On 12.08.15 at 23:54, Mark Laws wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In light of the mass deletion of many orphaned as well as
> not-really-orphaned packages, it would be nice if there were a way to
> get a log of AUR activity so that users other than just a package's
> maintainers can see that a package disappeared
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 at 04:20 Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:07:57 -0300
> Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
>
> > Em 12-08-2015 15:01, Doug Newgard escreveu:
> > > On the contrary, this is exactly the mechanism for that. You disown a
> package
> > > so that someone else can adopt it. Why
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:07:57 -0300
Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em 12-08-2015 15:01, Doug Newgard escreveu:
> > On the contrary, this is exactly the mechanism for that. You disown a
> > package
> > so that someone else can adopt it. Why else would you disown a package?
>
> Let me rephrase it. D
Em 12-08-2015 15:01, Doug Newgard escreveu:
> On the contrary, this is exactly the mechanism for that. You disown a package
> so that someone else can adopt it. Why else would you disown a package?
Let me rephrase it. Disowning a package isn't the mechanism for allowing
others to maintain a packag
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:54:56 -0300
Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> > We already have a mechanism for disowning a package and allowing
> > others to maintain it without deleting it. It's called orphaning.
> >
>
> This is not the mechanism for that, and it is the reason why the
> co-maintainer functi
Em 12-08-2015 14:42, Justin Dray escreveu:
>
> Perhaps seeing active comments or that the packages had to have been
> updated within month since everything was cleared for AUR4?
>
Comments aren't the best way. A package can work so well as to not have
any comments for a long time. Or is simple eno
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 03:36 Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Em 12-08-2015 14:21, Justin Dray escreveu:
> But by 'hidden' it also deletes all comments and votes, and stops
> people being able to search for the package, see that it isn't
> maintained and picking it up.
Well, the TU could have waited, I g
Em 12-08-2015 14:21, Justin Dray escreveu:
> But by 'hidden' it also deletes all comments and votes, and stops
> people being able to search for the package, see that it isn't
> maintained and picking it up.
Well, the TU could have waited, I give you that.
> Almost all of my packages have become
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:17:12 -0300
Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em 12-08-2015 14:10, Jens Adam escreveu:
> > That wasn't what happened. Read the thread(s) again - a single TU went
> > around and deleted a bunch of freshly orphaned packages, nothing to do
> > with the migration.
>
> I really don'
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 at 03:17 Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
> Em 12-08-2015 14:10, Jens Adam escreveu:
> > That wasn't what happened. Read the thread(s) again - a single TU went
> > around and deleted a bunch of freshly orphaned packages, nothing to do
> > with the migration.
>
> I really don't see t
Em 12-08-2015 14:10, Jens Adam escreveu:
> That wasn't what happened. Read the thread(s) again - a single TU went
> around and deleted a bunch of freshly orphaned packages, nothing to do
> with the migration.
I really don't see the issue here, even if is this that happened. They
were orphaned, wer
Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:54:31 -0300
Giancarlo Razzolini :
> I don't think that it was wrong to "hide" these when the subdomain
> migrated on Aug 8th.
That wasn't what happened. Read the thread(s) again - a single TU went
around and deleted a bunch of freshly orphaned packages, nothing to do
with the
Em 12-08-2015 12:42, Jens Adam escreveu:
> Our main issue here is about orphaned PKGBUILDs that got manually
> deleted after the transition was over.
But these were migrated to and then orphaned on the new AUR right? I
don't think that it was wrong to "hide" these when the subdomain
migrated on Au
Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:09:51 -0300
Giancarlo Razzolini :
> They were really orphaned. And it was warned that orphaned packages
> would be "deleted" on Aug 8th.
The announced (and executed) deletion was about stale AUR3 metadata
(migrated packages that weren't 'git push'ed) in the AUR4 database, no
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Git_repository ?
I was wondering if there was something like this. Thanks!
Cheers,
Mark Laws
--
|v\ /\ |\ |< |_ /\ \^| //
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
> For packages not migrated, I don't think there is a repo there.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Git_repository ?
Em 12-08-2015 11:54, Mark Laws escreveu:
> In light of the mass deletion of many orphaned as well as
> not-really-orphaned packages
They were really orphaned. And it was warned that orphaned packages
would be "deleted" on Aug 8th.
> , it would be nice if there were a way to
> get a log of AUR act
Hi,
In light of the mass deletion of many orphaned as well as
not-really-orphaned packages, it would be nice if there were a way to
get a log of AUR activity so that users other than just a package's
maintainers can see that a package disappeared at some given point.
It was also mentioned that de
18 matches
Mail list logo
