‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, January 18, 2019 2:25 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general
wrote:
> Please never do this. It'll only lead to your package getting removed.
> AppImage is its own packaging format, repackaging it for the AUR when
> there are alternatives (there are) is
On 1/18/19 1:16 PM, Anton T Johansson wrote:
>
> I could do a PKGBUILD sourcing the AppImage if there's interest.
>
Please never do this. It'll only lead to your package getting removed.
AppImage is its own packaging format,
repackaging it for the AUR when there are alternatives (there are)
is
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, January 18, 2019 1:25 PM, Gonçalo Pereira
wrote:
>However there is a beta release for the 4.0 version so I think it should be
>cleaner to get that version from git (the specific commit) since that
>integrates with the system and doesn't install a
I see. I didn't see that.
However there is a beta release for the 4.0 version so I think it should be
cleaner to get that version from git (the specific commit) since that
integrates with the system and doesn't install a appimage introducing clutter.
But the decision is yours to take.
Regards,
On Friday, January 18, 2019 12:09 PM, Gonçalo Pereira
wrote:
>I've created the beta packages to match beta releases and not actually the git
>version so
>it would be a more or less stable but with new features not available in the
>release version.
Hi Gonçalo Pereira,
That is not accurate.
I've created the beta packages to match beta releases and not actually the git
version so it would be a more or less stable but with new features not
available in the release version.
Regards,
Gonçalo Pereira
> On 1/14/19 1:00 AM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote:
>
>
> Alright, time's up.
>
> I've gotten no objections in this thread and was met with a rather positive
> reaction on IRC,
> so I just went and orphaned the mentioned packages.
>
> Happy adopting, hopefully those packages find a new
On Mon, 2019-01-14 at 16:43 +0100, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote:
> On 1/14/19 1:00 AM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote:
> > I am going to orphan all 337 packages maintained by GPereira in a
> > couple of hours;
> > Those are going to inevitably rot during the rather long-term
> > account
On 1/14/19 1:00 AM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote:
> I am going to orphan all 337 packages maintained by GPereira in a couple of
> hours;
> Those are going to inevitably rot during the rather long-term account
> suspension anyways.
>
> The packages are:
>
> arcus-beta
> can-utils
>
I am going to orphan all 337 packages maintained by GPereira in a couple of
hours;
Those are going to inevitably rot during the rather long-term account
suspension anyways.
The packages are:
arcus-beta
can-utils
can-utils-git
cura-beta
curaengine-beta
esp-idf
fcl
gazebo
ideamaker
libdart
10 matches
Mail list logo
