very well, i shall try that
On 17 September 2013 10:57, Felix Yan wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:51:40 Charles Pigott wrote:
> > well, no, but both packages are broken and have (semi-)working patches
> > posted in the comments which have been there for several months, with
> > nothi
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:51:40 Charles Pigott wrote:
> well, no, but both packages are broken and have (semi-)working patches
> posted in the comments which have been there for several months, with
> nothing done about them
Given that the two maintainers of the requested packages are stil
well, no, but both packages are broken and have (semi-)working patches
posted in the comments which have been there for several months, with
nothing done about them
C
On 17 September 2013 08:11, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Charles Pigott
> wrote:
> > While you're a
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Charles Pigott
wrote:
> While you're at it, can you disown devscripts too? (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/devscripts/) Similar situation
>
>
> On 16 September 2013 19:24, Charles Pigott
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, can you please disown the maintainer of debhelper (
Hi, can you please disown the maintainer of debhelper (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/debhelper/) ? It hasn'tbeen updated in
more than a year (http://joeyh.name/code/debhelper/) and doesn't build
Thanks
(Hope I'm using mailing lists correctly!)
While you're at it, can you disown devscripts too? (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/devscripts/) Similar situation
On 16 September 2013 19:24, Charles Pigott wrote:
> Hi, can you please disown the maintainer of debhelper (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/debhelper/) ? It hasn'tbeen upda
