On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Eli Schwartz
wrote:
> On 11/13/2017 09:35 AM, Michael Kogan wrote:
> > @1) Sorry, I am using the GMail web interface and forgot that it is
> quoting
> > previous mails automatically.
>
> I feel so sorry for you! :D I hope you have the opportunity to get back
> to
On 11/13/2017 09:35 AM, Michael Kogan wrote:
> @1) Sorry, I am using the GMail web interface and forgot that it is quoting
> previous mails automatically.
I feel so sorry for you! :D I hope you have the opportunity to get back
to using a proper email client soon. :)
> @2) Thanks, I will have read
@1) Sorry, I am using the GMail web interface and forgot that it is quoting
previous mails automatically.
@2) Thanks, I will have read it up at some point (I'm a bit ill currently,
so probably in a few days).
On 11/13/2017 07:32 AM, Michael Kogan wrote:
> Since we are speaking about it, where is a good place to read the
> documentation? :) I have got along with
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Submitting_packages
> so far but looks like this is not enough for some cases...
1)
Since we are speaking about it, where is a good place to read the
documentation? :) I have got along with
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Submitting_packages
so far but looks like this is not enough for some cases...
2017-11-13 13:26 GMT+01:00 Eli Schwartz :
> On 11/13/2
On 11/13/2017 07:22 AM, Bennett Piater wrote:
>> In this situation you should bump the pkgrel and push it. This would
>> "create"
>> the package again in the AUR.
>>
>> We don't actually delete the repositories, they are always there.
>
> Or, ssh aur.archlinux.org restore $pkgbase
>
> Even better
> In this situation you should bump the pkgrel and push it. This would
> "create"
> the package again in the AUR.
>
> We don't actually delete the repositories, they are always there.
Or, ssh aur.archlinux.org restore $pkgbase
Even better because you don't need to touch the pkgrel.
Cheers,
Benn
Makes sense, thanks for the hint!
2017-11-13 13:16 GMT+01:00 Giancarlo Razzolini :
> Em novembro 13, 2017 10:11 Michael Kogan escreveu:
>
>> Actually, I also thought so but when I tried, git told me that the repo is
>> up to date, so nothing changed and the package didn't appear in the AUR as
>>
Em novembro 13, 2017 10:11 Michael Kogan escreveu:
Actually, I also thought so but when I tried, git told me that the repo is
up to date, so nothing changed and the package didn't appear in the AUR as
well...
In this situation you should bump the pkgrel and push it. This would "create"
the pack
Actually, I also thought so but when I tried, git told me that the repo is
up to date, so nothing changed and the package didn't appear in the AUR as
well...
2017-11-13 12:54 GMT+01:00 Carlos Mogas da Silva via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org>:
> On 2017-11-13 10:57, Michael Kogan wrote:
On 2017-11-13 10:57, Michael Kogan wrote:
several complaints now that the issues are not solved for everybody. So
I
would like to request to put this package back to the AUR.
Unfortunately, I
cannot do it myself because its git repo still exists:
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGB
Thanks for the quick response, I will forward the good news! :)
2017-11-13 12:12 GMT+01:00 Morten Linderud :
> I have restored the package :)
>
> --
> Morten Linderud
>
> PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16
>
I have restored the package :)
--
Morten Linderud
PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello everybody,
about a month ago I submitted the skypeforlinux-beta-bin package to the AUR
due to an issue which appeared in newer skypeforlinux versions. Yesterday I
decided to get this package deleted because several people reported and I
could verify myself that the issue was fixed in the mos
14 matches
Mail list logo
