Hello everyone,
Rorschach has asked me to bring the discussion at
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2033
to this mailing list.
Please help us find a consensus.
My answer to his last question is:
---
Let them install openjdk6 to provide the j2sdk dependency.
It's not the Arch philo
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Leslie P. Polzer
wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Rorschach has asked me to bring the discussion at
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2033
>
> to this mailing list.
>
> Please help us find a consensus.
>
>
> My answer to his last question is:
>
> ---
> Le
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Rorschach wrote:
> Is the provides field really doing what you think? Than I didn't understood
> it right. Could please someone bring some light to this?
>
> In general I think that Sun's Java should be kicked out as dependencie in
> every package where openjdk6
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 11:57:34AM +0100, Leslie P. Polzer wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Rorschach has asked me to bring the discussion at
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2033
>
> to this mailing list.
>
> Please help us find a consensus.
>
>
> My answer to his last question
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:07:01 +0100
Ronald van Haren wrote:
> let it depend on java-environment. This is both provided by openjdk6
> and the sun jdk package.
>
> Ronald
What package gets installed then if the user has until now none of these
installed:
$ pacman -sS java-environment
extra/java-gc
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Rorschach wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:07:01 +0100
> Ronald van Haren wrote:
>> let it depend on java-environment. This is both provided by openjdk6
>> and the sun jdk package.
>>
>> Ronald
>
> What package gets installed then if the user has until now none of t
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:22:26 +0100
Ronald van Haren wrote:
> in that case use j2sdk as suggested before.
If I use j2sdk as dependencie what package gets installed by pacman if the user
has no java already installed?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Rorschach wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:22:26 +0100
> Ronald van Haren wrote:
>
>> in that case use j2sdk as suggested before.
>
> If I use j2sdk as dependencie what package gets installed by pacman if the
> user has no java already installed?
>
the first packa
thanks Ronald van Haren and dejari for making this clear! I updated now all my
packages which require java: i2p, jondo and ipscan to depend on j2sdk instead
of openjdk6. I'm now going to add this to the java packaging guidelines.
greetings
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
Rorschach wrote:
thanks Ronald van Haren and dejari for making this clear! I updated now all my
packages which require java: i2p, jondo and ipscan to depend on j2sdk instead
of openjdk6. I'm now going to add this to the java packaging guidelines.
No, please don't do that. As far as I
Is the provides field really doing what you think? Than I didn't understood it
right. Could please someone bring some light to this?
In general I think that Sun's Java should be kicked out as dependencie in every
package where openjdk6 works fine because I think the main goal should be that
we
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Ondřej Kučera wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Rorschach wrote:
>>
>> thanks Ronald van Haren and dejari for making this clear! I updated now
>> all my packages which require java: i2p, jondo and ipscan to depend on j2sdk
>> instead of openjdk6. I'm now going to add this to the
2009/2/5 Xavier :
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Ondřej Kučera
> wrote:
>>
>> The "correct" dependencies now are the following two:
>> - java-runtime - needed for applications written in Java
>> - java-environment - needed for Java development and for applications that
>> need to compile Java
2009/2/5 Ronald van Haren :
> 2009/2/5 Xavier :
>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Ondřej Kučera
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The "correct" dependencies now are the following two:
>>> - java-runtime - needed for applications written in Java
>>> - java-environment - needed for Java development and for applic
Hi,
yes it is correct. It's just that the gcj one breaks stuff as it is
incompatible.
Vuze (formerly Azureus) in community has actually the same problem.
Works with jre, works with openjdk, doesn't work with gcj. Its site
claims that it should work though so maybe a little tweaking of the
s
using java-runtime as dependancy makes pacman install java-gcj-compat
wihc seems to broke most of the packages.
so before using java-runtime as dependancy one need to get rid off
java-gcj-compat ? no ?
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 05:47:16PM +0100, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
> using java-runtime as dependancy makes pacman install java-gcj-compat
> wihc seems to broke most of the packages.
>
> so before using java-runtime as dependancy one need to get rid off
> java-gcj-compat ? no ?
>
http://bugs.arch
17 matches
Mail list logo
