On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Xyne wrote:
>
> Ah, just saw the previous message...
>
> Ok, done too (I think).
>
>
you forgot to delete [9.1] and [10.1]:
[9.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22894
[10.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12090
Everything else is fine. Thank y
Joao Cordeiro wrote:
> Was I supposed to create a new mail instead of replying to the previous one?
>
> Anyway,
> powertop-svn [1], lgob-svn [2], gnuradio-svn [3] and pcmanfm-svn [4] all
> have been abandoned upstream and have git package.
>
>
> Thanks in advance
> Joao Cordeiro
>
> [1] http:/
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Joao Cordeiro wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Stefan Husmann > wrote:
>
>> Am 04.12.2010 16:40, schrieb Joao Cordeiro:
>>
>> Done, many thanks!
>>
>
> Some more:
>
> (... ... ...)
>
Was I supposed to create a new mail instead of replying to the prev
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Stefan Husmann
wrote:
> Am 04.12.2010 16:40, schrieb Joao Cordeiro:
>
> Done, many thanks!
>
Some more:
1) qutim-svn [1.1], qutim-plugin-kde-integration-svn [1.2],
qutim-plugin-icq-svn [1.3], qutim-plugin-jabber-svn [1.4],
qutim-plugin-mrim-svn [1.5] were replace
Am 04.12.2010 16:40, schrieb Joao Cordeiro:
> Some time ago I noticed that (obviously) there are several *-svn aur
> packages that no longer make sense because they were changed to git
> upstream. After a little thinking I came up with a list of all *-svn and
> *-cvs packages and made a script to c
Some time ago I noticed that (obviously) there are several *-svn aur
packages that no longer make sense because they were changed to git
upstream. After a little thinking I came up with a list of all *-svn and
*-cvs packages and made a script to check if said packages have a
corresponding -git pack
