Am 16.01.2014 23:24, schrieb oliver:
Hello,
I looked up some information...
Axiom has been forked in 2007 into
FriCAS and OpenAxiom.
yes
So, Axiom and OpenAxiom are the same.
no, that conclusion is false. Both projects exist and are more or less active.
They are even using different progr
> Is a comment to the maintainer and waiting for answer sufficient?
A comment may not be noticed by the maintainer, as the maintainer can
disable email notifications for their own packages. You should email the
maintainer if:
* You want to ensure that the maintainer knows about the incorrect packa
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:53:26PM +, Xyne wrote:
> On 2014-01-16 23:24 +0100
> oliver wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >I looked up some information...
> >
> >Axiom has been forked in 2007 into
> >FriCAS and OpenAxiom.
> >
> >So, Axiom and OpenAxiom are the same.
> >
> >Nevertheless there are two AUR
On 2014-01-16 23:24 +0100
oliver wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I looked up some information...
>
>Axiom has been forked in 2007 into
>FriCAS and OpenAxiom.
>
>So, Axiom and OpenAxiom are the same.
>
>Nevertheless there are two AUR-packages with OpenAxiom,
>and the mentioned licenses (in the package descriptio
Hello,
I looked up some information...
Axiom has been forked in 2007 into
FriCAS and OpenAxiom.
So, Axiom and OpenAxiom are the same.
Nevertheless there are two AUR-packages with OpenAxiom,
and the mentioned licenses (in the package description)
differ.
How will such a case be handled?
Ciao,
Hi,
I'm a bit confused about the Axiom-packages available on AUR:
There is
axiom-cas may2012-1
modified-BSD
pointing to http://www.axiom-developer.org/
( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/axiom-cas/ )
open-axiom 1.4.2-4
custom
pointing to http://www.open-axiom.org
( https://a
