On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 17:14, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
> 2) It appears that the copyright owner is Adapco, not siemens. IIUC
>Siemens bought Adapco on 2016. Did you guys forget to update
>the copyright notice or is this an old tarball that
On 06/25/19 at 07:41pm, Adam Maram via aur-general wrote:
> not smart guy hehe
Please refrain from insulting and treat each other nicely. Also see the CoC [1]
> freely available file from government website and he has issues
Links to obtain illegal copies of software can also be deemed to be
ill
not smart guy hehe
freely available file from government website and he has issues
do you have problem with Google too? they distribute this code by their
search results if you could find it using their searcher
wt., 25.06.2019, 19:38 użytkownik Jerome Leclanche
napisał:
> It sounds like we'l
It sounds like we'll likely delete the package on the aur regardless,
seeing as it's unofficial, mostly unknown and unused. But your real problem
does seem to be with the gov website in question.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019, 19:21 Jones, Philip via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Thank
On 6/25/19 1:20 PM, Jones, Philip via aur-general wrote:
> 3) I am in contact with the US .gov site to get them to take down the
> original tarball which is obviously the definitive action but that
> will then leave you with a dangling link. If it is as popular as
> indicate that may not be an issu
On 6/25/19 12:09 PM, Daniel Berjón Díez via aur-general wrote:
> Hi Santiago, all,
>
> I'm very new to Arch and I don't know if the package I'm going to put
> forward as an example violates itself any AUR rule, but for instance
> 'ufsd-pro-dkms' [1] depends on a file that is not freely distributab
Thank you all for your replies. A quick summary form my viewpoint:
1) Yes, the copyright is CD-adapco and they are old files from many years ago
and we were since acquired by Siemens and they acquired the copyright.
2) The tarball is a mix of our copyright code and GPL open source (ADF which
was
On 6/25/19 10:53 AM, Jones, Philip via aur-general wrote:
> Jerome
>
> I appreciate that the package
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libccmio/) is not hosted on the
> site but if you Google " libccmio-2.6.1.tar.gz" it is the top hit.
This sounds like an SEO problem, have you tried contactin
FWIW
Votes: 0
Popularity: 0.00
First Submitted: 2017-07-10 02:05
Last Updated:2017-07-10 02:05
;)
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:53:36 +, Jones, Philip via aur-general wrote:
>I appreciate that the package
>(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libccmio/) is not hosted on the
>site but if you Google " libccmio-2.6.1.tar.gz" it is the top hit.
>
>The source has a copyright that states “The unauthoriz
Hi Santiago, all,
I'm very new to Arch and I don't know if the package I'm going to put
forward as an example violates itself any AUR rule, but for instance
'ufsd-pro-dkms' [1] depends on a file that is not freely distributable, and
the PKGBUILD has a file:// URL, so the user has to procure the fi
Hi Phillip.
I also don't want to enter a legal battle, and I certainly don't speak
for the rest of the Arch Linux team. However, it appears to me that
there's plenty going on here:
1) The distribution website is the first hit if you google
libccmio-2.6.1-.tar.gz, I wonder if your searches are
Jerome
I appreciate that the package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libccmio/) is
not hosted on the site but if you Google " libccmio-2.6.1.tar.gz" it is the top
hit.
The source has a copyright that states “The unauthorized use, distribution, or
duplication of this program is prohibited.
Hi Philip,
Just to be very clear: The AUR at https://aur.archlinux.org/ does not
host packages. There are (or should be) no binaries hosted by the Arch
Linux team, thus no redistribution issues.
Unless the software in question is quite literally under a
non-disclosure agreement, or some other type
On 25/06/2019 06:42, Jones, Philip via aur-general wrote> There is a
package hosted on https://aur.archlinux.org/ that is copyrighted and not
open source. How do I get it removed?
On every package page there is a "Submit Request" link; that link can be
used to file a deletion request.
However, I
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 07:42, Jones, Philip via aur-general
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> There is a package hosted on https://aur.archlinux.org/ that is copyrighted
> and not open source. How do I get it removed?
>
> Thanks
>
> Philip
>
>
> -
> Siemens Industry Software Limited is a limited
Hi
There is a package hosted on https://aur.archlinux.org/ that is copyrighted and
not open source. How do I get it removed?
Thanks
Philip
-
Siemens Industry Software Limited is a limited company registered in England
and Wales.
Registered number: 3476850.
Registered office:
17 matches
Mail list logo