every package now need to depends on python2-qt (or python-qt if uses Python
> 3) instead of pyqt.
> The
Am 05.07.2010 16:33, schrieb Thomas Dziedzic:
> Hmm, the more I think about this, the more this solution sounds
> appealing, since it wouldn't require that much work.
> We could possibly move to python 3.x at a later time when one of the
> 2.7.x fixes comes out and when more packages have a chance
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here comes a rebuild so large that our TODO list had trouble handling it!
>> Hopefully all packages are now in the rebuild list At a total of 518
>> packages long,
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here comes a rebuild so large that our TODO list had trouble handling it!
> Hopefully all packages are now in the rebuild list At a total of 518
> packages long, it puts the combined libpng/libjpeg rebuild to shame.
>
> Python-
Hi all,
Here comes a rebuild so large that our TODO list had trouble handling
it! Hopefully all packages are now in the rebuild list At a total
of 518 packages long, it puts the combined libpng/libjpeg rebuild to shame.
Python-2.7 has been releases and will be the last 2.x official rele
