On 23/12/18 7:13 am, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
On 12/22/18 5:40 PM, hagar wrote:
On 23/12/18 2:40 am, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 04:41:28PM +0800, hagar
wrote:
Is there anything wrong with creating a pertner file to the packages
file
that has the
On 12/22/18 5:40 PM, hagar wrote:
> On 23/12/18 2:40 am, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 04:41:28PM +0800, hagar
>> wrote:
>>> Is there anything wrong with creating a pertner file to the packages
>>> file
>>> that has the pkgname, provides, description and git
On 23/12/18 2:40 am, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 04:41:28PM +0800, hagar wrote:
Is there anything wrong with creating a pertner file to the packages file
that has the pkgname, provides, description and git address in it.
Not sure what 'pertner' is supposed to
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 04:41:28PM +0800, hagar wrote:
> Is there anything wrong with creating a pertner file to the packages file
> that has the pkgname, provides, description and git address in it.
Not sure what 'pertner' is supposed to mean, but I'd say sure, we could
offer a database dump.
On 21/12/18 5:21 am, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:02:31PM +0200, Jerome Leclanche
wrote:
That should probably be fixed as well, but I agree with making the rate
limit window 1 hour, at most. A 24 hour API restriction on the AUR API is
really nasty imo.
So
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:02:31PM +0200, Jerome Leclanche
wrote:
> That should probably be fixed as well, but I agree with making the rate
> limit window 1 hour, at most. A 24 hour API restriction on the AUR API is
> really nasty imo.
So is running cower -u in conky every 5 seconds and not
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 9:45 PM Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On 12/21/18 at 03:40am, Macca wrote:
> >
> > On 21 Dec. 2018, 3:26 am, at 3:26 am, Drew DeVault via aur-general <
> aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> > >Following up from IRC. Hello!
> > >
> > >I run a public build service which has
On 12/21/18 at 03:40am, Macca wrote:
>
> On 21 Dec. 2018, 3:26 am, at 3:26 am, Drew DeVault via aur-general
> wrote:
> >Following up from IRC. Hello!
> >
> >I run a public build service which has Arch Linux support and uses yay
> >to install AUR packages when requested. I recently had some
I have personally run afoul of the rate limit.
I have gotten around it by downloading the package list file.
And then by using the got versions of the pkgbuilds.
Once you have the pkgbuild tree you only have to update it once and build m any
times.
You shouldn't have to download it.
Some of
Following up from IRC. Hello!
I run a public build service which has Arch Linux support and uses yay
to install AUR packages when requested. I recently had some users
running up against the AUR rate limit.
The current rate limit window (1 day) seems a bit strict. Would it be
possible to apply
10 matches
Mail list logo