I have successfully compiled/installed and run the chromium-continuous from
AUR repository on my pentium-m based laptop.
However, when doing a similar install on my desktop which has Athlon 2800+
CPU the build is fine, but I get an error on running it, the error is:
Code:
$ chromium-browser
[7215
> I have successfully compiled/installed and run [...]
you have packaged chromium but not compiled it as the PKGBUILD
downloaded an already compiled binary version of chrome.
you could try with a clean config dir. backup and remove
~/.config/chromium. and try again.
may be you're missing a depend
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 13:02 +0200, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
> > I have successfully compiled/installed and run [...]
> you have packaged chromium but not compiled it as the PKGBUILD
> downloaded an already compiled binary version of chrome.
>
> you could try with a clean config dir. backup and remo
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 13:02 +0200, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
>> > I have successfully compiled/installed and run [...]
>> you have packaged chromium but not compiled it as the PKGBUILD
>> downloaded an already compiled binary version of chrome.
>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Xavier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 13:02 +0200, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
> >> > I have successfully compiled/installed and run [...]
> >> you have packaged chromium but not compiled it as the PKGBUILD
> >
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Xavier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 13:02 +0200, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
> >> > I have successfully compiled/installed and run [...]
> >> you have packaged chromium but not compiled it as the PKGBUILD
> >
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Bernard Mentink wrote:
>
>
> Small point, can you specify the steps on how to edit the code and re-build
> the package? I take it that there is another way to download/edit/build
> rather than
> the automated "makepkg"
>
The problem is not makepkg itself, it's the
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Xavier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Bernard Mentink
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Small point, can you specify the steps on how to edit the code and
> re-build
> > the package? I take it that there is another way to download/edit/build
> > rather than
> > the
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Bernard Mentink wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Xavier wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Bernard Mentink
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Small point, can you specify the steps on how to edit the code and
>> re-build
>> > the package? I take it that th
2009/8/26 Xavier :
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Bernard Mentink wrote:
>>
>>
>> Small point, can you specify the steps on how to edit the code and re-build
>> the package? I take it that there is another way to download/edit/build
>> rather than
>> the automated "makepkg"
>>
>
> The problem i
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Xavier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Bernard Mentink
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Xavier wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Bernard Mentink
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Small point, can you specify the steps on how t
2009/8/26 Bernard Mentink
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Xavier wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Bernard Mentink
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Xavier wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Bernard Mentink
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
>
> I have libjpeg installed just fine in pacman. It seems that chromium
> can not find the lib, maybe it is looking in a different place?
>
> Cheers,
> Bernie
Hi
If your system is up to date, the libjpeg that pacman installs is the
libjpeg.7-1, you can obtain libjpeg.so.62 by installing libjp
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:10 PM, pascal wrote:
>
>>
>> I have libjpeg installed just fine in pacman. It seems that chromium
>> can not find the lib, maybe it is looking in a different place?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bernie
>
> Hi
>
> If your system is up to date, the libjpeg that pacman installs is the
> l
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Xavier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:10 PM, pascal wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I have libjpeg installed just fine in pacman. It seems that chromium
> >> can not find the lib, maybe it is looking in a different place?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Bernie
> >
> > Hi
> >
> >
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Xavier wrote:
> Anyone have a link to where I can get this lib from so that the latest
> Chromium will run.
> Thanks,
> Bernie
> PS: Why doesn't chrome us the version 7 of libjpeg anyway ...
>
http://arm.kh.nu/extra::2009-5-5/os/i686/libjpeg-6b-6-i686.pkg.tar.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Anton Shestakov wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Xavier wrote:
> > Anyone have a link to where I can get this lib from so that the latest
> > Chromium will run.
> > Thanks,
> > Bernie
> > PS: Why doesn't chrome us the version 7 of libjpeg anyway ...
>
>
> Hi, I tried getting libjpeg6 from AUR, but the website referenced in
> the package is also dead.
>
> The site is: ftp://ftp.uu.net/graphics/jpeg/jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz
>
> There doesn't seem to be anything on that site and it is veery
> slow.
Just for info, I have no problem getting it wi
18 matches
Mail list logo
